Literature DB >> 25485865

Lignocellulosic ethanol: Technology design and its impact on process efficiency.

Leona Paulova1, Petra Patakova2, Barbora Branska2, Mojmir Rychtera2, Karel Melzoch2.   

Abstract

This review provides current information on the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass, with the main focus on relationships between process design and efficiency, expressed as ethanol concentration, yield and productivity. In spite of unquestionable advantages of lignocellulosic biomass as a feedstock for ethanol production (availability, price, non-competitiveness with food, waste material), many technological bottlenecks hinder its wide industrial application and competitiveness with 1st generation ethanol production. Among the main technological challenges are the recalcitrant structure of the material, and thus the need for extensive pretreatment (usually physico-chemical followed by enzymatic hydrolysis) to yield fermentable sugars, and a relatively low concentration of monosaccharides in the medium that hinder the achievement of ethanol concentrations comparable with those obtained using 1st generation feedstocks (e.g. corn or molasses). The presence of both pentose and hexose sugars in the fermentation broth, the price of cellulolytic enzymes, and the presence of toxic compounds that can inhibit cellulolytic enzymes and microbial producers of ethanol are major issues. In this review, different process configurations of the main technological steps (enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation of hexose/and or pentose sugars) are discussed and their efficiencies are compared. The main features, benefits and drawbacks of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF), simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with delayed inoculation (dSSF), consolidated bioprocesses (CBP) combining production of cellulolytic enzymes, hydrolysis of biomass and fermentation into one step, together with an approach combining utilization of both pentose and hexose sugars are discussed and compared with separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) processes. The impact of individual technological steps on final process efficiency is emphasized and the potential for use of immobilized biocatalysts is considered.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBP; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Ethanol; Fermentation; Hexose; Immobilization; Lignocellulose; Pentose; Pretreatment; Process configuration; Productivity; SHF; SSF; Yield

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25485865     DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Adv        ISSN: 0734-9750            Impact factor:   14.227


  13 in total

1.  Genetic improvement of xylose metabolism by enhancing the expression of pentose phosphate pathway genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae IR-2 for high-temperature ethanol production.

Authors:  Yosuke Kobayashi; Takehiko Sahara; Toshihiro Suzuki; Saori Kamachi; Akinori Matsushika; Tamotsu Hoshino; Satoru Ohgiya; Yoichi Kamagata; Kazuhiro E Fujimori
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Synergies in coupled hydrolysis and fermentation of cellulose using a Trichoderma reesei enzyme preparation and a recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain.

Authors:  Mary Casa-Villegas; Julia Marín-Navarro; Julio Polaina
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Xylan extraction from pretreated sugarcane bagasse using alkaline and enzymatic approaches.

Authors:  Daniele Sporck; Felipe A M Reinoso; Jorge Rencoret; Ana Gutiérrez; José C Del Rio; André Ferraz; Adriane M F Milagres
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 6.040

4.  Co-fermentation using Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast Strains Hyper-secreting Different Cellulases for the Production of Cellulosic Bioethanol.

Authors:  Cho-Ryong Lee; Bong Hyun Sung; Kwang-Mook Lim; Mi-Jin Kim; Min Jeong Sohn; Jung-Hoon Bae; Jung-Hoon Sohn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Cellulose induced protein 1 (Cip1) from Trichoderma reesei enhances the enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulose.

Authors:  Hexue Jia; Wan Sun; Xuezhi Li; Jian Zhao
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.328

6.  Modular design of metabolic network for robust production of n-butanol from galactose-glucose mixtures.

Authors:  Hyun Gyu Lim; Jae Hyung Lim; Gyoo Yeol Jung
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Engineering of a novel cellulose-adherent cellulolytic Saccharomyces cerevisiae for cellulosic biofuel production.

Authors:  Zhuo Liu; Shih-Hsin Ho; Kengo Sasaki; Riaan den Haan; Kentaro Inokuma; Chiaki Ogino; Willem H van Zyl; Tomohisa Hasunuma; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Structural Changes of Lignin after Liquid Hot Water Pretreatment and Its Effect on the Enzymatic Hydrolysis.

Authors:  Wen Wang; Xinshu Zhuang; Zhenhong Yuan; Wei Qi; Qiang Yu; Qiong Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Production of Caproic Acid from Mixed Organic Waste: An Environmental Life Cycle Perspective.

Authors:  Wei-Shan Chen; David P B T B Strik; Cees J N Buisman; Carolien Kroeze
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  A downstream box fusion allows stable accumulation of a bacterial cellulase in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplasts.

Authors:  Lubna V Richter; Huijun Yang; Mohammad Yazdani; Maureen R Hanson; Beth A Ahner
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.