Literature DB >> 25485664

Object substitution masking for an attended and foveated target.

Hannah L Filmer1, Jason B Mattingley1, Paul E Dux1.   

Abstract

A central assumption of models proposed to explain object substitution masking (OSM) is that the phenomenon arises only when attention is distributed across several possible target locations. However, recent work has questioned the role of attention in OSM, suggesting instead that ceiling effects might explain the apparent interaction between spatial attention and masking. Here the authors report definitive evidence that OSM does not depend upon attention being distributed over space or time. In 2 experiments, they demonstrate reliable OSM for constant, foveal presentations of a single target stimulus. Crucially, in their design participants' attention was always focused on the target, thus discounting the hypothesis that a key requirement for OSM is distributed attention. The findings challenge how OSM is conceptualized in the broader masking literature and have important implications for theories of visual processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25485664     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  4 in total

1.  Revealing a competitive dynamic in rapid categorization with object substitution masking.

Authors:  Jason K Chow; Thomas J Palmeri; Michael L Mack
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The Effects of Semantic Role Predictability on the Production of Overt Pronouns in Spanish.

Authors:  Ana M Medina Fetterman; Natasha N Vazquez; Jennifer E Arnold
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2022-01-03

3.  Effects of Exogenous and Endogenous Attention on Metacontrast Masking.

Authors:  Sevda Agaoglu; Bruno Breitmeyer; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-10

4.  A closer look at four-dot masking of a foveated target.

Authors:  Marwan Daar; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.