Literature DB >> 25484760

Crystal structures of 3,6-di-allyl-tetra-cyclo[6.3.0.0(4,11).0(5,9)]undeca-2,7-dione and 1,7-di-allyl-penta-cyclo-[5.4.0.0(2,6). 0(3,10).0(5,9)]undecane-8,11-dione: allyl-ated caged compounds.

Sambasivarao Kotha1, Vital Seema1, Deepak Deodhar1, Mobin Shaikh1.   

Abstract

The title compounds, C17H20O2 (1) and C17H18O2 (2), are allyl-ated caged compounds. In (1), the carbon atoms bearing the allyl groups are far apart [2.9417 (17) Å], hence the expected ring-closing metathesis (RCM) protocol failed to give a ring-closing product. When these carbon atoms are connected by a C-C bond as in (2), the distance between them is much smaller [1.611 (3) Å] and consequently the RCM process was successful. The caged carbon skeleton of (1) can be described as a fusion of four five-membered rings and one six-membered ring. All four five-membered rings exhibit envelope conformations. The structure of compound (2) consists of four five-membered rings, of which two are cyclo-penta-none rings bonded at the 2, 4 and 5 positions and linked at the 3-carbons by a methyl-ene bridge. It also consists of one four-membered and two six-membered rings. All four five-membered rings adopt envelope conformations. In the crystal of (1), mol-ecules are linked via C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming sheets lying parallel to (010). In the crystal of (2), mol-ecules are linked via C-H⋯O hydrogen bonds forming chains along [100].

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crystal structure; Diels–Alder reaction; [2 + 2] cyclo­additions; caged compounds; crystal structure; penta­cyclo [5.4.0.02,6.03,10.05,9]undecane (PCUD); ring-closing metathesis (RCM)

Year:  2014        PMID: 25484760      PMCID: PMC4257271          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814023149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Chemical context

Caged mol­ecules are much sought after chemical entities due to their diverse applications such as high-energy materials, drug inter­mediates and starting materials for complex natural products (Marchand, 1989a ▶,b ▶; Mehta & Srikrishna, 1997 ▶). The intricacies involved in the structural frame of caged mol­ecules, such as deformation of ideal CC bond angle and other unusual structural features, make them challenging synthetic targets (Olah, 1990 ▶; Osawa & Yonemitsu, 1992 ▶). Caged mol­ecules are strained due to the rigid geometrical features and they exhibit inter­esting properties (Von et al., 1986 ▶): the high negative heat of combustion and elevated positive heat of formation for caged compounds reveal the strain involved in their mol­ecular architecture. In connection with our inter­est in designing new varieties of caged compounds, we have synthesized several functionalized derivatives of penta­cyclo [5.4.0.02,6.03,10.05,9]undecane (PCUD) systems (Kotha & Dipak, 2006 ▶; Kotha et al., 2010 ▶). Herein, we report on the crystal structures of the title compounds, (1) and (2). These compounds, and their reactions mentioned in this article, are known in the literature (Kotha et al., 1999 ▶, 2006 ▶) but their crystal structures have not previously been reported. When diallyl tetra­cyclic dione (1) was subjected to ring-closing metathesis (RCM), the expected ring-closing product (3) was not obtained, Fig. 1 ▶. Whereas, compound (2) successfully underwent RCM to yield the desired ring-closing product (4), see Fig. 1 ▶. Further, when compound (1) was subjected to cross metathesis (CM) with but-2-ene-1,4-diallyl acetate (7) in the presence of Grubbs catalyst (Fig. 2 ▶), the di­acetate (5) was formed in 55% yield. Under similar reaction conditions, the penta­cyclic dione (2) did not deliver the cross-coupled product (6), but instead the RCM product (4) was formed, see Fig. 1 ▶. To gain insight about these observations, the crystal structure determinations of compounds (1) and (2) were undertaken.
Figure 1

Synthesis of cage systems (1) and (2).

Figure 2

Various Grubbs catalysts used for ring-closing metathesis (RCM).

Structural commentary

The caged carbon skeleton of (1), Fig. 3 ▶, can be described as a fusion of four five-membered rings and one six-membered ring, the latter having a boat conformation. All four five-membered rings exhibit envelope conformations, with atoms C3, twice C17, and C11 as the flap atoms of the various rings. Compound (1) is symmetrically substituted with two allyl groups at atoms C5 and C10. The few crystal structures of PCUD compounds that are recorded in Cambridge Structural Database (Groom & Allen, 2014 ▶) show no bridging route through the substituents that link the C-atoms [e.g. C1 to C9, Fig. 3 ▶]. These compounds are substituted at C1 and/or C9 so that these mol­ecules form the open mouth of the cage. The tetra­cyclic compound (1) shows symmetrical substitution with keto moieties at atoms C1 and C9.
Figure 3

A view of the mol­ecular structure of compound (1), with atom labelling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

The CC strained bond angles in (1) vary from 95.31 (10) to 125.21 (14)°, deviating from the ideal tetra­hedral angle of 109.5°. Previous studies showed that PCUD caged compounds normally display CC bond lengths which deviate from expected value of 1.54 Å (Bott et al., 1998 ▶; Flippen-Anderson et al., 1991 ▶; Linden et al., 2005 ▶; Kruger et al., 2005 ▶). The structure of (1) also exhibits unusual Csp 3—Csp 3 single-bond lengths ranging from 1.5092 (19) Å to 1.5935 (19) Å. The bond C2—C10, which is parallel and immediately adjacent to C1—C9 axis, was found to be longer, with a value of 1.5935 (19) Å. The increase in bond length can be the result of stretching strain commenced by the open mouth of the cage formed by carbonyls bearing carbon atoms, i.e. C1 and C9. Similar observations were made in compound (2), i.e. 1.597 (4) Å for C5—C10. The structure of compound (2), Fig. 4 ▶, consists of four five-membered rings, of which two are cyclo­penta­none rings, bonded at the 2, 4 and 5 positions and linked at the 3-carbons by a methyl­ene bridge. It also consists of one four-membered and two six-membered rings, the latter both having a boat conformation. All four five-membered rings adopt envelope conformations, with atoms C5, twice C11, and C10 as the flaps atoms of the various rings. Bonds C4—C11 and C7—C15, corresponding to 1.522 (4) and 1.522 (3) Å, respectively, are the shortest. The longest CC bonds i.e. C2—C7 [1.611 (3) Å] and C5—C10 [1.597 (4) Å], along with C2—C3, C3—C4 and C7—C8 exceed the expected bond-length value of 1.54 Å. The bonds involving the bridge-head atom C11 are shorter than expected; C9—C11 and C4—C11 being 1.523 (4) and 1.522 (4) Å, respectively. The tetra­hedral bond angle C8—C7—C2 is the most strained with the smallest angle of 88.77 (17)° and the C15—C7—C8 bond angle of 119.6 (2)° is the largest one, again showing considerable deviation from the standard value of 109.5°.
Figure 4

A view of the mol­ecular structure of compound (2), with atom labelling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

It was anti­cipated that the two allyl groups present in (1) would undergo RCM to generate a new penta­cyclic system (3) (Fig. 1 ▶). However, it was observed that even under forcing reaction conditions, (1) did not generate the expected RCM product, whereas compound (2) underwent an RCM sequence smoothly to give (4) in good yield (Fig. 1 ▶). It was found that the allyl-bearing carbon atoms in tetra­cyclic system (1) are too far apart [C5—C13 = 2.9417 (17) Å] and we believe that due to this reason, the RCM protocol failed. When these carbon atoms are bonded, the distance between them was found to be smaller. Thus in (2), the distance between the bonded atoms C2—C7 is 1.611 (3) Å. During CM, Fig. 1 ▶, dione (2) was reacted with but-2-ene-1,4-diallyl acetate (7) to produce cross-coupling product (6). However, (2) failed to deliver the CM product, but under similar conditions, (1) successfully gave the di­acetate (5). In the present scenario, the distance between the allyl-bearing carbon atoms in (1) and (2) has been correlated to understand the reactivity pattern. When the distance between these carbon atoms is large as in the case of (1), the CM product is preferred over RCM, and when the distance is smaller, the RCM product is predominant over the CM product. The conclusion is that, as the C5—C13 separation in (1) is large [2.9417 (17) Å], the carbon atoms bearing the allyl groups are far apart in this tetra­cyclic system, and the expected ring-closing metathesis (RCM) protocol failed to give the ring-closing product (3), Fig. 1 ▶. When these carbon atoms are connected by a CC bond as in (2), the C2—C7 bond distance was found to be much smaller [1.611 (3) Å], and consequently the RCM process was successful giving the diallyl compound (4), Fig. 1 ▶.

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal of (1), mol­ecules are linked via C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming sheets lying parallel to (010); see Fig. 5 ▶ and Table 1 ▶.
Figure 5

A view along the b axis of the crystal packing of compound (1). Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines (see Table 1 ▶ for details; only the H atoms involved in these hydrogen bonds are shown).

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, ) for (1)

DHA DHHA D A DHA
C8H8BO2i 0.952.423.3532(18)168
C11H11O1ii 1.002.493.4815(16)173
C16H16BO1iii 0.952.513.455(2)177

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

In the crystal of (2), mol­ecules are linked via C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming chains along [100]; see Fig. 6 ▶ and Table 2 ▶.
Figure 6

A view along the c axis of the crystal packing of compound (2). Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines (see Table 2 ▶ for details; only the H atoms involved in these hydrogen bonds are shown).

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, ) for (2)

DHA DHHA D A DHA
C9H9O2i 1.002.443.412(3)165
C15H15BO2ii 0.992.433.383(3)160

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Synthesis and crystallization

Compounds (1) and (2) were prepared by the procedures reported in the literature (Kotha et al., 1999 ▶ and Kotha et al., 2006 ▶, respectively) and their melting points were compared with the reported values. In addition, their identity was confirmed by NMR spectroscopic data. Compound (1): The crude compound (1) was obtained after reaction work-up and was purified using silica gel column chromatography (3% EtOAc/petroleum ether). Colourless crystals were isolated when the solvent was allowed to evaporate (m.p. 356.15–357.15 K; literature m.p. 357.15–358.15 K). Compound (2): The crude compound (2) was obtained after reaction work-up and was purified using silica gel column chromatography (5% EtOAc/petroleum ether). Colourless crystals were isolated when the solvent was allowed to evaporate (m.p. 353.15–354.15 K; literature m.p. 353.15–354.15 K).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details of compounds (1) and (2) are summarized in the Table 3 ▶. For both the compounds all H atoms were placed in geometrically calculated positions and refined using a riding model, with C—H = 0.95–1.00 Å and with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C).
Table 3

Experimental details

 (1)(2)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC17H20O2 C17H18O2
M r 256.33254.31
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)150150
a, b, c ()7.8006(3), 17.9581(7), 10.1032(4)8.7041(5), 18.3992(9), 9.0906(6)
()99.664(4)113.043(7)
V (3)1395.21(9)1339.69(13)
Z 44
Radiation typeMo K Mo K
(mm1)0.080.08
Crystal size (mm)0.29 0.25 0.210.32 0.28 0.23
 
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Xcalibur-SOxford Diffraction Xcalibur-S
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006)Multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006)
T min, T max 0.978, 0.9840.975, 0.982
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2(I)] reflections9836, 2448, 19888644, 2356, 1625
R int 0.0200.036
(sin /)max (1)0.5950.595
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.035, 0.099, 1.060.059, 0.188, 1.10
No. of reflections24482356
No. of parameters172172
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrainedH-atom parameters constrained
max, min (e 3)0.20, 0.150.10, 0.34

Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006 ▶), SHELXS97 and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▶), PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) 1, 2, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814023149/su5002sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 1. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814023149/su50021sup2.hkl Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 2. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814023149/su50022sup3.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814023149/su50022sup4.cml CCDC references: 832290, 963826 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C17H18O2F(000) = 544
Mr = 254.31Dx = 1.261 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMelting point = 354.15–353.15 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.7041 (5) ÅCell parameters from 4211 reflections
b = 18.3992 (9) Åθ = 3.3–32.4°
c = 9.0906 (6) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
β = 113.043 (7)°T = 150 K
V = 1339.69 (13) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.32 × 0.28 × 0.23 mm
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur-S diffractometer2356 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source1625 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.036
Detector resolution: 15.9948 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.3°
ω/θ scansh = −9→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006)k = −21→21
Tmin = 0.975, Tmax = 0.982l = −10→10
8644 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.059Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.188H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1199P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2356 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
172 parametersΔρmax = 0.10 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.34 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O1−0.1367 (2)0.06672 (11)0.5971 (2)0.0424 (6)
O20.2051 (2)−0.02964 (10)0.9446 (2)0.0432 (6)
C1−0.0014 (3)0.09420 (13)0.6688 (3)0.0304 (6)
C20.0464 (3)0.14322 (12)0.8151 (3)0.0253 (6)
C30.1827 (3)0.19321 (13)0.7979 (3)0.0248 (6)
H30.17010.24660.80990.030*
C40.2176 (3)0.16845 (14)0.6509 (3)0.0322 (6)
H40.16840.20000.55410.039*
C50.1520 (3)0.08931 (14)0.6303 (3)0.0336 (7)
H50.13100.06780.52310.040*
C60.2263 (3)0.03044 (14)0.9011 (3)0.0322 (6)
C70.1904 (3)0.10269 (13)0.9618 (3)0.0268 (6)
C80.3217 (3)0.15429 (13)0.9379 (3)0.0267 (6)
H80.38990.18511.03130.032*
C90.4181 (3)0.11108 (14)0.8554 (3)0.0331 (7)
H90.53340.09550.92660.040*
C100.2941 (3)0.04889 (14)0.7757 (3)0.0341 (7)
H100.34540.00660.74250.041*
C110.4068 (3)0.16081 (15)0.7176 (3)0.0377 (7)
H11A0.46510.20770.75440.045*
H11B0.44700.13720.64140.045*
C12−0.1015 (3)0.17601 (13)0.8421 (3)0.0287 (6)
H12A−0.17860.13670.84350.034*
H12B−0.06090.20050.94750.034*
C13−0.1941 (3)0.22985 (15)0.7137 (3)0.0345 (7)
H13−0.24990.21150.60840.041*
C14−0.2046 (4)0.29917 (16)0.7340 (4)0.0441 (8)
H14A−0.15080.31990.83740.053*
H14B−0.26620.32920.64560.053*
C150.1757 (3)0.10004 (14)1.1231 (3)0.0338 (7)
H15A0.15410.14951.15320.041*
H15B0.08030.06871.11530.041*
C160.3326 (4)0.0708 (2)1.2495 (4)0.0542 (9)
H160.34450.01941.25510.065*
C170.4476 (5)0.1061 (2)1.3466 (4)0.0664 (11)
H17A0.44220.15771.34620.080*
H17B0.54190.08181.42190.080*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0307 (11)0.0387 (12)0.0478 (12)−0.0057 (9)0.0047 (9)−0.0107 (9)
O20.0398 (12)0.0226 (10)0.0648 (14)0.0051 (9)0.0180 (10)0.0092 (9)
C10.0301 (14)0.0206 (13)0.0343 (14)0.0013 (11)0.0059 (12)0.0028 (10)
C20.0248 (13)0.0201 (12)0.0297 (13)0.0025 (10)0.0092 (11)0.0032 (10)
C30.0277 (13)0.0180 (12)0.0290 (13)−0.0009 (10)0.0113 (11)0.0000 (9)
C40.0360 (15)0.0319 (14)0.0305 (13)0.0004 (12)0.0149 (12)0.0021 (11)
C50.0365 (15)0.0324 (15)0.0312 (14)−0.0005 (12)0.0125 (12)−0.0092 (11)
C60.0226 (13)0.0251 (14)0.0426 (15)0.0024 (11)0.0058 (12)0.0022 (11)
C70.0254 (13)0.0222 (13)0.0309 (13)0.0027 (10)0.0089 (11)0.0022 (10)
C80.0254 (13)0.0237 (13)0.0285 (13)−0.0019 (10)0.0080 (11)−0.0041 (10)
C90.0238 (13)0.0363 (15)0.0395 (15)0.0017 (11)0.0127 (12)−0.0053 (12)
C100.0314 (15)0.0274 (14)0.0450 (16)0.0048 (11)0.0166 (13)−0.0066 (11)
C110.0366 (16)0.0394 (16)0.0446 (16)−0.0006 (13)0.0239 (13)−0.0019 (13)
C120.0260 (13)0.0249 (13)0.0359 (14)0.0003 (11)0.0127 (11)0.0030 (11)
C130.0261 (14)0.0387 (16)0.0367 (14)0.0062 (12)0.0100 (12)0.0040 (12)
C140.0397 (17)0.0329 (16)0.0550 (18)0.0086 (13)0.0136 (15)0.0089 (13)
C150.0332 (14)0.0334 (15)0.0358 (14)0.0057 (12)0.0146 (12)0.0085 (12)
C160.0457 (19)0.078 (2)0.0377 (17)0.0160 (18)0.0153 (15)0.0077 (17)
C170.059 (2)0.087 (3)0.051 (2)0.011 (2)0.0193 (19)−0.006 (2)
O1—C11.211 (3)C9—C111.523 (4)
O2—C61.212 (3)C9—C101.545 (4)
C1—C51.510 (4)C9—H91.0000
C1—C21.524 (4)C10—H101.0000
C2—C121.526 (3)C11—H11A0.9900
C2—C31.557 (3)C11—H11B0.9900
C2—C71.611 (3)C12—C131.502 (4)
C3—C81.546 (3)C12—H12A0.9900
C3—C41.550 (4)C12—H12B0.9900
C3—H31.0000C13—C141.297 (4)
C4—C111.522 (4)C13—H130.9500
C4—C51.549 (4)C14—H14A0.9500
C4—H41.0000C14—H14B0.9500
C5—C101.597 (4)C15—C161.498 (4)
C5—H51.0000C15—H15A0.9900
C6—C101.513 (4)C15—H15B0.9900
C6—C71.518 (3)C16—C171.229 (5)
C7—C151.522 (3)C16—H160.9500
C7—C81.565 (4)C17—H17A0.9500
C8—C91.546 (4)C17—H17B0.9500
C8—H81.0000
O1—C1—C5127.7 (2)C11—C9—C10104.6 (2)
O1—C1—C2126.4 (3)C11—C9—C8102.6 (2)
C5—C1—C2105.9 (2)C10—C9—C8101.3 (2)
C1—C2—C12114.5 (2)C11—C9—H9115.5
C1—C2—C3102.7 (2)C10—C9—H9115.5
C12—C2—C3120.4 (2)C8—C9—H9115.5
C1—C2—C7107.84 (19)C6—C10—C9102.7 (2)
C12—C2—C7118.8 (2)C6—C10—C5108.9 (2)
C3—C2—C788.83 (17)C9—C10—C5102.5 (2)
C8—C3—C4102.6 (2)C6—C10—H10113.9
C8—C3—C291.47 (18)C9—C10—H10113.9
C4—C3—C2109.09 (19)C5—C10—H10113.9
C8—C3—H3116.7C4—C11—C995.4 (2)
C4—C3—H3116.7C4—C11—H11A112.7
C2—C3—H3116.7C9—C11—H11A112.7
C11—C4—C5104.6 (2)C4—C11—H11B112.7
C11—C4—C3103.3 (2)C9—C11—H11B112.7
C5—C4—C3101.1 (2)H11A—C11—H11B110.1
C11—C4—H4115.3C13—C12—C2111.4 (2)
C5—C4—H4115.3C13—C12—H12A109.3
C3—C4—H4115.3C2—C12—H12A109.3
C1—C5—C4103.5 (2)C13—C12—H12B109.3
C1—C5—C10107.7 (2)C2—C12—H12B109.3
C4—C5—C10102.0 (2)H12A—C12—H12B108.0
C1—C5—H5114.1C14—C13—C12125.7 (3)
C4—C5—H5114.1C14—C13—H13117.1
C10—C5—H5114.1C12—C13—H13117.1
O2—C6—C10127.2 (2)C13—C14—H14A120.0
O2—C6—C7127.0 (2)C13—C14—H14B120.0
C10—C6—C7105.9 (2)H14A—C14—H14B120.0
C6—C7—C15115.4 (2)C16—C15—C7110.8 (2)
C6—C7—C8102.5 (2)C16—C15—H15A109.5
C15—C7—C8119.6 (2)C7—C15—H15A109.5
C6—C7—C2108.00 (19)C16—C15—H15B109.5
C15—C7—C2118.7 (2)C7—C15—H15B109.5
C8—C7—C288.77 (17)H15A—C15—H15B108.1
C3—C8—C9103.7 (2)C17—C16—C15127.0 (4)
C3—C8—C790.93 (18)C17—C16—H16116.5
C9—C8—C7108.6 (2)C15—C16—H16116.5
C3—C8—H8116.7C16—C17—H17A120.0
C9—C8—H8116.7C16—C17—H17B120.0
C7—C8—H8116.7H17A—C17—H17B120.0
O1—C1—C2—C12−17.7 (4)C4—C3—C8—C9−0.8 (2)
C5—C1—C2—C12160.6 (2)C2—C3—C8—C9109.1 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C3−150.1 (2)C4—C3—C8—C7−110.27 (19)
C5—C1—C2—C328.2 (2)C2—C3—C8—C7−0.32 (18)
O1—C1—C2—C7117.0 (3)C6—C7—C8—C3108.48 (19)
C5—C1—C2—C7−64.7 (2)C15—C7—C8—C3−122.4 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C8−107.72 (19)C2—C7—C8—C30.31 (17)
C12—C2—C3—C8123.5 (2)C6—C7—C8—C93.6 (2)
C7—C2—C3—C80.31 (18)C15—C7—C8—C9132.8 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C4−3.8 (2)C2—C7—C8—C9−104.5 (2)
C12—C2—C3—C4−132.6 (2)C3—C8—C9—C1134.2 (2)
C7—C2—C3—C4104.2 (2)C7—C8—C9—C11129.9 (2)
C8—C3—C4—C11−32.9 (2)C3—C8—C9—C10−73.7 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C11−129.0 (2)C7—C8—C9—C1022.0 (2)
C8—C3—C4—C575.2 (2)O2—C6—C10—C9−135.8 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5−20.9 (2)C7—C6—C10—C944.1 (2)
O1—C1—C5—C4135.6 (3)O2—C6—C10—C5116.1 (3)
C2—C1—C5—C4−42.6 (2)C7—C6—C10—C5−64.0 (2)
O1—C1—C5—C10−116.8 (3)C11—C9—C10—C6−145.8 (2)
C2—C1—C5—C1064.9 (2)C8—C9—C10—C6−39.4 (2)
C11—C4—C5—C1145.1 (2)C11—C9—C10—C5−32.8 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C138.0 (2)C8—C9—C10—C573.5 (2)
C11—C4—C5—C1033.3 (2)C1—C5—C10—C6−0.5 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C10−73.8 (2)C4—C5—C10—C6108.0 (2)
O2—C6—C7—C1519.1 (4)C1—C5—C10—C9−108.8 (2)
C10—C6—C7—C15−160.8 (2)C4—C5—C10—C9−0.3 (2)
O2—C6—C7—C8150.9 (3)C5—C4—C11—C9−52.5 (2)
C10—C6—C7—C8−29.1 (2)C3—C4—C11—C953.0 (2)
O2—C6—C7—C2−116.4 (3)C10—C9—C11—C452.2 (2)
C10—C6—C7—C263.7 (2)C8—C9—C11—C4−53.2 (2)
C1—C2—C7—C60.0 (3)C1—C2—C12—C13−67.8 (3)
C12—C2—C7—C6132.4 (2)C3—C2—C12—C1355.5 (3)
C3—C2—C7—C6−103.0 (2)C7—C2—C12—C13162.7 (2)
C1—C2—C7—C15−133.8 (2)C2—C12—C13—C14−114.1 (3)
C12—C2—C7—C15−1.3 (3)C6—C7—C15—C1658.3 (3)
C3—C2—C7—C15123.2 (2)C8—C7—C15—C16−64.7 (3)
C1—C2—C7—C8102.7 (2)C2—C7—C15—C16−171.2 (2)
C12—C2—C7—C8−124.9 (2)C7—C15—C16—C1798.4 (4)
C3—C2—C7—C8−0.31 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C9—H9···O2i1.002.443.412 (3)165
C15—H15B···O2ii0.992.433.383 (3)160
  6 in total

1.  Synthesis of Polyquinane Natural Products: An Update.

Authors:  Goverdhan Mehta; A. Srikrishna
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1997-05-08       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Design and synthesis of novel propellanes by using claisen rearrangement and ring-closing metathesis as the key steps.

Authors:  Sambasivarao Kotha; Mirtunjay Kumar Dipak
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 5.236

3.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

4.  The Cambridge Structural Database in retrospect and prospect.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Frank H Allen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Trifluoromethyl derivatives of pentacyclo[5.4.0.0(2,6).0(3,10).0(5,9)]undecane.

Authors:  Anthony Linden; Jarosław Romański; Grzegorz Mlostoń; Heinz Heimgartner
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 1.172

6.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.