Literature DB >> 25484351

The impact of eating methods on eating rate and glycemic response in healthy adults.

Lijuan Sun1, Dinesh Viren Ranawana1, Wei Jie Kevin Tan1, Yu Chin Rina Quek1, Christiani Jeyakumar Henry2.   

Abstract

Singapore is an island state that is composed of three major ethnic groups, namely Chinese, Malay and Indian. Its inhabitants consume food either using chopsticks (Chinese), fingers (Malay and Indian) or spoon (Chinese, Malay and Indian). Previous work by our group showed that the degree of mastication significantly influenced the glycemic response. The degree of mastication in turn may depend on the eating method as the amount of food taken per mouthful and chewing time differs between eating methods. Eleven healthy volunteers came in on six non-consecutive days to the laboratory and evaluated three methods of eating white rice (spoon, chopsticks and fingers) once and the reference food (glucose solution) three times in a random order. Their glycemic response (GR) was measured for the subsequent 120 min. Mastication parameters were determined using surface electrode electromyography. The GR to white rice eating with chopsticks was significantly lower than spoon. The GI of eating rice with chopsticks was 68 which is significantly lower than eating with spoon (GI=81). However there were no differences between fingers and spoon, and between fingers and chopsticks either in GR 120 min or GI. The inter-individual number of mouthful, number of chews per mouthful, chewing time per mouthful and the total time taken to consume the whole portion of rice were significantly different between spoon and chopsticks groups. Significant correlations between the number of mouthful to take the entire portion of rice and amount of rice per mouthful during mastication and the GR were observed for eating rice with spoon and chopsticks, but not for fingers. The results suggest that individual differences in number of mouthful and amount of rice per mouthful may be two of the causes for inter-individual differences in the GR between spoon and chopsticks. The present study suggests that eating rice with different feeding tools has different chewing times and amount of food taken per mouthful and then alters the GI of the rice.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eating method; Eating rate; Glycemic response; Mastication; White rice

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25484351     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  13 in total

1.  The role of digestive factors in determining glycemic response in a multiethnic Asian population.

Authors:  Verena Ming Hui Tan; Delicia Shu Qin Ooi; Jeevesh Kapur; Ting Wu; Yiong Huak Chan; Christiani Jeyakumar Henry; Yung Seng Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  A comparison between whole grain and pearled oats: acute postprandial glycaemic responses and in vitro carbohydrate digestion in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Ruixin Zhu; Zhihong Fan; Guojing Li; Yixue Wu; Wenqi Zhao; Ting Ye; Linlin Wang
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.614

3.  Increased oral processing and a slower eating rate increase glycaemic, insulin and satiety responses to a mixed meal tolerance test.

Authors:  Ai Ting Goh; Jie Ying Michelle Choy; Xin Hui Chua; Shalini Ponnalagu; Chin Meng Khoo; Clare Whitton; Rob Martinus van Dam; Ciarán Gerard Forde
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Early-life influences on obesity: from preconception to adolescence.

Authors:  Mark L Wahlqvist; Stephen A Krawetz; Nico S Rizzo; Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello; Linda M Szymanski; Shari Barkin; Ann Yatkine; Robert A Waterland; Julie A Mennella; Mina Desai; Michael G Ross; Nancy F Krebs; Bridget E Young; Jane Wardle; Christiane D Wrann; John G Kral
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Prospective Study of Different Staple Diets of Diabetic Indian Population.

Authors:  Nagarathna Raghuram; Akshay Anand; Deepali Mathur; Suchitra S Patil; Amit Singh; S K Rajesh; Geetharani Hari; Prashant Verma; Sapna Nanda; Nagendra Hongasandra
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-24

6.  Content Validation of a Chrononutrition Questionnaire for the General and Shift Work Populations: A Delphi Study.

Authors:  Yan Yin Phoi; Maxine P Bonham; Michelle Rogers; Jillian Dorrian; Alison M Coates
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Relationship between body mass index and masticatory factors evaluated with a wearable device.

Authors:  Shogo Yoshimura; Kazuhiro Hori; Fumiko Uehara; Shoko Hori; Yoshio Yamaga; Yoko Hasegawa; Kohei Akazawa; Takahiro Ono
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Infant Feeding Practices in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Cohort: The GUSTO Study.

Authors:  Jia Ying Toh; Grace Yip; Wee Meng Han; Doris Fok; Yen-Ling Low; Yung Seng Lee; Salome A Rebello; Seang-Mei Saw; Kenneth Kwek; Keith M Godfrey; Yap-Seng Chong; Mary Foong-Fong Chong
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 9.  How Important Is Eating Rate in the Physiological Response to Food Intake, Control of Body Weight, and Glycemia?

Authors:  Georgia Argyrakopoulou; Stamatia Simati; George Dimitriadis; Alexander Kokkinos
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Association Between Self-Reported Eating Rate, Energy Intake, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population.

Authors:  Pey Sze Teo; Rob M van Dam; Clare Whitton; Linda Wei Lin Tan; Ciarán G Forde
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.