Literature DB >> 31166843

Reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage: compliance with PRISMA guidelines.

Valantine Ngum Ndze1,2, Anelisa Jaca1,3, Charles Shey Wiysonge1,3,4.   

Abstract

Systematic reviews have become increasingly important for informing clinical practice and policy; however, little is known about the reporting characteristics and quality of SRs of interventions to improve immunization coverage in different settings. The aim of this study was to assess the reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions aimed at improving vaccination coverage using the recommended Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guideline.PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched to identify SRs of interventions to improve immunization coverage, indexed up to May 2016. Two authors independently screened the search output, assessed study eligibility, and extracted data from eligible SRs using a 27-item data collection form derived from PRISMA. Discrepancies in reviews assessments were resolved by discussion and consensus.A total of 57 reviews were included in this study with a mean percentage of applicable PRISMA items that were met across all studies of 66% (range 19-100%) and median compliance of 70%. 39 out of the 57 reviews were published after the release of the PRISMA statement in 2009. Highest compliance was observed in items related to the "description of rational", "description of eligibility criteria", "synthesis of results" and "provision of a general interpretation of the results" (items #3, #6, #14 and #26, respectively). Compliance was poorest in the items "describing summary of evidence" (item 24, 19%), "describing indication of review protocol and registration" (item 5, 26%) and "describing results of risk of bias across studies (item 22, 33%).The overall reporting quality of systematic reviews of interventions to improve vaccination coverage requires significant improvement. There remains a need for additional research targeted at addressing potential barriers to compliance and strategies to improve compliance with PRISMA guideline.

Keywords:  PRISMA; Vaccination coverage; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31166843      PMCID: PMC6930115          DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1623998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  72 in total

Review 1.  The effect of home visiting programmes on uptake of childhood immunization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Kendrick; M Hewitt; M Dewey; R Elkan; M Blair; J Robinson; D Williams; K Brummell
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents, and adults. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

Authors:  P A Briss; L E Rodewald; A R Hinman; A M Shefer; R A Strikas; R R Bernier; V G Carande-Kulis; H R Yusuf; S M Ndiaye; S M Williams
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 3.  The effect of audit and feedback on immunization delivery: a systematic review.

Authors:  W C Bordley; A Chelminski; P A Margolis; R Kraus; P G Szilagyi; J J Vann
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  The costs, effects and cost-effectiveness of strategies to increase coverage of routine immunizations in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review of the grey literature.

Authors:  Katherine Batt; J A Fox-Rushby; Marianela Castillo-Riquelme
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 5.  The effects and costs of expanding the coverage of immunisation services in developing countries: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Elisabetta Pegurri; Julia A Fox-Rushby; Walker Damian
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?

Authors:  Adam S Tunis; Matthew D F McInnes; Ramez Hanna; Kaisra Esmail
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Parental reminder, recall and educational interventions to improve early childhood immunisation uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannah Harvey; Nadja Reissland; James Mason
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  Systematic review of the effect of immunization mandates on uptake of routine childhood immunizations.

Authors:  Cecilia Lee; Joan L Robinson
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 6.072

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

Review 10.  Strategies to increase the demand for childhood vaccination in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mira Johri; Myriam Cielo Pérez; Catherine Arsenault; Jitendar K Sharma; Nitika Pant Pai; Smriti Pahwa; Marie-Pierre Sylvestre
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 9.408

View more
  1 in total

1.  Response to: Letter to the Editor, Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgery for Spinal Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David Eugenio Hinojosa-Gonzalez; Andres Roblesgil-Medrano; Juan Bernardo Villarreal-Espinoza; Eduardo Tellez-Garcia; Luis Carlos Bueno-Gutierrez; Jose Ramon Rodriguez-Barreda; Eduardo Flores-Villalba; Jose Antonio Figueroa-Sanchez
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2021-10-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.