BACKGROUND: Hunger enhances sensitivity to reward, yet individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) are not motivated to eat when starved. This study investigated brain response to rewards during hunger and satiated states to examine whether diminished response to reward could underlie food restriction in AN. METHODS: Using a delay discounting monetary decision task known to discriminate brain regions contributing to processing of immediate rewards and cognitive control important for decision making regarding future rewards, we compared 23 women remitted from AN (RAN group; to reduce the confounding effects of starvation) with 17 healthy comparison women (CW group). Monetary rewards were used because the rewarding value of food may be confounded by anxiety in AN. RESULTS: Interactions of Group (RAN, CW) × Visit (hunger, satiety) revealed that, for the CW group, hunger significantly increased activation in reward salience circuitry (ventral striatum, dorsal caudate, anterior cingulate cortex) during processing of immediate reward, whereas satiety increased activation in cognitive control circuitry (ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, insula) during decision making. In contrast, brain response in reward and cognitive neurocircuitry did not differ during hunger and satiety in the RAN group. A main effect of group revealed elevated response in the middle frontal gyrus for the RAN group compared with the CW group. CONCLUSIONS: Women remitted from AN failed to increase activation of reward valuation circuitry when hungry and showed elevated response in cognitive control circuitry independent of metabolic state. Decreased sensitivity to the motivational drive of hunger may explain the ability of individuals with AN to restrict food when emaciated. Difficulties in valuating emotional salience may contribute to inabilities to appreciate the risks inherent in this disorder.
BACKGROUND: Hunger enhances sensitivity to reward, yet individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) are not motivated to eat when starved. This study investigated brain response to rewards during hunger and satiated states to examine whether diminished response to reward could underlie food restriction in AN. METHODS: Using a delay discounting monetary decision task known to discriminate brain regions contributing to processing of immediate rewards and cognitive control important for decision making regarding future rewards, we compared 23 women remitted from AN (RAN group; to reduce the confounding effects of starvation) with 17 healthy comparison women (CW group). Monetary rewards were used because the rewarding value of food may be confounded by anxiety in AN. RESULTS: Interactions of Group (RAN, CW) × Visit (hunger, satiety) revealed that, for the CW group, hunger significantly increased activation in reward salience circuitry (ventral striatum, dorsal caudate, anterior cingulate cortex) during processing of immediate reward, whereas satiety increased activation in cognitive control circuitry (ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, insula) during decision making. In contrast, brain response in reward and cognitive neurocircuitry did not differ during hunger and satiety in the RAN group. A main effect of group revealed elevated response in the middle frontal gyrus for the RAN group compared with the CW group. CONCLUSIONS:Women remitted from AN failed to increase activation of reward valuation circuitry when hungry and showed elevated response in cognitive control circuitry independent of metabolic state. Decreased sensitivity to the motivational drive of hunger may explain the ability of individuals with AN to restrict food when emaciated. Difficulties in valuating emotional salience may contribute to inabilities to appreciate the risks inherent in this disorder.
Authors: Joanna E Steinglass; Bernd Figner; Staci Berkowitz; H Blair Simpson; Elke U Weber; B Timothy Walsh Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Jodie Feil; Dianne Sheppard; Paul B Fitzgerald; Murat Yücel; Dan I Lubman; John L Bradshaw Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Ursula F Bailer; Guido K Frank; Julie C Price; Carolyn C Meltzer; Carl Becker; Chester A Mathis; Angela Wagner; Nicole C Barbarich-Marsteller; Cinnamon S Bloss; Karen Putnam; Nicholas J Schork; Anthony Gamst; Walter H Kaye Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Amanda Bischoff-Grethe; Danyale McCurdy; Emily Grenesko-Stevens; Laura E Zoe Irvine; Angela Wagner; Wai-Ying Wendy Yau; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Christina E Wierenga; Julie L Fudge; Mauricio R Delgado; Walter H Kaye Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: L A Berner; A N Simmons; C E Wierenga; A Bischoff-Grethe; M P Paulus; U F Bailer; A V Ely; W H Kaye Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Michael Amlung; Emma Marsden; Katherine Holshausen; Vanessa Morris; Herry Patel; Lana Vedelago; Katherine R Naish; Derek D Reed; Randi E McCabe Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Joanna E Steinglass; Karolina M Lempert; Tse-Hwei Choo; Marcia B Kimeldorf; Melanie Wall; B Timothy Walsh; Abby J Fyer; Franklin R Schneier; H Blair Simpson Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Xiaobei Zhang; Andrew James Melrose; Olivia De Santis; Shan Luo; Kathleen A Page; Eustace Hsu; John R Monterosso Journal: Nutr Res Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 3.315