Johannes Hugo Decker1, Bernd Figner2, Joanna E Steinglass3. 1. Sackler Institute of Developmental Psychobiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Electronic address: js1124@columbia.edu. 2. Behavioural Science Institute and Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Center for Decision Sciences , Columbia University. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) override the drive to eat, forgoing immediate rewards in favor of longer-term goals. We examined delay discounting and its neural correlates in AN before and after treatment to test a potential mechanism of illness persistence. METHODS: Inpatients with AN (n = 59) and healthy control subjects (HC, n = 39) performed a delay discounting task at two time points. A subset (n = 30 AN, n = 22 HC) participated in functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning during the task. The task consisted of a range of monetary choices with variable delay times, yielding individual discount rates-the rate by which money loses value over time. RESULTS: Before treatment, the AN group showed a preference for delayed over earlier rewards (i.e., less steep discount rates) compared with HC; after weight restoration, AN did not differ from HC. Underweight AN showed slower response times for earlier versus delayed choices; this reversed with treatment. Underweight AN showed abnormal neural activity in striatum and dorsal anterior cingulate; normalization of behavior was associated with increased activation in reward regions (striatum and dorsal anterior cingulate) and decision-making regions (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and parietal cortex). CONCLUSIONS: The undernourished state of AN may amplify the tendency to forgo immediate rewards in favor of longer-term goals. The results suggest that behavior that looks phenotypically like excessive self-control does not correspond with enhanced prefrontal recruitment. Rather, the results point to alterations in cingulostriatal circuitry that offer new insights on the potential role of abnormalities in decision-making neural systems in the perpetuation of AN.
BACKGROUND: Individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) override the drive to eat, forgoing immediate rewards in favor of longer-term goals. We examined delay discounting and its neural correlates in AN before and after treatment to test a potential mechanism of illness persistence. METHODS: Inpatients with AN (n = 59) and healthy control subjects (HC, n = 39) performed a delay discounting task at two time points. A subset (n = 30 AN, n = 22 HC) participated in functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning during the task. The task consisted of a range of monetary choices with variable delay times, yielding individual discount rates-the rate by which money loses value over time. RESULTS: Before treatment, the AN group showed a preference for delayed over earlier rewards (i.e., less steep discount rates) compared with HC; after weight restoration, AN did not differ from HC. Underweight AN showed slower response times for earlier versus delayed choices; this reversed with treatment. Underweight AN showed abnormal neural activity in striatum and dorsal anterior cingulate; normalization of behavior was associated with increased activation in reward regions (striatum and dorsal anterior cingulate) and decision-making regions (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and parietal cortex). CONCLUSIONS: The undernourished state of AN may amplify the tendency to forgo immediate rewards in favor of longer-term goals. The results suggest that behavior that looks phenotypically like excessive self-control does not correspond with enhanced prefrontal recruitment. Rather, the results point to alterations in cingulostriatal circuitry that offer new insights on the potential role of abnormalities in decision-making neural systems in the perpetuation of AN.
Authors: Joanna E Steinglass; Bernd Figner; Staci Berkowitz; H Blair Simpson; Elke U Weber; B Timothy Walsh Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Alexandre Y Dombrovski; Katalin Szanto; Greg J Siegle; Meredith L Wallace; Steven D Forman; Barbara Sahakian; Charles F Reynolds; Luke Clark Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Amanda Bischoff-Grethe; Danyale McCurdy; Emily Grenesko-Stevens; Laura E Zoe Irvine; Angela Wagner; Wai-Ying Wendy Yau; Christine Fennema-Notestine; Christina E Wierenga; Julie L Fudge; Mauricio R Delgado; Walter H Kaye Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Jiook Cha; Jaime S Ide; F Dubois Bowman; Helen B Simpson; Jonathan Posner; Joanna E Steinglass Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Michael Amlung; Emma Marsden; Katherine Holshausen; Vanessa Morris; Herry Patel; Lana Vedelago; Katherine R Naish; Derek D Reed; Randi E McCabe Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Mikhail N Koffarnus; Harshawardhan U Deshpande; Jonathan M Lisinski; Anders Eklund; Warren K Bickel; Stephen M LaConte Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Joanna E Steinglass; Karolina M Lempert; Tse-Hwei Choo; Marcia B Kimeldorf; Melanie Wall; B Timothy Walsh; Abby J Fyer; Franklin R Schneier; H Blair Simpson Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Fabio Bernardoni; Nadine Bernhardt; Shakoor Pooseh; Joseph A. King; Daniel Geisler; Franziska Ritschel; Ilka Boehm; Maria Seidel; Veit Roessner; Michael N. Smolka; Stefan Ehrlich Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 6.186