Literature DB >> 25481387

The influence of the dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) parameter on dosimetry with IPSA optimisation for HDR prostate brachytherapy.

Ryan L Smith1, Vanessa Panettieri, Craig Lancaster, Natasha Mason, Rick D Franich, Jeremy L Millar.   

Abstract

To investigate how the dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) parameter, applied to inverse planning by simulated annealing (IPSA) optimisation limits large dwell times from occurring in each catheter and to characterise the effect on the resulting dosimetry for prostate high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment plans. An unconstrained IPSA optimised treatment plan, using the Oncentra Brachytherapy treatment planning system (version 4.3, Nucletron an Elekta company, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), was generated for 20 consecutive HDR prostate brachytherapy patients, with the DTDC set to zero. Successive constrained optimisation plans were also created for each patient by increasing the DTDC parameter by 0.2, up to a maximum value of 1.0. We defined a "plan modulation index", to characterise the change of dwell time modulation as the DTDC parameter was increased. We calculated the dose volume histogram indices for the PTV (D90, V100, V150, V200%) and urethra (D10%) to characterise the effect on the resulting dosimetry. The average PTV D90% decreases as the DTDC is applied, on average by only 1.5 %, for a DTDC = 0.4. The measures of high dose regions in the PTV, V150 and V200%, increase on average by less than 5 and 2 % respectively. The net effect of DTDC on the modulation of dwell times has been characterised by the introduction of the plan modulation index. DTDC applied during IPSA optimisation of HDR prostate brachytherapy plans reduce the occurrence of large isolated dwell times within individual catheters. The mechanism by which DTDC works has been described and its effect on the modulation of dwell times has been characterised. The authors recommend using a DTDC parameter no greater than 0.4 to obtain a plan with dwell time modulation comparable to a geometric optimised plan. This yielded on average a 1.5 % decrease in PTV coverage and an acceptable increase in V150%, without compromising the urethral dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25481387     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-014-0317-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  8 in total

1.  An audit of high dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment planning at six Swedish clinics.

Authors:  Frida Dohlmar; Sakarias Johansson; Torbjörn Larsson; Michael Sandborg; Åsa Carlsson Tedgren
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-02-18

2.  Comparison of graphical optimization or IPSA for improving brachytheraphy plans associated with inadequate target coverage for cervical cancer.

Authors:  ZhiJie Liu; HuanQing Liang; Xiao Wang; HaiMing Yang; Ye Deng; TingJun Luo; ChaoFeng Yang; Min Lu; QingGuo Fu; XiaoDong Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Model assessment of individual tumor control rate and adverse effects in comparing locally advanced cervical cancer treatment using intracavitary with and without interstitial brachytherapy.

Authors:  Hsiang-Chi Kuo; Keyur J Mehta; Ravindra Yaparpalvi; Viswanathan Shankar; William Bodner; Madhur Garg; Amanda Rivera; Wolfgang A Tomé; Shalom Kalnicki
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-12-20

4.  Influence of dwell time homogeneity error weight parameter on treatment plan quality in inverse optimized high-dose-rate cervix brachytherapy using SagiPlan.

Authors:  Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi; Elham Shahcheraghi-Motlagh; Mohammad Hadi Gholami; Alireza Shakibafard; Sareh Karbasi; Reza Fardid
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-06-28

5.  Robustness of IPSA optimized high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans to catheter displacements.

Authors:  Joel Poder; May Whitaker
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-06-13

6.  Does inverse planning improve plan quality in interstitial high-dose-rate breast brachytherapy?

Authors:  Tibor Major; Georgina Fröhlich; Norbert Mészáros; Viktor Smanykó; Csaba Polgár
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-04-30

7.  An Inverse Dose Optimization Algorithm for Three-Dimensional Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Xianliang Wang; Pei Wang; Bin Tang; Shengwei Kang; Qing Hou; Zhangwen Wu; Chengjun Gou; Lintao Li; Lucia Orlandini; Jinyi Lang; Jie Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Comparison of two inverse planning algorithms for cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Qi Fu; Yingjie Xu; Jing Zuo; Jusheng An; Manni Huang; Xi Yang; Jiayun Chen; Hui Yan; Jianrong Dai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.