Sungmin Woo1, Sang Youn Kim2, Myoung Seok Lee1, Jeong Yeon Cho3, Seung Hyup Kim3. 1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea. Electronic address: iwishluv@empas.com. 3. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine and Kidney Research Institute, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul 110-744, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the intraobserver reproducibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was institutional review board approved with waiver of informed consent. Eighty men (mean age, 66.2±9.2years) with suspected prostate cancer underwent SWE. Young modulus (kPa) was measured at 24 locations in the prostate (superficial and deep locations in paramedian and lateral aspects at the base, mid-gland, and apex levels). The intraobserver reproducibility of two repeated measurements was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and was compared among measurement location, prostate volume, age, and prostate-specific antigen level. RESULTS: The overall intraobserver reproducibility was excellent (ICC=0.876). In addition, intraobserver reproducibility was excellent for all specified subgroups according to location, prostate volume, and clinical variables (ICC=0.826-0.917). With regard to location, SWE measurements showed substantially higher ICC values in the mid-gland than in the base and apex, in the paramedian prostate than in the lateral prostate, and in superficial locations than in deeper locations. No substantial differences in ICC values were observed according to the prostate volume and clinical variables. CONCLUSION: Intraobserver reproducibility of SWE measurements in the prostate gland was excellent. There was variability in the intraobserver reproducibility according to location within the prostate, and the operator should be aware of this and take extra caution when performing SWE in these areas.
PURPOSE: To assess the intraobserver reproducibility of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was institutional review board approved with waiver of informed consent. Eighty men (mean age, 66.2±9.2years) with suspected prostate cancer underwent SWE. Young modulus (kPa) was measured at 24 locations in the prostate (superficial and deep locations in paramedian and lateral aspects at the base, mid-gland, and apex levels). The intraobserver reproducibility of two repeated measurements was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and was compared among measurement location, prostate volume, age, and prostate-specific antigen level. RESULTS: The overall intraobserver reproducibility was excellent (ICC=0.876). In addition, intraobserver reproducibility was excellent for all specified subgroups according to location, prostate volume, and clinical variables (ICC=0.826-0.917). With regard to location, SWE measurements showed substantially higher ICC values in the mid-gland than in the base and apex, in the paramedian prostate than in the lateral prostate, and in superficial locations than in deeper locations. No substantial differences in ICC values were observed according to the prostate volume and clinical variables. CONCLUSION: Intraobserver reproducibility of SWE measurements in the prostate gland was excellent. There was variability in the intraobserver reproducibility according to location within the prostate, and the operator should be aware of this and take extra caution when performing SWE in these areas.
Authors: Jean-Michel Correas; Ethan J Halpern; Richard G Barr; Sangeet Ghai; Jochen Walz; Sylvain Bodard; Charles Dariane; Jean de la Rosette Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-04-18 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Markus Porsch; Claudia Görner; Johann Jakob Wendler; Uwe-Bernd Liehr; Anke Lux; Sandra Siedentopf; Martin Schostak; Maciej Pech Journal: J Ultrason Date: 2016-12-30