N Keum1, D H Lee2, R Kim3, D C Greenwood4, E L Giovannucci5. 1. Department of Nutrition and Epidemiology. Electronic address: nak212@mail.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Nutrition and Epidemiology. 3. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA. 4. Division of Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. 5. Department of Nutrition and Epidemiology; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity-related hormonal and metabolic perturbations implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis are mainly driven by visceral adipose tissue (VAT) rather than subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Yet, most epidemiologic studies have examined the relationship between excess adiposity and colorectal neoplasia using body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). Due to the inability of BMI and WC to distinguish VAT from SAT, they are likely to have underestimated the true association. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to summarize the relationships between VAT and colorectal adenomas and to examine the value of VAT as an independent risk factor beyond BMI, WC, and SAT. PubMed and Embase were searched through September 2014 to identify relevant observational studies. The summary odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: In linear dose-response meta-analysis, the summary OR for each 25 cm(2) increase in VAT area was 1.13 (95% CI 1.05-1.21; I(2) = 62%; 6 studies; 2776 cases; range of VAT area = 30-228 cm(2)). The dose-response curve suggested no evidence of nonlinearity (Pnon-linearity = 0.37). In meta-analysis comparing the highest versus lowest category of VAT based on 12 studies, a positive association between VAT and adenomas remained statistically significant even after adjustment for BMI, WC, and SAT. In contrast, adjustment for VAT substantially attenuated associations of BMI, WC, and SAT with adenomas. Across the studies, VAT was more strongly associated with advanced adenomas than nonadvanced adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: VAT may be the underlying mediator of the observed associations of BMI and WC with adenomas, increasing adenoma risk continuously over a wide range of VAT area. Considering that the joint use of BMI and WC better captures VAT than the use of either one, clinicians are recommended to use both BMI and WC to identify those at high risk for colorectal neoplasia.
BACKGROUND: Obesity-related hormonal and metabolic perturbations implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis are mainly driven by visceral adipose tissue (VAT) rather than subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Yet, most epidemiologic studies have examined the relationship between excess adiposity and colorectal neoplasia using body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). Due to the inability of BMI and WC to distinguish VAT from SAT, they are likely to have underestimated the true association. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to summarize the relationships between VAT and colorectal adenomas and to examine the value of VAT as an independent risk factor beyond BMI, WC, and SAT. PubMed and Embase were searched through September 2014 to identify relevant observational studies. The summary odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: In linear dose-response meta-analysis, the summary OR for each 25 cm(2) increase in VAT area was 1.13 (95% CI 1.05-1.21; I(2) = 62%; 6 studies; 2776 cases; range of VAT area = 30-228 cm(2)). The dose-response curve suggested no evidence of nonlinearity (Pnon-linearity = 0.37). In meta-analysis comparing the highest versus lowest category of VAT based on 12 studies, a positive association between VAT and adenomas remained statistically significant even after adjustment for BMI, WC, and SAT. In contrast, adjustment for VAT substantially attenuated associations of BMI, WC, and SAT with adenomas. Across the studies, VAT was more strongly associated with advanced adenomas than nonadvanced adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: VAT may be the underlying mediator of the observed associations of BMI and WC with adenomas, increasing adenoma risk continuously over a wide range of VAT area. Considering that the joint use of BMI and WC better captures VAT than the use of either one, clinicians are recommended to use both BMI and WC to identify those at high risk for colorectal neoplasia.
Authors: Loïc Le Marchand; Lynne R Wilkens; Ann M Castelfranco; Kristine R Monroe; Bruce S Kristal; Iona Cheng; Gertraud Maskarinec; Meredith A Hullar; Johanna W Lampe; John A Shepherd; Adrian Franke; Thomas Ernst; Unhee Lim Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Michael N Passarelli; Elizabeth L Barry; Judy R Rees; Leila A Mott; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Peter T Katzmarzyk; Justin C Brown; Shengping Yang; Emily F Mire; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lucio Miele; Augusto C Ochoa; Jovanny Zabaleta Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 4.090