Barbara Altieri1, Luigi Barrea2, Roberta Modica2, Filomena Bottiglieri2, Federica de Cicco2, Giovanna Muscogiuri2, Luisa Circelli3, Giovanni Savarese3, Carolina Di Somma2, Silvia Savastano2, Annamaria Colao2,4, Antongiulio Faggiano5. 1. Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. Altieri_B@ukw.de. 2. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Endocrinology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy. 3. AMES, Centro Diagnostico Strumentale, Naples, Italy. 4. UNESCO Chair "Education for Health and Sustainable Development", Federico II University, Naples, Italy. 5. Endocrinology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Data regarding vitamin D status in patients affected by gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumor (NET) are limited and often showing contrasting results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) in GEP-NET patients and compare the 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels with clinicopathological parameters and clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study including 75 low grade (G1-G2) GEP-NETs and 123 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and body mass index, was performed. RESULTS: GEP-NET patients had significantly lower 25(OH)D levels compared to controls (17.9 ± 7.8 vs 24.2 ± 7.7 ng/mL, p < 0.0001). Ileal NETs were associated to lower 25(OH)D levels compared to other primary tumor sites (p = 0.049) and small bowel resection posed a significant increased risk of severe vitamin D deficiency (OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.25-3.37, p = 0.018). No correlation with somatostatin analogs treatment was found. 25(OH)D levels were significantly lower in G2 compared to G1 GEP-NETs (15.6 ± 7.8 vs 19.9 ± 7.4 ng/mL, p = 0.016) and in patients with progressive disease (12.6 ± 5.7 ng/mL) compared to those with stable disease (mean 21.5 ± 8.2 ng/mL, p = 0.001) or tumor free after surgery (19.6 ± 7.3 ng/mL, p = 0.002). Patients with vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency had shorter progression-free survival compared to those with sufficiency (p = 0.014), whereas no correlation was found with disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent among GEP-NETs and could be associated with high tumor grade and disease progression. Therefore, the monitoring of 25(OH)D levels is relevant in these patients and vitamin D supplementation should be considered in the management of GEP-NET patients with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency.
PURPOSE: Data regarding vitamin D status in patients affected by gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumor (NET) are limited and often showing contrasting results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) in GEP-NET patients and compare the 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels with clinicopathological parameters and clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study including 75 low grade (G1-G2) GEP-NETs and 123 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and body mass index, was performed. RESULTS: GEP-NET patients had significantly lower 25(OH)D levels compared to controls (17.9 ± 7.8 vs 24.2 ± 7.7 ng/mL, p < 0.0001). Ileal NETs were associated to lower 25(OH)D levels compared to other primary tumor sites (p = 0.049) and small bowel resection posed a significant increased risk of severe vitamin D deficiency (OR = 2.81, 95% CI = 1.25-3.37, p = 0.018). No correlation with somatostatin analogs treatment was found. 25(OH)D levels were significantly lower in G2 compared to G1 GEP-NETs (15.6 ± 7.8 vs 19.9 ± 7.4 ng/mL, p = 0.016) and in patients with progressive disease (12.6 ± 5.7 ng/mL) compared to those with stable disease (mean 21.5 ± 8.2 ng/mL, p = 0.001) or tumor free after surgery (19.6 ± 7.3 ng/mL, p = 0.002). Patients with vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency had shorter progression-free survival compared to those with sufficiency (p = 0.014), whereas no correlation was found with disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent among GEP-NETs and could be associated with high tumor grade and disease progression. Therefore, the monitoring of 25(OH)D levels is relevant in these patients and vitamin D supplementation should be considered in the management of GEP-NET patients with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency.
Authors: Roger Bouillon; Claudio Marcocci; Geert Carmeliet; Daniel Bikle; John H White; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Paul Lips; Craig F Munns; Marise Lazaretti-Castro; Andrea Giustina; John Bilezikian Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Gregory P Hess; Chi-Chang Chen; Zhimei Liu; James C Yao; Alexandria T Phan; Jerrold W Hill Journal: Pancreas Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: S Chiloiro; F Lanza; A Bianchi; G Schinzari; M G Brizi; A Giampietro; V Rufini; F Inzani; A Giordano; G Rindi; A Pontecorvi; L De Marinis Journal: Endocrine Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: David Feldman; Aruna V Krishnan; Srilatha Swami; Edward Giovannucci; Brian J Feldman Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 60.716