Literature DB >> 25478701

Comparison of adaptation motifs: temporal, stochastic and spatial responses.

Pablo A Iglesias1, Changji Shi2.   

Abstract

The cells' ability to adapt to changes in the external environment is crucial for the survival of many organisms. There are two broad classes of signalling networks that achieve perfect adaptation. Both rely on complementary regulation of the response by an external signal and an inhibitory process. In one class of systems, inhibition comes about from the response itself, closing a negative feedback (NFB) loop. In the other, the inhibition comes directly from the external signal in what is referred to as an incoherent feedforward (IFF) loop. Although both systems show adaptive behaviour to constant changes in the level of the stimulus, their response to other forms of stimuli can differ. Here the authors consider the respective response to various such disturbances, including ramp increases, removal of the stimulus and pulses. The authors also consider the effect of stochastic fluctuations in signalling that come about from the interaction of the signalling elements. Finally, the authors consider the possible effect of spatially varying signals. The authors show that both the NFB and the IFF motifs can be used to sense static spatial gradients, under a local excitation, global inhibition assumption. The results may help experimentalists develop protocols that can discriminate between the two adaptation motifs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25478701      PMCID: PMC8687373          DOI: 10.1049/iet-syb.2014.0026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IET Syst Biol        ISSN: 1751-8849            Impact factor:   1.615


  49 in total

1.  Receptor-mediated activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins in living cells.

Authors:  C Janetopoulos; T Jin; P Devreotes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of a GATA transcription factor functions as a development timer.

Authors:  Huaqing Cai; Mariko Katoh-Kurasawa; Tetsuya Muramoto; Balaji Santhanam; Yu Long; Lei Li; Masahiro Ueda; Pablo A Iglesias; Gad Shaulsky; Peter N Devreotes
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Membrane tension maintains cell polarity by confining signals to the leading edge during neutrophil migration.

Authors:  Andrew R Houk; Alexandra Jilkine; Cecile O Mejean; Rostislav Boltyanskiy; Eric R Dufresne; Sigurd B Angenent; Steven J Altschuler; Lani F Wu; Orion D Weiner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Cellular sensory mechanisms for detecting specific fold-changes in extracellular cues.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Hironaka; Yoshihiro Morishita
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Incoherent feedforward control governs adaptation of activated ras in a eukaryotic chemotaxis pathway.

Authors:  Kosuke Takeda; Danying Shao; Micha Adler; Pascale G Charest; William F Loomis; Herbert Levine; Alex Groisman; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Richard A Firtel
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 8.192

6.  Klinokinesis in polymorphonuclear leucocytes.

Authors:  H U Keller; G Meier; A Zimmerman
Journal:  Blood Cells       Date:  1984

7.  The incoherent feedforward loop can provide fold-change detection in gene regulation.

Authors:  Lea Goentoro; Oren Shoval; Marc W Kirschner; Uri Alon
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Modeling the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli to time-varying stimuli.

Authors:  Yuhai Tu; Thomas S Shimizu; Howard C Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Defining network topologies that can achieve biochemical adaptation.

Authors:  Wenzhe Ma; Ala Trusina; Hana El-Samad; Wendell A Lim; Chao Tang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  How to understand and outwit adaptation.

Authors:  Oliver Hoeller; Delquin Gong; Orion D Weiner
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 12.270

View more
  9 in total

1.  Membrane Tension Can Enhance Adaptation to Maintain Polarity of Migrating Cells.

Authors:  Cole Zmurchok; Jared Collette; Vijay Rajagopal; William R Holmes
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Fold-change detection and scale invariance of cell-cell signaling in social amoeba.

Authors:  Keita Kamino; Yohei Kondo; Akihiko Nakajima; Mai Honda-Kitahara; Kunihiko Kaneko; Satoshi Sawai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Adaptation of Living Systems.

Authors:  Yuhai Tu; Wouter-Jan Rappel
Journal:  Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 16.109

4.  Adaptive information processing of network modules to dynamic and spatial stimuli.

Authors:  J Krishnan; Ioannis Floros
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2019-03-14

5.  Biomolecular mechanisms for signal differentiation.

Authors:  Emmanouil Alexis; Carolin C M Schulte; Luca Cardelli; Antonis Papachristodoulou
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-11-17

6.  Deciphering cell signaling networks with massively multiplexed biosensor barcoding.

Authors:  Jr-Ming Yang; Wei-Yu Chi; Jessica Liang; Saki Takayanagi; Pablo A Iglesias; Chuan-Hsiang Huang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Multi-bit Boolean model for chemotactic drift of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Anuj Deshpande; Sibendu Samanta; Sutharsan Govindarajan; Ritwik Kumar Layek
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.615

8.  Adaptive Responses Limited by Intrinsic Noise.

Authors:  Prabhat Shankar; Masatoshi Nishikawa; Tatsuo Shibata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Sensitivity minimization, biological homeostasis and information theory.

Authors:  Debojyoti Biswas; Pablo A Iglesias
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.086

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.