Literature DB >> 25478460

A novel approach for restoration of hemisectioned mandibular second molar with modified tunnel restoration: a case report.

Madhu Varma K1, Jyothi Chittem2, Kalyan Satish R1, Sita Rama Kumar M3, Girija S Sajjan4.   

Abstract

Hemisection refers to sectioning of a mandibular molar into two halves followed by removal of the diseased root and its coronal portion. Hemisection of a mandibular molar may be a suitable treatment option when the decay is restricted to one root and the other root is healthy. The retained root is endodontically treated and the furcation area is made self-cleansable. Retained tooth structure is restored as premolar which helps to reduce the masticatory load. Hemisection of mandibular molar was often referred to as premolarization. Studies showed that the remaining coronal structure influenced the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary first premolars. Clinical experience showed the viability of tunnel restoration as an alternative to class II conventional cavity preparation in initial proximal lesion. This article discusses a case that presents the novel technique involved in restoration of the remaining hemisected tooth using modified tunnel restoration.

Keywords:  Hemisection; Mandibular molars; Root canal treatment; Tunnel restoration

Year:  2014        PMID: 25478460      PMCID: PMC4253278          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9519.4955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  14 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of conservative operative caries management strategies.

Authors:  D McComb
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  The tunnel restoration--nine years of clinical experience using capsulated glass ionomer cements. Case report.

Authors:  G M Knight
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.291

3.  Hemisection as an alternative treatment for vertically fractured mandibular molars.

Authors:  Gregori M Kurtzman; Lee H Silverstein; Peter C Shatz
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2006-02

4.  Effect of remaining coronal structure on the resistance to fracture of crowned endodontically treated maxillary first premolars.

Authors:  Joseph Nissan; Eitan Barnea; Doron Bar Hen; David Assif
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.677

5.  Mandibular molar root resection versus implant therapy: a retrospective nonrandomized study.

Authors:  Gregory-George Zafiropoulos; Oliver Hoffmann; Adrian Kasaj; Brita Willershausen; Giorgio Deli; Dimitris N Tatakis
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Marginal ridge strength in Class II tunnel restorations.

Authors:  D J Fasbinder; R D Davis; J O Burgess
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.522

7.  Hemisection as an alternative treatment for decayed multirooted terminal abutment: a case report.

Authors:  M Najeeb Saad; Jorge Moreno; Cameron Crawford
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Strength of tunnel-restored teeth with different materials and marginal ridge height.

Authors:  Wei Ji; Zhi Chen; Jo E Frencken
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: three walls versus four walls of remaining coronal tooth structure.

Authors:  Siriporn Arunpraditkul; Siranee Saengsanon; Wilasinee Pakviwat
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  The effect of amount of lost tooth structure and restorative technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars.

Authors:  Mahshid Mohammadi Bassir; Akram Labibzadeh; Fatemeh Mollaverdi
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.