Literature DB >> 25477939

Evaluation of culture media for selective enumeration of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria.

Judit Süle1, Tímea Kõrösi2, Attila Hucker2, László Varga1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the suitability of Transgalactosylated oligosaccharides-mupirocin lithium salt (TOS-MUP) and MRS-clindamycin-ciprofloxacin (MRS-CC) agars, along with several other culture media, for selectively enumerating bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) species commonly used to make fermented milks. Pure culture suspensions of a total of 13 dairy bacteria strains, belonging to eight species and five genera, were tested for growth capability under various incubation conditions. TOS-MUP agar was successfully used for the selective enumeration of both Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and B. breve M-16 V. MRS-CC agar showed relatively good selectivity for Lactobacillus acidophilus, however, it also promoted the growth of Lb. casei strains. For this reason, MRS-CC agar can only be used as a selective medium for the enumeration of Lb. acidophilus if Lb. casei is not present in a product at levels similar to or exceeding those of Lb. acidophilus. Unlike bifidobacteria and coccus-shaped LAB, all the lactobacilli strains involved in this work were found to grow well in MRS pH 5.4 agar incubated under anaerobiosis at 37 °C for 72 h. Therefore, this method proved to be particularly suitable for the selective enumeration of Lactobacillus spp.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bifidobacterium; Lactobacillus acidophilus; ciprofloxacin; clindamycin; mupirocin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25477939      PMCID: PMC4204943          DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000300035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Microbiol        ISSN: 1517-8382            Impact factor:   2.476


Introduction

Nobel laureate Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov proposed more than a century ago that the regular consumption of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in fermented milks was responsible for improved health and longevity in Bulgarian farmer populations (Anukam and Reid, 2007). Since then, a considerable interest has been shown in the microorganisms of cultured dairy foods because of their capacity to decrease the risk of certain diseases (Zacarchenco and Massaguer-Roig, 2004). During the past three decades, various bifidobacteria and lactobacilli species have received attention as probiotic organisms (Zacarchenco and Massaguer-Roig, 2006). They have been associated with health-promoting effects and, thus, have been incorporated into a wide range of dairy foods worldwide (Ashraf and Shah, 2011; Karimi ). It is estimated that at least 500 newly developed probiotic products have been brought to the market globally over the last 10 years (Ashraf and Shah, 2011). The numerous health benefits reported for Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. include: contribution to a faster recolonization of the intestinal microbiota after administration of antibiotics, treatment and prevention of diarrhoea, alleviation of constipation, possible treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, reduction in lactose intolerance in some individuals, reduction in serum cholesterol level, increased resistance to microbial infections, impact on immune function, and potential role in cancer prevention (Leahy ; Möller and De Vrese, 2004; Moriya ; Varga, 1999; Zavisic ). The therapeutic effects exerted by probiotic bacteria are dependent on the number of viable microbial cells reaching the human gut (Ghoddusi and Hassan, 2011; Leahy ). Regulatory authorities around the world are looking for assurance that a probiotic product can deliver viable microorganisms at sufficient numbers to the large intestine in order to provide a benefit to the consumer. Concentrations of at least 106 colony forming units (cfu) per gram should be present at the time of consumption if a health claim is to be made (Ashraf and Shah, 2011; Codex Alimentarius Hungaricus Commission, 2004; Gläser, 1992; Karimi ; Sanders and Huis in’t Veld, 1999; Shah, 2000; Van de Casteele ). Unlike classic yogurt bacteria, probiotic organisms grow slowly in milk and, therefore, Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus are often added to cultured milks to speed up the fermentation process (Ashraf and Shah, 2011; Tharmaraj and Shah, 2003). For technological or other reasons, lactobacilli and bifidobacteria are sometimes also used in combination with mesophilic lactic/aromatic cultures, such as lactococci (i.e., Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris, and Lc. lactis subsp. lactis biovar. diacetylactis) and leuconostocs (e.g., Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. cremoris) to make probiotic buttermilk or similar fermented dairy foods (Antunes ; Paraschiv ; Rodas ). Simple, reliable, and inexpensive methods are needed to ensure that the required minimum numbers of probiotic bacteria — and those of yogurt starter organisms and mesophilic lactic/aromatic cultures as well — are present in commercial fermented milks (Ashraf and Shah, 2011; Saccaro ). However, the presence of multiple and phylogenetically closely related species in these products makes the differential or selective enumeration of probiotic organisms and starter bacteria difficult because of the similarity in growth requirements and overlapping biochemical profiles of the species. Despite the fact that culture-independent molecular tools for the quantification of probiotic organisms in commercial products have recently been developed (García-Cayuela ; Matijašiæ ; Reimann ; Tabasco ), food manufacturers still tend to rely on conventional plating techniques for enumeration purposes (Elahi ; Fachin ; Miranda ; Tharmaraj and Shah, 2003; Van de Casteele ). A wide range of culture media have been described for selective and differential enumeration of probiotic bacteria in mixed populations, and these have been the subject of comprehensive reviews (Ashraf and Shah, 2011; Charteris ; Karimi ; Roy, 2001; Shah, 2000; Tabasco ; Van de Casteele ). It is worth pointing out that differential enumeration of LAB and bifidobacteria species is mostly based on visual observation of colonies. However, colony morphology is a relatively unstable phenotypic trait. For this reason, selective media should be preferred for enumeration purposes (Saccaro ; Talwalkar and Kailasapathy, 2004; Van de Casteele ). In a study published in 2004, Australian authors demonstrated the unsuitability of commercially available culture media to reliably enumerate various types of probiotic bacteria in commercial fermented milks (Talwalkar and Kailasapathy, 2004). The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Dairy Federation (IDF) have jointly published international standards wherein MRS-clindamycin-ciprofloxacin (MRS-CC) agar and Transgalactosylated oligosaccharides-mupirocin lithium salt (TOS-MUP) agar are recommended for the selective enumeration of presumptive Lb. acidophilus and bifidobacteria, respectively, in milk products including fermented and non-fermented milks, milk powders, and infant formulae (ISO and IDF, 2006, 2010). The objective of this research was to test the suitability of TOS-MUP and MRS-CC agars, along with several other culture media, for selectively enumerating bifidobacteria and thermophilic and mesophilic LAB species commonly used in the dairy industry to manufacture fermented dairy foods. To our knowledge, this is the first single study evaluating the selective properties of both TOS-MUP and MRS-CC agars.

Materials and Methods

Bacteria cultures and propagation

Streptococcus thermophilus TH-4, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus YC-X11 (isolated from FD-DVS YC-X11 Yo-Flex® yogurt culture), Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CH-2, Lb. acidophilus LA-5, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 were kindly supplied by Chr. Hansen (Hørsholm, Denmark). Bifidobacterium breve M-16 V was obtained from Morinaga Milk Industry (Tokyo, Japan). Streptococcus thermophilus DSM 20479 was received from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (Braunschweig, Germany). Lactobacillus acidophilus NCAIM B.02085 and Lb. casei NCAIM B.01137 were provided by the National Collection of Agricultural and Industrial Microorganisms (Budapest, Hungary). Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis ATCC 19435 and Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum ATCC 19255 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Virginia, USA). Lactobacillus casei HDRI-R and Lc. lactis subsp. lactis biovar. diacetylactis VK-256 were obtained from the culture collection of the Hungarian Dairy Research Institute (Mosonmagyaróvár, Hungary). All these cultures were tested for purity by Gram stain and observation of cell morphology under a KF 2 ICS transmitted light microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany). All strains were maintained at −30 °C using the MicrobankTM low-temperature microbial preservation system (Pro-Lab Diagnostics, Neston, United Kingdom). Organisms were retrieved from cryovials containing a special cryopreservative solution and porous beads, and were subcultured twice in enrichment media, i.e., Casein-peptone Soymeal-peptone (CASO) broth or MRS broth. CASO broth, a universal culture medium free from inhibitors, contained 17.0 g of pancreatic digest of casein, 3.0 g of papaic digest of soybean meal, 5.0 g of sodium chloride, 2.5 g of dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, 2.5 g of glucose, 1.0 g of skimmed milk powder, and 1000 mL of distilled water. The final pH of CASO broth was 7.3 ± 0.2 at 25 °C. Commercial MRS broth (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was rehydrated in distilled water according to manufacturer’s instructions, and hydrochloric acid (1 M HCl) was added to adjust the pH of the medium to 6.2 ± 0.2 at 25 °C. Both enrichment broths were sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 15 min before use. Streptococcus thermophilus TH-4 and S. thermophilus DSM 20479 were propagated in CASO broth at 37 °C for 48 h under aerobic conditions; Lc. lactis subsp. lactis ATCC 19435, Lc. lactis subsp. lactis biovar. diacetylactis VK-256, and Ln. mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum ATCC 19255 were grown in CASO broth at 30 °C for 72 h aerobically; whereas the rest of the strains tested in this study were incubated in MRS broth at 37 °C for 72 h in anaerobiosis. Anaerobic conditions were generated using anaerobic culture jars (2.5 L) and AnaeroGen AN 25 sachets (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). The pure culture suspensions thus prepared were used to test the performance of various culture media.

Culture media

Bacteriological peptone diluent: Bacteriological peptone diluent (0.1%) was prepared by dissolving 1 g of peptone (Oxoid) in 1000 mL of distilled water. The pH value was adjusted to 7.0 ± 0.2 at 25 °C, followed by autoclaving 9 mL aliquots at 121 °C for 15 min. CASO agar: The Casein-peptone soymeal-peptone agar with powdered milk contained (per liter) 15.0 g of pancreatic digest of casein, 5.0 g of papaic digest of soybean meal, 5.0 g of sodium chloride, and 15.0 g of agar, which was supplemented with 1.0 g of skimmed milk powder, 1.0 g of glucose, 4.0 g of yeast extract, and 5.0 mL of Tween® 80. The ingredients were suspended in 1000 mL of distilled water, then mixed thoroughly and heated to boiling point under frequent agitation. The medium was dispensed into bottles and sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 15 min. The final pH was 7.3 ± 0.2 at 25 °C. M17 agar: In accordance with manufacturer’s instructions, 55 g of commercial M17 agar (Merck), which contained 5.0 g of lactose monohydrate, was suspended in 1000 mL of distilled water, then mixed thoroughly and brought gently to the boil under frequent agitation. The medium was dispensed into bottles and sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 15 min. Final pH was 6.8 ± 0.2 at 25 °C. MRS pH 5.4 agar and MRS pH 6.2 agar: Commercial MRS agar (Merck) was rehydrated in distilled water according to manufacturer’s instructions, and 1 M HCl was used to adjust the pH of the medium to 5.4 or 6.2. The agar media were sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 15 min. MRS-CC agar: Commercial MRS agar (Merck) was rehydrated in distilled water according to manufacturer’s instructions. It was distributed in portions of 200 mL into bottles of 250 mL capacity and sterilized in a Varioklav 500E autoclave (H+P Labortechnik, Oberschleißheim, Germany) set at 121 °C for 15 min. The final pH was 6.2 ± 0.2 at 25 °C. Simultaneously, 2.0 mg of clindamycin hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Loius, Missouri, USA) and 20.0 mg of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich) were dissolved separately in two 10.0-mL aliquots of distilled water. Both solutions were then sterilized by filtering through a 0.22-μm membrane filter (Millipore, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA). Immediately before pouring, 0.1 mL of clindamycin stock solution and 1.0 mL of ciprofloxacin stock solution were added to 200 mL of MRS agar cooled to between 44 °C and 47 °C. Thus, the complete MRS-clindamycin-ciprofloxacin (MRS-CC) agar had final clindamycin and ciprofloxacin concentrations of 0.1 mg/L and 10.0 mg/L, respectively. TOS-MUP agar: The basic medium, TOS-propionate agar, was obtained from Merck. It contained (per liter) 10.0 g of peptone from casein, 1.0 g of yeast extract, 3.0 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate, 4.8 g of dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, 3.0 g of ammonium sulphate, 0.2 g of magnesium sulphate heptahydrate, 0.5 g of L-cysteine monochloride, 15.0 g of sodium propionate, 10.0 g of galactooligosaccharide (TOS), and 15.0 g of agar. The ingredients were suspended in 950 mL of distilled water while being heated carefully with frequent agitation until completely dissolved. The basic medium was dispensed in 190-mL aliquots into 250-mL bottles and sterilized by autoclaving at 115 °C for 15 min. The final pH was 6.3 ± 0.2 at 25 °C. Simultaneously, 50 mg of lithium-mupirocin (MUP) selective supplement (Merck) was dissolved in 50 mL of distilled water, and the solution was sterilized by filtration through a membrane with pore diameter of 0.22 μm (Millipore). Immediately before pouring, at 48 °C ± 1 °C, 10 mL of MUP supplement solution was added to each 190 mL of TOS-propionate agar by using a syringe equipped with a sterile filter unit of 0.22-μm pore size (Millipore). The complete Transgalactosylated oligosaccharides-mupirocin lithium salt (TOS-MUP) agar thus had a final MUP concentration of 50 mg/L.

Enumeration of bacteria

One milliliter of each pure culture suspension was tenfold serially diluted (106 to 109) in 0.1% sterile bacteriological peptone diluent. Enumeration was carried out as specified in Table 1 using the pour plate technique. Anaerobic culture jars and AnaeroGen AN 25 sachets (Oxoid) were used for creating anaerobic conditions. Plates containing 25 to 250 colonies were enumerated and recorded as cfu/mL of culture suspension. The number of replicate samples was two, and the experimental program was repeated twice.
Table 1

Incubation conditions applied in the medium evaluation study.

Culture medium*IncubationAtmospheric conditions

temperature (°C)time (h)
CASO agar3772Anaerobic
CASO agar3748Aerobic
CASO agar3072Aerobic
TOS-MUP agar3772Anaerobic
MRS-CC agar3772Anaerobic
MRS pH 6.2 agar3772Anaerobic
MRS pH 5.4 agar3772Anaerobic
MRS pH 5.4 agar4548Anaerobic
M17 agar3748Aerobic
M17 agar4524Aerobic

For composition and/or preparation of culture media, see subsection “Culture media”.

Incubation conditions applied in the medium evaluation study. For composition and/or preparation of culture media, see subsection “Culture media”.

Statistical analysis

The results were logarithmically transformed to normalize the distributions and were then subjected to ANOVA using the general linear model procedure of STATISTICA data analysis software system, version 9.0 (StatSoft, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA). Significant differences among the log10 cfu/mL means were determined by using Duncan’s multiple comparison test at p < 0.05 (StatSoft).

Results and Discussion

The results of our medium evaluation study are shown in Table 2. Milk powder-supplemented CASO agar, which was used as a reference medium, supported the growth of all the 13 dairy bacteria strains tested.
Table 2

Evaluation of various culture media and incubation conditions for enumerating pure cultures of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria strains*.

#Bacterial species and strainCulture medium, incubation temperature, incubation time, and atmospheric conditions

CASO agarTOS-MUP agar, 37 °C, 72 h, anaerobicMRS-CC agar, 37 °C, 72 h, anaerobicMRS pH 6.2 agar, 37 °C, 72 h, anaerobicMRS pH 5.4 agar, 37 °C, 72 h, anaerobicMRS pH 5.4 agar, 45 °C, 48 h, anaerobicM17 agar, 37 °C, 48 h, aerobicM17 agar, 45 °C, 24 h, aerobic
1Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-128.33 ± 0.18b9.30 ± 0.12a< 6.008.07 ± 0.14b< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00
2Bifidobacterium breve M-16 V8.05 ± 0.11c8.76 ± 0.02a< 6.008.61 ± 0.04b< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00
3Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-58.20 ± 0.05b< 6.008.30 ± 0.10ab8.34 ± 0.02a8.33 ± 0.02a8.42 ± 0.11a7.84 ± 0.07c< 6.00
4Lactobacillus acidophilus NCAIM B.020858.22 ± 0.06b< 6.008.54 ± 0.17a8.54 ± 0.04a8.54 ± 0.03a8.51 ± 0.14a8.17 ± 0.09b< 6.00
5Lactobacillus casei NCAIM B.011377.70 ± 0.19a< 6.007.30 ± 0.24a7.58 ± 0.08a7.56 ± 0.08a< 6.007.76 ± 0.28a7.45 ± 0.17a
6Lactobacillus casei HDRI-R7.86 ± 0.15a< 6.007.88 ± 0.18a7.80 ± 0.17a7.64 ± 0.12a< 6.007.20 ± 0.15b7.30 ± 0.11b
7Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus YC-X116.30 ± 0.18b< 6.00< 6.006.78 ± 0.05a6.48 ± 0.09b< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00
8Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CH-26.70 ± 0.18b< 6.00< 6.007.11 ± 0.09a6.30 ± 0.33b< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00
9Streptococcus thermophilus TH-47.43 ± 0.12a< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00< 6.007.57 ± 0.13a6.78 ± 0.18b
10Streptococcus thermophilus DSM 204798.05 ± 0.22a< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00< 6.007.89 ± 0.17a6.90 ± 0.18b
11Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis ATCC 194357.98 ± 0.17a< 6.00< 6.007.81 ± 0.07a< 6.00< 6.007.71 ± 0.19a< 6.00
12Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar. diacetylactis VK-2567.18 ± 0.12a< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00< 6.006.30 ± 0.27b< 6.00
13Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum ATCC 192557.80 ± 0.18a< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00< 6.00

Values are log10 cfu/mL means ± SD based on four observations (two samples, two replicates).

Means within a row without a common superscript differ (p < 0.05).

For composition and/or preparation of culture media, see subsection “Culture media”.

Incubated at 37 °C for 72 h anaerobically (strain #1 to #8), at 37 °C for 48 h aerobically (strain #9 and #10), or at 30 °C for 72 h under aerobic conditions (strain #11 to #13).

Evaluation of various culture media and incubation conditions for enumerating pure cultures of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria strains*. Values are log10 cfu/mL means ± SD based on four observations (two samples, two replicates). Means within a row without a common superscript differ (p < 0.05). For composition and/or preparation of culture media, see subsection “Culture media”. Incubated at 37 °C for 72 h anaerobically (strain #1 to #8), at 37 °C for 48 h aerobically (strain #9 and #10), or at 30 °C for 72 h under aerobic conditions (strain #11 to #13). Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and B. breve M-16 V only grew well in CASO, TOS-MUP, and MRS pH 6.2 agars incubated at 37 °C for 72 h under anaerobic conditions. It is worth mentioning that TOS-MUP agar was superior (p < 0.05) to both CASO and MRS pH 6.2 agars — and all the other media screened in this research, for that matter — in terms of selectivity and recovery of bifidobacteria. Both strains of Lb. acidophilus (i.e., LA-5 and NCAIM B.02085) showed good growth in the majority of culture media, except in M17 agar incubated at 45 °C for 24 h under aerobic conditions and in TOS-MUP agar. Similar observations were made for Lb. casei NCAIM B.01137 and HDRI-R, which were present in high numbers in six of the eight media (methods) tested; however, they failed to form detectable numbers of colonies (i.e., ≥ 106 cfu/mL) in TOS-MUP and MRS pH 5.4 agars incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 72 h and at 45 °C for 48 h, respectively. Yogurt starter lactobacilli, Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CH-2 and YC-X11, were only found to grow in CASO and MRS agars incubated under anaerobiosis at 37 °C. MRS pH 6.2 agar yielded significantly higher (p < 0.05) Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus counts than did MRS pH 5.4 agar, but both culture media proved to be suitable for the enumeration of Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus. Surprisingly enough, however, this organism did not grow well in anaerobically incubated MRS pH 5.4 agar at 45 °C. Most probably, extension of the incubation period from 48 h to 72 h would have allowed sufficient growth of the strains tested, because in a previous trial by Dave and Shah (1996) Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus could be selectively enumerated in MRS pH 5.2 agar incubated at 45 °C for ≥ 72 h. Besides the reference medium, only M17 agar was capable of promoting the growth of S. thermophilus TH-4 and DSM 20479. It must be noted, however, that CASO and M17 agars incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 48 h yielded approximately 1 log cycle higher (p < 0.05) S. thermophilus counts than aerobically incubated M17 agar at 45 °C for 24 h. In general, recovery rates of the mesophilic LAB strains tested were rather low in the culture media involved in this study. This must have been due to the fact that, aside from CASO agar, media were incubated at temperatures higher than 30 °C. The optimum growth temperature range for mesophilic LAB is approximately 25 °C to 31 °C, with most species growing generally faster at 25 °C than at 31 °C (Sohrabvandi ). Not surprisingly, lactococci grew well in M17 agar at 37 °C. In addition, Lc. lactis subsp. lactis ATCC 19435 also formed comparable numbers of colonies in MRS pH 6.2 agar at 37 °C even under anaerobic conditions. This is in agreement with the findings of Antunes who reported that the CHN-22 mesophilic aromatic culture reached viable cell counts as high as 108 cfu/mL in MRS-based selective media incubated at 37 °C. Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum ATCC 19255 could, however, only be enumerated using the reference medium. It is clearly visible in Table 2 that TOS-MUP agar was successfully used for the selective enumeration of bifidobacteria. Both B. animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and B. breve M-16 V showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) viable cell counts in this medium than in CASO agar, and none of the 11 LAB strains tested were capable of forming detectable numbers of colonies (i.e., ≥ 106 cfu/mL) in TOS-MUP agar. Recent studies also indicated that mupirocin agars such as Wilkins-Chalgren agar containing 100 mg/L of mupirocin (Rada and Koc, 2000), MRS agar fortified with cysteine hydrochloride (0.05%, w/v) and mupirocin at 50 mg/L (Simpson ), and Transoligosaccharide propionate agar supplemented with 50 mg/L of mupirocin (Ghoddusi and Hassan, 2011; ISO and IDF, 2010; Kolakowski ) are the most suitable media for isolation and selective enumeration of bifidobacteria in fermented dairy products containing other LAB. Bifidobacterium spp. were reported to exhibit high mupirocin resistance, with all the 40 bifidobacterial strains, belonging to a total of 30 species, tested by Serafini giving MIC values in excess of 1,000 mg/L. MRS-CC agar showed relatively good selectivity for Lb. acidophilus; however, it also supported the growth of Lb. casei strains. For this reason, MRS-CC agar can only be used as a selective medium for the enumeration of Lb. acidophilus if Lb. casei is not present in a product at levels comparable to or exceeding those of Lb. acidophilus. Similar observations were recently made by Saccaro regarding Lb. acidophilus and Lb. casei in MRS-clindamycin agar containing the antibiotic at a concentration of 0.5 mg/L. These findings are somewhat surprising because MRS-clindamycin agar is considered to be an optimum medium for the selective enumeration of Lb. acidophilus grown in co-culture with yogurt starter organisms and other commercial probiotic strains (Van de Casteele ). It is well known, however, that Lb. acidophilus is rather difficult to enumerate selectively in mixed populations because the majority of the media supporting the growth of Lb. acidophilus also promote Lb. rhamnosus and Lb. casei (Lima ; Tharmaraj and Shah, 2003). Incubated at 37 °C, the nonselective MRS media provided optimum growth conditions for many of the strains. Unlike bifidobacteria and coccus-shaped LAB, all the lactobacilli strains tested in this study were found to grow well in MRS pH 5.4 agar incubated under anaerobiosis at 37 °C for 72 h. Therefore, this method appears particularly suitable for the selective enumeration of Lactobacillus spp. As shown in Table 2, MRS pH 5.4 agar incubated anaerobically at 45 °C for 48 h proved to be selective for Lb. acidophilus. This is in agreement with a previous work performed by Tharmaraj and Shah (2003) who reported that Lb. acidophilus could be enumerated using MRS agar at 43 °C for 72 h under anaerobic incubation. Similarly, in another experiment aimed at comparing the growth capability of probiotic and non-probiotic cultures in a wide range of culture media, MRS pH 5.4 agar presented the best performance in determining the viable counts of Lb. acidophilus LA-5 (Lima ). By contrast, Dave and Shah (1996) found MRS pH 5.2 agar to be suitable for selective enumeration of Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus when the plates were incubated at 45 °C for at least 72 h. Under aerobic incubation at 37 °C for 48 h, M17 agar lacked selectivity, promoting the growth of the majority of LAB strains screened in this investigation. An increase of 8 °C in incubation temperature with a simultaneous decrease in incubation time, from 48 h to 24 h, resulted in an improvement in the selectivity of this medium. Besides S. thermophilus, only Lb. casei strains were observed to grow in M17 agar incubated at 45 °C for 24 h under aerobiosis. These findings are basically in accordance with those of Tabasco who successfully used M17 agar, incubated in aerobiosis at 45 °C for 24 h, for the selective enumeration of S. thermophilus. Extension of the incubation period to 48 h, however, allowed the appearance of pinpoint colonies of Lb. acidophilus (Tabasco ). It is strongly emphasized that this work was carried out using pure culture suspensions of starter and probiotic bacteria. When real food samples are examined, culture medium selection should be carefully considered on a case to case basis. The choice of methodology for selective enumeration of LAB and bifidobacteria is supposed to be a function of the product matrix, the target species or strains, and the composition of the bacterial background flora in the specific food product tested (Van de Casteele ).

Conclusions

TOS-MUP agar was found to be capable of selectively enumerating Bifidobacterium spp., and can therefore be used to determine the viable counts of bifidobacteria in food products containing mixed populations of this organism and various LAB species, including S. thermophilus, Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Lb. acidophilus, Lb. casei, Lc. lactis, and Ln. mesenteroides subsp. dextranicum. Lactobacillus acidophilus could be selectively enumerated in MRS pH 5.4 agar incubated anaerobically at 45 °C for 48 h. The recently developed MRS-CC agar was also successfully employed for the same purpose unless Lb. casei was present at concentrations similar to or exceeding those of Lb. acidophilus. MRS pH 5.4 agar incubated at 37 °C for 72 h under anaerobiosis was selective for Lactobacillus spp. The viable cell counts of classic yogurt bacteria, S. thermophilus and Lb. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, could be selectively determined by using M17 agar (37 °C, 48 h, aerobiosis) and MRS agars (37 °C, 72 h, anaerobiosis), respectively. For selective enumeration of starter organisms and probiotic bacteria in ABT-type fermented milks, use of the following culture media is recommended under the incubation conditions described in this study: MRS-CC agar or MRS pH 5.4 agar for Lb. acidophilus, TOS-MUP agar for bifidobacteria, and M17 agar (45 °C, 24 h, aerobiosis) for S. thermophilus.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Probiotic bacteria: selective enumeration and survival in dairy foods.

Authors:  N P Shah
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 2.  Media for the isolation and enumeration of bifidobacteria in dairy products.

Authors:  D Roy
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  The evaluation of a mupirocin-based selective medium for the enumeration of bifidobacteria from probiotic animal feed.

Authors:  P J Simpson; G F Fitzgerald; C Stanton; R P Ross
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 4.  Getting better with bifidobacteria.

Authors:  S C Leahy; D G Higgins; G F Fitzgerald; D van Sinderen
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  Development of a real-time RT-PCR method for enumeration of viable Bifidobacterium longum cells in different morphologies.

Authors:  Sebastian Reimann; Franck Grattepanche; Enea Rezzonico; Christophe Lacroix
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.516

6.  Enumeration of bifidobacteria using Petrifilm™ AC in pure cultures and in a fermented milk manufactured with a commercial culture of Streptococcus thermophilus.

Authors:  Rodrigo Otávio Miranda; Gabriel Gama Neto; Rosangela de Freitas; Antônio Fernandes de Carvalho; Luís Augusto Nero
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 5.516

7.  Evaluation of media for selective enumeration of Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and bifidobacteria.

Authors:  R I Dave; N P Shah
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Selective enumeration of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and propionibacteria.

Authors:  N Tharmaraj; N P Shah
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Evaluation of culture media for counts of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bb 12in yoghurt after refrigerated storage.

Authors:  Luciano Fachin; Juliana Moryia; Ana Lourdes Neves Gândara; Walkiria Hanada Viotto
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

10.  Probiotic features of two oral Lactobacillus isolates.

Authors:  Gordana Zavisic; Sasa Petricevic; Zeljka Radulovic; Jelena Begovic; Natasa Golic; Ljubisa Topisirovic; Ivana Strahinic
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

View more
  14 in total

1.  Methods for Isolation and Recovery of Bifidobacteria.

Authors:  Abelardo Margolles; Lorena Ruiz
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Microencapsulation May Preserve the Viability of Probiotic Bacteria During a Baking Process and Digestion: A Case Study with Bifidobacterium animalis Subsp. lactis in Bread.

Authors:  Adel Penhasi; Albert Reuveni; Israel Baluashvili
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Probiotic Foods Are Effective on Weight Loss, Biochemical Parameters, and Intestinal Microbiota in Wistar Albino Rats with Obese Microbiota.

Authors:  Nadide Gizem Tarakci; Nihal Zekiye Erdem; Emek Dumen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.149

4.  Influence of Taxonomic and Functional Content of Microbial Communities on the Quality of Fermented Cocoa Pulp-Bean Mass.

Authors:  Jatziri Mota-Gutierrez; Ilario Ferrocino; Manuela Giordano; Mirna Leonor Suarez-Quiroz; Oscar Gonzalez-Ríos; Luca Cocolin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Complete Genome Sequence of Bacillus coagulans BC01, a Promising Human Probiotic Strain Isolated from Thick Broad Bean Sauce.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Xueping Yu; Jialiang Ouyang; Xin Ma
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2021-05-13

6.  Growth kinetic models of five species of Lactobacilli and lactose consumption in batch submerged culture.

Authors:  Fazlollah Rezvani; Fatemeh Ardestani; Ghasem Najafpour
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 2.476

7.  Isolation and characterization of high exopolysaccharide-producing Weissella confusa VP30 from young children's feces.

Authors:  Hui Jin; Yunju Jeong; Sang-Ho Yoo; Tony V Johnston; Seockmo Ku; Geun Eog Ji
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.328

8.  Identification and characterisation of the lactic acid bacteria associated with the traditional fermentation of dairy fermented product.

Authors:  Promiselynda Ijeoma Obioha; L Irene I Ouoba; Amarachukwu Anyogu; Brigitte Awamaria; Sarah Atchia; Philippa C Ojimelukwe; Jane P Sutherland; Hamid B Ghoddusi
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.476

9.  Fortification of Acidophilus-bifidus-thermophilus (ABT) Fermented Milk with Heat-Treated Industrial Yeast Enhances Its Selected Properties.

Authors:  Fouad M F Elshaghabee; Ahmed A Abd El-Maksoud; Sulaiman Ali Alharbi; Saleh Alfarraj; Mahmoud S M Mohamed
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Antimicrobial Efficacy of Silver Nanoparticles Incorporated in an Orthodontic Adhesive: An Animal Study.

Authors:  Abbas Bahador; Baharnaz Ayatollahi; Azam Akhavan; Maryam Pourhajibagher; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard; Ahmad Sodagar
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2020-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.