| Literature DB >> 25477917 |
Birgul Kacmaz1, Ozlem Unaldi2, Nedim Sultan3, Riza Durmaz4.
Abstract
The aims of this study were to investigate drug resistance rates, types of extended spectrum beta lactamases (ESBLs), and molecular epidemiological characteristics of 43 Shigella sonnei isolates. Ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, chloramphenicol, and ciprofloxacin were the most active antibiotics. Five isolates harbored bla SHV-12, bla(TEM-1) and bla(CTX-M-15). More than 90% of the isolates had an indistinguishable pulsotype.Entities:
Keywords: Shigella sonnei; extended spectrum beta-lactamase; plasmid profile; pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25477917 PMCID: PMC4204968 DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000300013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Distribution of S. sonnei strains according to epidemiologic, phenotypic and molecular typing characteristics.
| Strain No | Isolation date(m/d/y) | Antibiotic susceptibility pattern | Phase type | PFGE type | Plasmid profile | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
| AMC | CRO | CTX | AMP | SXT | CFM | Antibiotypes | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | ||||
| 1 | 08.27.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | − | + | A | I |
| 2 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | + | A | I | |
| 3 | 09.30.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | I |
| 4 | 09.08.2004 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | + | A | I |
| 5 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | I | |
| 6 | 10.13.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | II |
| 7 | 09.11.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | I |
| 8 | 09.26.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | I |
| 9 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | + | A | VI | |
| 10 | S | R | R | R | R | R | 3 | − | + | A | I | |
| 11 | 10.03.2005 | S | R | R | R | R | R | 3 | + | + | A | I |
| 12 | 10.17.2004 | R | R | R | R | R | R | 4 | + | − | A | I |
| 13 | 08.29.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | II |
| 14 | 09.26.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | + | A | VII |
| 15 | 05.29.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | I |
| 16 | 08.27.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | I |
| 17 | 09.30.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | I |
| 18 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | I | |
| 19 | 08.26.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | II |
| 20 | 09.28.2006 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | + | A | I |
| 21 | 09.29.2006 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | V |
| 22 | 09.26.2006 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 1 | + | − | A | I |
| 23 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | A | IX | |
| 24 | S | R | R | R | R | R | 3 | + | − | A1 | II | |
| 25 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | B | III | |
| 26 | 01.10.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | B | I |
| 27 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | B | III | |
| 28 | 10.16.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | − | + | C | IV |
| 29 | 09.28.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | − | + | C | V |
| 30 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | − | + | C | I | |
| 31 | 08.26.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | C | I |
| 32 | 09.24.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | + | C1 | I |
| 33 | 09.30.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | D | I |
| 34 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | D | I | |
| 35 | 09.12.2005 | S | R | R | R | R | R | 3 | + | − | D | I |
| 36 | 09.20.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | − | + | D1 | I |
| 37 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | E | III | |
| 38 | 09.24.2006 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | E | III |
| 39 | 10.19.2005 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | − | + | E1 | IV |
| 40 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | F | II | |
| 41 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | F | III | |
| 42 | 09.18.2006 | S | S | S | S | R | S | 2 | + | − | F | I |
| 43 | S | S | S | S | S | S | 1 | − | + | F | VIII | |
ESBL-producing isolates: Isolate 10, 12 had blaCTX-M-15, isolate 11, 35 had both blaCTX-M-15 and blaTEM-1, isolate 24 had both blaTEM-1 and blaSHV-12
Figure 1Dendrogram of the PFGE patterns of the 43 S. sonnei isolates. A, B, C, D, E, and F were indistinguishable profiles including 23, 3, 4, 3, 2, and 4 isolates, respectively. A1, C1, D1, and E1 were closely related PFGE profiles having 1 to 2 band-differences from the related clones.