Literature DB >> 25477800

Uncertainty in perception and the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter.

Christoph D Mathys1, Ekaterina I Lomakina2, Jean Daunizeau3, Sandra Iglesias4, Kay H Brodersen4, Karl J Friston5, Klaas E Stephan6.   

Abstract

In its full sense, perception rests on an agent's model of how its sensory input comes about and the inferences it draws based on this model. These inferences are necessarily uncertain. Here, we illustrate how the Hierarchical Gaussian Filter (HGF) offers a principled and generic way to deal with the several forms that uncertainty in perception takes. The HGF is a recent derivation of one-step update equations from Bayesian principles that rests on a hierarchical generative model of the environment and its (in)stability. It is computationally highly efficient, allows for online estimates of hidden states, and has found numerous applications to experimental data from human subjects. In this paper, we generalize previous descriptions of the HGF and its account of perceptual uncertainty. First, we explicitly formulate the extension of the HGF's hierarchy to any number of levels; second, we discuss how various forms of uncertainty are accommodated by the minimization of variational free energy as encoded in the update equations; third, we combine the HGF with decision models and demonstrate the inversion of this combination; finally, we report a simulation study that compared four optimization methods for inverting the HGF/decision model combination at different noise levels. These four methods (Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm, Gaussian process-based global optimization, variational Bayes and Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling) all performed well even under considerable noise, with variational Bayes offering the best combination of efficiency and informativeness of inference. Our results demonstrate that the HGF provides a principled, flexible, and efficient-but at the same time intuitive-framework for the resolution of perceptual uncertainty in behaving agents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; decision-making; filtering; free energy; hierarchical modeling; learning; uncertainty; volatility

Year:  2014        PMID: 25477800      PMCID: PMC4237059          DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci        ISSN: 1662-5161            Impact factor:   3.169


  30 in total

1.  Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation.

Authors:  Karl Friston; Jérémie Mattout; Nelson Trujillo-Barreto; John Ashburner; Will Penny
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Model-based fMRI and its application to reward learning and decision making.

Authors:  John P O'Doherty; Alan Hampton; Hackjin Kim
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Hierarchical prediction errors in midbrain and basal forebrain during sensory learning.

Authors:  Sandra Iglesias; Christoph Mathys; Kay H Brodersen; Lars Kasper; Marco Piccirelli; Hanneke E M den Ouden; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  An approximately Bayesian delta-rule model explains the dynamics of belief updating in a changing environment.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Robert C Wilson; Benjamin Heasly; Joshua I Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Christoph Mathys; Jean Daunizeau; Markus Bauer; Jon Driver; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Noise in the nervous system.

Authors:  A Aldo Faisal; Luc P J Selen; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Observing the observer (II): deciding when to decide.

Authors:  Jean Daunizeau; Hanneke E M den Ouden; Matthias Pessiglione; Stefan J Kiebel; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Associative learning of social value.

Authors:  Timothy E J Behrens; Laurence T Hunt; Mark W Woolrich; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The computational anatomy of psychosis.

Authors:  Rick A Adams; Klaas Enno Stephan; Harriet R Brown; Christopher D Frith; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Exploration, novelty, surprise, and free energy minimization.

Authors:  Philipp Schwartenbeck; Thomas Fitzgerald; Raymond J Dolan; Karl Friston
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-07
View more
  84 in total

1.  Using reinforcement learning models in social neuroscience: frameworks, pitfalls and suggestions of best practices.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Lukas Lengersdorff; Nace Mikus; Jan Gläscher; Claus Lamm
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  A Roadmap for the Development of Applied Computational Psychiatry.

Authors:  Martin P Paulus; Quentin J M Huys; Tiago V Maia
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-09

3.  Conditioned hallucinations: historic insights and future directions.

Authors:  Philip R Corlett; Albert R Powers
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Alterations in the amplitude and burst rate of beta oscillations impair reward-dependent motor learning in anxiety.

Authors:  Sebastian Sporn; Thomas Hein; Maria Herrojo Ruiz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Separate neural representations of prediction error valence and surprise: Evidence from an fMRI meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elsa Fouragnan; Chris Retzler; Marios G Philiastides
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Neural surprise in somatosensory Bayesian learning.

Authors:  Sam Gijsen; Miro Grundei; Robert T Lange; Dirk Ostwald; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Paranoia as a deficit in non-social belief updating.

Authors:  Erin J Reed; Stefan Uddenberg; Praveen Suthaharan; Christoph D Mathys; Jane R Taylor; Stephanie Mary Groman; Philip R Corlett
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Ketamine Affects Prediction Errors about Statistical Regularities: A Computational Single-Trial Analysis of the Mismatch Negativity.

Authors:  Lilian A Weber; Andreea O Diaconescu; Christoph Mathys; André Schmidt; Michael Kometer; Franz Vollenweider; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Computational Dysfunctions in Anxiety: Failure to Differentiate Signal From Noise.

Authors:  He Huang; Wesley Thompson; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  The effect of single-dose methylphenidate on the rate of error-driven learning in healthy males: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jonathon R Howlett; He Huang; Cédric M Hysek; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.