| Literature DB >> 25476608 |
Anna Kyunglim Park1, Ryan P Liegel2, Adam Ronchetti3, Allison D Ebert4, Aron Geurts5,6, Duska J Sidjanin7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Loss-of-function mutations in TBC1D20 cause Warburg Micro syndrome 4 (WARBM4), which is an autosomal recessive syndromic disorder characterized by eye, brain, and genital abnormalities. Blind sterile (bs) mice carry a Tbc1d20-null mutation and exhibit cataracts and testicular phenotypes similar to those observed in WARBM4 patients. In addition to TBC1D20, mutations in RAB3GAP1, RAB3GAP2 and RAB18 cause WARBM1-3 respectively. However, regardless of which gene harbors the causative mutation, all individuals affected with WARBM exhibit indistinguishable clinical presentations. In contrast, bs, Rab3gap1 (-/-) , and Rab18 (-/-) mice exhibit distinct phenotypes; this phenotypic variability of WARBM mice was previously attributed to potential compensatory mechanisms. Rab3gap1 (-/-) and Rab18 (-/-) mice were genetically engineered using standard approaches, whereas the Tbc1d20 mutation in the bs mice arose spontaneously. There is the possibility that another unidentified mutation within the bs linkage disequilibrium may be contributing to the bs phenotypes and thus contributing to the phenotypic variability in WARBM mice. The goal of this study was to establish the phenotypic consequences in mice caused by the disruption of the Tbc1d20 gene.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25476608 PMCID: PMC4266191 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-014-0135-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Figure 1The evaluation of the allele. ZFN-mediated genomic editing resulted in the Tbc1d20 transcript characterized by a 9 bp c.[418_426del] deletion (A). The Tbc1d20 allele encodes the TBC1D20-ZFN mutant protein with an in-frame 3 amino acid p.[H140_Y143del] deletion within a highly evolutionarily conserved TBC domain. Missing amino acids are depicted in red (B). (C) Overexpression of FLAG-tagged TBC1D20-WT (green) led to a disruption of the Golgi as evident by the punctate GM130 immunostaining (red). (D) Overexpression of the FLAG-tagged TBC1D20-ZFN protein (green) did not disrupt GM130 immunostaining of the Golgi and did not differ from GM130 immunostaining of the untransfected HeLa cell (E). DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars = 5 μm.
Figure 2The eye phenotypes in mice. H&E analysis revealed severely disrupted P28Tbc1d20 eyes (B) eyes when compared to controls (A); scale bars = 250 μm. Tbc1d20 vacuolated lenses exhibiting severely shortened and disorganized lens fiber cells (D) in contrast to highly organized lens fibers in control lenses (C); scale bars = 50 μm. The Tbc1d20 mice exhibited thickened pupillary sphincter muscle (F) when compared to the pupillary sphincter muscled noted in control eyes (E); scale bars = 50 μm.
Figure 3The testicular phenotypes in mice. Tbc1d20 testes appeared smaller in size when compared to controls (A); scale bar = 1 mm. H&E analysis identified disorganized Tbc1d20 seminiferous tubules (C) when compared to highly organized seminiferous tubules in controls (B); scale bars = 50 μm. TRA54 immunostaining (green) in control tubules revealed small punctae and crescent-shaped staining consistent with spermatocytes and round spermatids respectively (D) and in Tbc1d20 only TRA54 positive punctate staining was evident (E). PNA staining of control tubules identified the presence of acrosomes (F), whereas in Tbc1d20 only PNA positive punctate staining was noted (G); scale bars = 25 μm. DNA was stained with DAPI (blue).
Figure 4mEF cellular phenotypes. Oleic acid treatment for 24 hr following staining with the neutral lipid dye BODIPY 493/503 revealed expanded LD structures in Tbc1d20 MEFs (B) when compared to control MEFs (A). Quantification analyses shown in (C) identified that % of LD area per cell in Tbc1d20 (13.89 ± 1.23) was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than in control (4.16 ± 0.25) MEFs. P values were determined by Student’s t test and error bars represent SEM. GM130 immunostaining (red) revealed no Golgi differences between Tbc1d20 (E) and control MEFs (D). DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars = 5 μm.
Figure 5Eye and testicular phenotypes in compound heterozygote mice. H&E analysis revealed cataracts in Tbc1d20 lenses characterized by the presence of vacuoles (B) when compared to highly organized control lenses (A); scale bars = 50 μm. Tbc1d20 testes appeared smaller in size when compared to controls (C); scale bar = 1 mm. H&E analysis identified disorganized Tbc1d20 seminiferous tubules (E) when compared to highly organized seminiferous tubules in controls (D); scale bars = 50 μm. Immunostaining with TRA54 (green) in control tubules revealed small punctae and crescent-shaped staining consistent with spermatocytes and round spermatids respectively (F) and in Tbc1d20 only TRA54 positive punctate staining was evident (G). PNA positive acrosomes were evident in control tubules (H), whereas in Tbc1d20 only PNA positive punctate staining was noted (I); scale bars = 25 μm. DNA was stained with DAPI (blue).