Literature DB >> 25476466

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults: there is (still) a long way to go. The results of the Bologna-Maggiore Hospital trauma center experience and development of a clinical algorithm.

Gregorio Tugnoli1, Elisa Bianchi1, Andrea Biscardi1, Carlo Coniglio2, Salvatore Isceri3, Luigi Simonetti3, Giovanni Gordini2, Salomone Di Saverio4.   

Abstract

Non-operative management (NOM) of hemodynamically stable patients with blunt splenic injury (BSI) is the standard of care, although it is associated with a potential risk of failure. Hemodynamically unstable patients should always undergo immediate surgery and avoid unnecessary CT scans. Angioembolization might help to increase the NOM rates, as well as NOM success rates. The aim of this study was to review and critically analyze the data from BSI cases managed at the Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center during the past 5 years, with a focus on NOM, its success rates and outcomes. A further aim was to develop a proposed clinical practical algorithm for the management of BSI derived from Clinical Audit experience. During the period between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013 we managed 293 patients with splenic lesions at the Trauma Center of Maggiore Hospital of Bologna. The data analyzed included the demographics, clinical parameters and characteristics, diagnostic and therapeutic data, as well as the outcomes and follow-up data. A retrospective evaluation of the clinical outcomes through a clinical audit has been used to design a practical clinical algorithm. During the five-year period, 293 patients with BSI were admitted, 77 of whom underwent immediate surgical management. The majority (216) of the patients was initially managed non-operatively and 207 of these patients experienced a successful NOM, with an overall rate of successful NOM of 70 % among all BSI cases. The success rate of NOM was 95.8 % in this series. All patients presenting with stable hemodynamics underwent an immediate CT-scan; angiography with embolization was performed in 54 cases for active contrast extravasation or in cases with grade V lesions even in absence of active bleeding. Proximal embolization was preferentially used for high-grade injuries. After a critical review of the cases treated during the past 5 years during a monthly clinical audit meeting, a clinical algorithm has been developed with the aim of standardizing the clinical management of BSI by a multidisciplinary team to include every patient within the correct diagnostic and therapeutic pathway, in order to improve the outcomes by potentially decreasing the NOM failure rates and to optimize the utilization of resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angioembolization; Non-operative management; Splenic trauma; Trauma algorithm; Trauma center; Trauma surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25476466     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-1084-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  19 in total

1.  A survey of EAST member practices in blunt splenic injury: a description of current trends and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  Paola Fata; Linda Robinson; Samir M Fakhry
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-10

2.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-20

Review 3.  Is non-operative management safe and effective for all splenic blunt trauma? A systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Carlo Boselli; Alessia Corsi; Eriberto Farinella; Chiara Listorti; Stefano Trastulli; Claudio Renzi; Jacopo Desiderio; Alberto Santoro; Lucio Cagini; Amilcare Parisi; Adriano Redler; Giuseppe Noya; Abe Fingerhut
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Hospital factors associated with splenectomy for splenic injury: a national perspective.

Authors:  S Rob Todd; Melanie Arthur; Craig Newgard; Jerris R Hedges; Richard J Mullins
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2004-11

5.  Failure of observation of blunt splenic injury in adults: variability in practice and adverse consequences.

Authors:  Andrew B Peitzman; Brian G Harbrecht; Luis Rivera; Brian Heil
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  The utility of serial computed tomography imaging of blunt splenic injury: still worth a second look?

Authors:  Jordan A Weinberg; Louis J Magnotti; Martin A Croce; Norma M Edwards; Timothy C Fabian
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-05

7.  Trauma center variation in splenic artery embolization and spleen salvage: a multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Aman Banerjee; Therese M Duane; Sean P Wilson; Starre Haney; Patrick J O'Neill; Heather L Evans; John J Como; Jeffrey A Claridge
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.313

8.  Angiography for blunt splenic trauma does not improve the success rate of nonoperative management.

Authors:  Brian G Harbrecht; Sae Hee Ko; Gregory A Watson; Raquel M Forsythe; Matthew R Rosengart; Andrew B Peitzman
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-07

9.  Selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline.

Authors:  Nicole A Stassen; Indermeet Bhullar; Julius D Cheng; Marie L Crandall; Randall S Friese; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Randeep S Jawa; Adrian A Maung; Thomas J Rohs; Ayodele Sangosanya; Kevin M Schuster; Mark J Seamon; Kathryn M Tchorz; Ben L Zarzuar; Andrew J Kerwin
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.313

10.  Low attenuation of acute traumatic hemoperitoneum on CT scans.

Authors:  C D Levine; U J Patel; P M Silverman; R H Wachsberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  11 in total

1.  Management of blunt splenic injury in a UK major trauma centre and predicting the failure of non-operative management: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Stella R Smith; Louise Morris; Stephen Spreadborough; Waleed Al-Obaydi; Marta D'Auria; Hilary White; Adam J Brooks
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Splenic trauma in the twenty-first century: changing trends in management.

Authors:  P Roy; R Mukherjee; M Parik
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Emergency CT for assessment and management of blunt traumatic splenic injuries at a Level 1 Trauma Center: 13-year study.

Authors:  Sergio Margari; Fernanda Garozzo Velloni; Massimo Tonolini; Ettore Colombo; Diana Artioli; Niccolò Ettore Allievi; Fabrizio Sammartano; Osvaldo Chiara; Angelo Vanzulli
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-05-12

4.  Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Feasibility and Outcomes.

Authors:  Navpreet K Dhillon; Galinos Barmparas; Gretchen M Thomsen; Kavita A Patel; Nikhil T Linaval; Emma Gillette; Daniel R Margulies; Eric J Ley
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Value of repeat CT for nonoperative management of patients with blunt liver and spleen injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Khadidja Malloum Boukar; Lynne Moore; Pier-Alexandre Tardif; Kahina Soltana; Natalie Yanchar; John Kortbeek; Howard Champion; Julien Clement
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 6.  Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Giulia Montori; Fausto Catena; Yoram Kluger; Walter Biffl; Ernest E Moore; Viktor Reva; Camilla Bing; Miklosh Bala; Paola Fugazzola; Hany Bahouth; Ingo Marzi; George Velmahos; Rao Ivatury; Kjetil Soreide; Tal Horer; Richard Ten Broek; Bruno M Pereira; Gustavo P Fraga; Kenji Inaba; Joseph Kashuk; Neil Parry; Peter T Masiakos; Konstantinos S Mylonas; Andrew Kirkpatrick; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Simone Vasilij Benatti; Noel Naidoo; Francesco Salvetti; Stefano Maccatrozzo; Vanni Agnoletti; Emiliano Gamberini; Leonardo Solaini; Antonio Costanzo; Andrea Celotti; Matteo Tomasoni; Vladimir Khokha; Catherine Arvieux; Lena Napolitano; Lauri Handolin; Michele Pisano; Stefano Magnone; David A Spain; Marc de Moya; Kimberly A Davis; Nicola De Angelis; Ari Leppaniemi; Paula Ferrada; Rifat Latifi; David Costa Navarro; Yashuiro Otomo; Raul Coimbra; Ronald V Maier; Frederick Moore; Sandro Rizoli; Boris Sakakushev; Joseph M Galante; Osvaldo Chiara; Stefania Cimbanassi; Alain Chichom Mefire; Dieter Weber; Marco Ceresoli; Andrew B Peitzman; Liban Wehlie; Massimo Sartelli; Salomone Di Saverio; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Definition of hemodynamic stability in blunt trauma patients: a systematic review and assessment amongst Dutch trauma team members.

Authors:  S A I Loggers; T W A Koedam; G F Giannakopoulos; E Vandewalle; M Erwteman; W P Zuidema
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Clinical and Radiological Presentations and Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma: A Single Tertiary Hospital Experience.

Authors:  Gaby Jabbour; Ammar Al-Hassani; Ayman El-Menyar; Husham Abdelrahman; Ruben Peralta; Mohammed Ellabib; Hisham Al-Jogol; Mohammed Asim; Hassan Al-Thani
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-07-12

9.  Can we predict delayed undesirable events after blunt injury to the torso visceral organs?

Authors:  Kenichiro Uchida; Yasumitsu Mizobata; Naohiro Hagawa; Tomonori Yamamoto; Shinichiro Kaga; Tomohiro Noda; Naoki Shinyama; Tetsuro Nishimura; Hiromasa Yamamoto
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2018-01-30

Review 10.  Splenic artery embolization: technically feasible but not necessarily advantageous.

Authors:  F Van der Cruyssen; A Manzelli
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.