Literature DB >> 16038813

Failure of observation of blunt splenic injury in adults: variability in practice and adverse consequences.

Andrew B Peitzman1, Brian G Harbrecht, Luis Rivera, Brian Heil.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multiinstitutional Workgroup reported a failure rate for nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults of 10.8%. Sixty percent of the failures occurred within 24 hours of admission. The purpose of this multiinstitutional study by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma was to determine common variables in failure of nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults. STUDY
DESIGN: Medical records were reviewed in a blinded fashion on 78 patients in whom nonoperative management failed. Statistical analysis was performed with ANOVA, extended chi-square, and Fisher's exact test; statistical significance was p<0.05.
RESULTS: The 78 patients were categorized based on hemodynamic status. Forty-four percent were stable; 31% had transient hypotension or tachycardia that resolved with fluid infusion (responders); and 25% were unstable. Two-thirds of the unstable patients required laparotomy within 12 hours of admission; all had laparotomy within 72 hours. Mortality was significantly different when comparing the unstable to the stable and responder groups: stable (3%), responders (8%), and unstable (37%), despite similar age and only modest differences in Injury Severity Score. Eight CT scans were misinterpreted initially. Of 26 Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma (FAST) studies, 11 (42.3%) were false negative. Abnormal abdominal findings were noted in 67.7% of patients on admission. Ten patients died (12.8%). Sixty percent of the deaths were caused largely by delayed treatment of splenic or other abdominal injuries; one patient died in the responder group and five unstable patients died.
CONCLUSIONS: Thirty percent to 40% of the patients who had unsuccessful nonoperative management in this study were selected inappropriately, with hemodynamic instability or initial misinterpretation of diagnostic studies. As a consequence, the majority of the deaths were from delayed treatment of intraabdominal injuries. This article suggests that written protocols, better adherence to sound clinical judgment, and experienced and timely interpretation of radiologic studies would reduce the incidence of failure of nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16038813     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  33 in total

1.  Endovascular therapy in trauma.

Authors:  M Brenner; M Hoehn; T E Rasmussen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Management of blunt splenic injury in a UK major trauma centre and predicting the failure of non-operative management: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Stella R Smith; Louise Morris; Stephen Spreadborough; Waleed Al-Obaydi; Marta D'Auria; Hilary White; Adam J Brooks
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 3.  Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: what is new?

Authors:  G A Watson; M K Hoffman; A B Peitzman
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Predicting the Outcome of Non-operative Management of Splenic Trauma in South Africa.

Authors:  Matthew C Hernandez; Michael D Traynor; Ariel W Knight; Victor Y Kong; Grant L Laing; John L Bruce; Wanda Bekker; Martin D Zielinski; Damian L Clarke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoscopic splenectomy for severe blunt trauma: initial experience of ten consecutive cases with a fast hemostatic technique.

Authors:  Andrea Carobbi; Francesco Romagnani; Giacomo Antonelli; Manlio Bianchini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Blunt splenic injury and severe brain injury: a decision analysis and implications for care.

Authors:  Thamer Alabbasi; Avery B Nathens; Homer Tien
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Splenic mass with remote trauma history: a management dilemma.

Authors:  C J McCarthy; G C O'Brien; J Kennedy; P J Broe
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 8.  Damage control - trauma care in the first hour and beyond: a clinical review of relevant developments in the field of trauma care.

Authors:  A E Sharrock; M Midwinter
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Emergency CT for assessment and management of blunt traumatic splenic injuries at a Level 1 Trauma Center: 13-year study.

Authors:  Sergio Margari; Fernanda Garozzo Velloni; Massimo Tonolini; Ettore Colombo; Diana Artioli; Niccolò Ettore Allievi; Fabrizio Sammartano; Osvaldo Chiara; Angelo Vanzulli
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-05-12

10.  Splenic embolization in trauma: results of a survey from an international cohort.

Authors:  Alessandro Gasparetto; David Hunter; Marc Sapoval; Sandeep Sharma; Jafar Golzarian
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.