Literature DB >> 25476258

Added prognostic value of ischaemic threshold in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging: a common-sense integration of exercise tolerance and ischaemia severity.

Cecilia Marini1, Wanda Acampa, Matteo Bauckneht, Stefania Daniele, Selene Capitanio, Valeria Cantoni, Francesco Fiz, Emilia Zampella, Bassam Dib, Roberta Assante, Paolo Bruzzi, Gianmario Sambuceti, Alberto Cuocolo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reversible ischaemia at radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) accurately predicts risk of cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction (major adverse cardiac events, MACE). This prognostic penetrance might be empowered by accounting for exercise tolerance as an indirect index of ischaemia severity. The present study aimed to verify this hypothesis integrating imaging assessment of ischaemia severity with exercise maximal rate pressure product (RPP) in a large cohort of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND
RESULTS: We analysed 1,502 consecutive patients (1,014 men aged 59 ± 10 years) submitted to exercise stress/rest MPI. To account for exercise tolerance, the summed difference score (SDS) was divided by RPP at tracer injection providing a clinical prognostic index (CPI). Reversible ischaemia was documented in 357 patients (24 %) and was classified by SDS as mild (SDS 2-4) in 180, moderate (SDS 5-7) in 118 and severe (SDS >7) in 59. CPI values of ischaemic patients were clustered into tertiles with lowest and highest values indicating low and high risk, respectively. CPI modified SDS risk prediction in 119/357 (33 %) patients. During a 60-month follow-up, MACE occurred in 68 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that CPI significantly improved predictive power for MACE incidence with respect to SDS alone. Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed the additive independent value of CPI-derived information.
CONCLUSION: Integration of ischaemic threshold and ischaemia extension and severity can improve accuracy of exercise MPI in predicting long-term outcome in a large cohort of patients with suspected or known CAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25476258     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-014-2963-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  26 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Comparison of coronary vasodilation with intravenous dipyridamole and adenosine.

Authors:  J D Rossen; J E Quillen; A G Lopez; R G Stenberg; C L Talman; M D Winniford
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.

Authors:  P W Wilson; R B D'Agostino; D Levy; A M Belanger; H Silbershatz; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction.

Authors:  T Sharir; G Germano; X Kang; H C Lewin; R Miranda; I Cohen; R D Agafitei; J D Friedman; D S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Optimization of flow reserve measurement using SPECT technology to evaluate the determinants of coronary microvascular dysfunction in diabetes.

Authors:  Cecilia Marini; GianPaolo Bezante; Patrizia Gandolfo; Elisa Modonesi; Silvia D Morbelli; Angelo Depascale; Daniela Rollando; Davide Maggi; Manuela Albertelli; Riccardo Armonino; Manrico Balbi; Claudio Brunelli; Renzo Cordera; Gianmario Sambuceti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Regulation of coronary blood flow during exercise.

Authors:  Dirk J Duncker; Robert J Bache
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Comparative prognostic value of automatic quantitative analysis versus semiquantitative visual analysis of exercise myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  D S Berman; X Kang; K F Van Train; H C Lewin; I Cohen; J Areeda; J D Friedman; G Germano; L J Shaw; R Hachamovitch
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  D B Mark; L Shaw; F E Harrell; M A Hlatky; K L Lee; J R Bengtson; C B McCants; R M Califf; D B Pryor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Stress cardiac MR imaging compared with stress echocardiography in the early evaluation of patients who present to the emergency department with intermediate-risk chest pain.

Authors:  John F Heitner; Igor Klem; Derek Rasheed; Abhinav Chandra; Han W Kim; Lowie M R Van Assche; Michele Parker; Robert M Judd; James G Jollis; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Stress-induced alteration of left ventricular eccentricity: An additional marker of multivessel CAD.

Authors:  Alessia Gimelli; Riccardo Liga; Assuero Giorgetti; Mirta Casagranda; Paolo Marzullo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Appropriate use criteria in clinical routine practice: implications in a nuclear cardiology lab.

Authors:  Alessia Gimelli; Ilaria Rovai; Riccardo Liga; Emilio Maria Pasanisi; Paolo Marzullo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  One year of nuclear cardiology in Europe.

Authors:  Olivier Lairez; Denis Agostini
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.668

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.