OBJECTIVE: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive high-resolution imaging technique that permits characterization of microarchitectural features in real time. Previous ex vivo studies have shown that the technique is capable of distinguishing between parathyroid tissue, thyroid tissue, lymph nodes, and adipose tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the practicality of OCT during open and minimally invasive parathyroid and thyroid surgery. METHODS: During parathyroid and thyroid surgery, OCT images were generated from parathyroid glands, thyroid tissue, lymph nodes, and adipose tissue. The images were immediately assessed by the operating team using the previously defined criteria. Second, the OCT images were blinded with respect to their origin and analyzed by two investigators. Whenever possible the OCT findings were matched to the corresponding histology. RESULTS: A total of 227 OCT images from 27 patients undergoing open or minimally invasive thyroid or parathyroid surgery were analyzed. Parathyroid glands were correctly identified in 69.2%, thyroid tissue in 74.5%, lymph nodes in 37.5%, and adipose tissue in 69.2%. 43 OCT images (18.9%) could not be allocated to one of the tissue types (Table 2). Sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing parathyroid tissue from the other entities were 69% (63 true positive, 13 false negative findings, 15 images where an allocation was not possible) and 66%, respectively (71 true negative, 9 false positive, 28 images where an assessment was not possible). CONCLUSION: OCT is capable of distinguishing between parathyroid, thyroid, and adipose tissue. An accurate differentiation between parathyroid tissue and lymph nodes was not possible. The disappointing results compared to the previous ex vivo study are related to problems handling the endoscopic probe intraoperatively. However, further refinement of this new technology may lead to OCT systems with higher resolution and intraoperative probes that are easier to handle.
OBJECTIVE: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive high-resolution imaging technique that permits characterization of microarchitectural features in real time. Previous ex vivo studies have shown that the technique is capable of distinguishing between parathyroid tissue, thyroid tissue, lymph nodes, and adipose tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the practicality of OCT during open and minimally invasive parathyroid and thyroid surgery. METHODS: During parathyroid and thyroid surgery, OCT images were generated from parathyroid glands, thyroid tissue, lymph nodes, and adipose tissue. The images were immediately assessed by the operating team using the previously defined criteria. Second, the OCT images were blinded with respect to their origin and analyzed by two investigators. Whenever possible the OCT findings were matched to the corresponding histology. RESULTS: A total of 227 OCT images from 27 patients undergoing open or minimally invasive thyroid or parathyroid surgery were analyzed. Parathyroid glands were correctly identified in 69.2%, thyroid tissue in 74.5%, lymph nodes in 37.5%, and adipose tissue in 69.2%. 43 OCT images (18.9%) could not be allocated to one of the tissue types (Table 2). Sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing parathyroid tissue from the other entities were 69% (63 true positive, 13 false negative findings, 15 images where an allocation was not possible) and 66%, respectively (71 true negative, 9 false positive, 28 images where an assessment was not possible). CONCLUSION: OCT is capable of distinguishing between parathyroid, thyroid, and adipose tissue. An accurate differentiation between parathyroid tissue and lymph nodes was not possible. The disappointing results compared to the previous ex vivo study are related to problems handling the endoscopic probe intraoperatively. However, further refinement of this new technology may lead to OCT systems with higher resolution and intraoperative probes that are easier to handle.
Authors: Roland Ladurner; Klaus K J Hallfeldt; Norah Al Arabi; Herbert Stepp; Susanna Mueller; Julia K S Gallwas Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Luiz C Conti de Freitas; Eimear Phelan; Linbo Liu; Joseph Gardecki; Eman Namati; Willian C Warger; Guillermo J Tearney; Gregory W Randolph Journal: Head Neck Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Julia K S Gallwas; Lisa Turk; Herbert Stepp; Susanna Mueller; Robert Ochsenkuehn; Klaus Friese; Christian Dannecker Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Sarah J Erickson-Bhatt; Kelly J Mesa; Marina Marjanovic; Eric J Chaney; Adeel Ahmad; Pin-Chieh Huang; Z George Liu; Kelly Cunningham; Stephen A Boppart Journal: Transl Res Date: 2017-12-08 Impact factor: 7.012
Authors: Giju Thomas; Melanie A McWade; Constantine Paras; Emmanuel A Mannoh; Melinda E Sanders; Lisa M White; James T Broome; John E Phay; Naira Baregamian; Carmen C Solórzano; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen Journal: Thyroid Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Marc Rubinstein; Allison C Hu; Phil-Sang Chung; Jason H Kim; Kathryn E Osann; Paul Schalch; William B Armstrong; Brian J F Wong Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Alexander Micko; Fabian Placzek; Roger Fonollà; Michael Winklehner; Ryan Sentosa; Arno Krause; Greisa Vila; Romana Höftberger; Marco Andreana; Wolfgang Drexler; Rainer A Leitgeb; Angelika Unterhuber; Stefan Wolfsberger Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Max Lerchenberger; Norah Al Arabi; Julia K S Gallwas; Herbert Stepp; Klaus K J Hallfeldt; Roland Ladurner Journal: Int J Endocrinol Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 3.257