Literature DB >> 25475081

Comparing the cariogenic species Streptococcus sobrinus and S. mutans on whole genome level.

Georg Conrads1, Johannes J de Soet2, Lifu Song3, Karsten Henne4, Helena Sztajer5, Irene Wagner-Döbler5, An-Ping Zeng3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two closely related species of mutans streptococci, namely Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus, are associated with dental caries in humans. Their acidogenic and aciduric capacity is directly associated with the cariogenic potential of these bacteria. To survive acidic and temporarily harsh conditions in the human oral cavity with hundreds of other microbial co-colonizers as competitors, both species have developed numerous mechanisms for adaptation.
OBJECTIVES: The recently published novel genome information for both species is used to elucidate genetic similarities but especially differences and to discuss the impact on cariogenicity of the corresponding phenotypic properties including adhesion, carbohydrate uptake and fermentation, acid tolerance, signaling by two component systems, competence, and oxidative stress resistance.
CONCLUSIONS: S. sobrinus can down-regulate the SpaA-mediated adherence to the pellicle. It has a smaller number of two-component signaling systems and bacteriocin-related genes than S. mutans, but all or even more immunity proteins. It lacks the central competence genes comC, comS, and comR. There are more genes coding for glucosyltransferases and a novel energy production pathway formed by lactate oxidase, which is not found in S. mutans. Both species show considerable differences in the regulation of fructan catabolism. However, both S. mutans and S. sobrinus share most of these traits and should therefore be considered as equally virulent with regard to dental caries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mutans streptococci; adhesion; bacteriocins; cariogenicity; comparative genomics; competence; sugar metabolism; two-component-systems

Year:  2014        PMID: 25475081      PMCID: PMC4256546          DOI: 10.3402/jom.v6.26189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Microbiol        ISSN: 2000-2297            Impact factor:   5.474


Dental caries is a complex disease that results from interactions of acidogenic/aciduric bacteria colonizing the tooth surface and the oral environment. Although other species, especially lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, and less investigated aciduric species such as Atopobium sp. or Slackia exigua, are also involved, the mutans streptococci (MS) group, in humans represented by Streptococcus mutans (serotypes c, e, f and k) and Streptococcus sobrinus (serotypes d and g) are still considered major etiological agents of dental decay. Over time, their attributed role changed from more or less true pathogens [specific plaque hypothesis (1)] to up-regulators of a sugar-triggered vicious cariogenic circle under destabilization of the homeostasis [extended caries ecological hypothesis (2, 3)] and the discussion is not finished, as outlined by Rosier et al. recently (4). However, it is generally accepted that S. mutans can be more frequently isolated from carious lesions than S. sobrinus and is by far the most relevant cariogenic Streptococcus species, although we should not rule out the acidogenic properties of several non-MS (5–7). A number of epidemiological and in-vitro studies suggested that S. sobrinus – under circumstances yet to discover – may be even more cariogenic than S. mutans (8–11). In addition, clinical studies have suggested that pre-school and 15-year-old school children harboring both S. mutans and S. sobrinus had a higher incidence of dental caries than those with S. mutans alone (12, 13). The virulence of MS is directly related to properties that enable these organisms to colonize and thrive on the tooth surfaces during acidic conditions. These properties include the production and regulation of adhesion proteins, glucosyltransferases (GTFs), and extracellular polysaccharides such as glucans that allow the bacteria to firmly adhere to the tooth surface in a biofilm. However, both species follow different strategies for adherence: S. mutans mainly using pellicle directed and specific surface antigens, S. sobrinus mainly using glucans and, as a consequence, both are found on different surfaces (S. sobrinus more buccal, S. mutans more occlusal). Comparing the recently explored genetic inventory of both species, this review will discuss consequences of specific genotypes for cariogenic phenotypes for each species. We focus on genes responsible for adhesion, metabolism of sugars (obtained from salivary glycoproteins and from the host diet to generate lactic acid, leading to acidogenicity), acid tolerance (ability to tolerate abundant amounts of lactic acid, leading to aciduricity), signaling, competence, bacteriocins and related immunity proteins, and oxidative stress resistance. The genetic inventory of S. mutans strains UA159, NN2025, 5DC8, AC4446, KK21, KK23, ATCC25175, and NCTC11060 as well as S. sobrinus DSM 20742 and TCI-107 was compared using the OrthoMCL software. Additional strains and data were included found in the NCBI database (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and the Human Oral Microbiome Database (HOMD at http://www.homd.org), respectively. Please refer to references 31 and 41 for details of our methods.

Adhesion

In several clinical studies, the role of S. sobrinus in relationship to caries is suggested to be additive to that of S. mutans. The latter is strongly associated with caries, but in situations of more severe caries, it is frequently found together with S. sobrinus (14–17). The acquisition of these bacteria by the susceptible host is a crucial step. The ‘infection dose’(with respect of the ecological plaque hypothesis, we might call it ‘stress dose’) may play an important role, since more transmission, or higher bacterial counts from the source of transmission, will result in a higher chance for successful acquisition (18, 19). But when the bacterium cannot adhere in the oral cavity, the acquisition will never be successful. Therefore, adherence to epitopes in the oral cavity is a crucial step for streptococci to become resident. In S. mutans, cell surface antigen I/II (AgI/II), the glucan-binding region of the GTF enzymes and additional glucan-binding proteins (Gbp) have been implicated in its initial and specific adherence to saliva-coated (acquired enamel pellicle) tooth surfaces. These contact regions induce immune responses in mice effective in protection against colonization of S. mutans (20) and have been suggested as anti-caries vaccination agents. Cell wall proteins from the AgI/II family (synonyms SAI/II, PAc, P1, or SpaP; encoded by spaP; binding to salivary agglutinin glycoproteins, extracellular matrix molecules, and ligands of other oral bacteria) are not exclusively found in S. mutans but homologs have been reported in a variety of oral streptococci including S. intermedius, S. gordonii, S. pyogenes, and even non-oral S. agalactiae (21, 22). The S. sobrinus variant has been described as SpaA (or PAg), but with structural differences and less adhesive potential (23) possibly due to down regulation by Par, see Table 1. The AgI/II family is highly conserved throughout different streptococcal species and seems to be associated with the M-protein in other streptococci. It has been found that monoclonal antibodies against S. sobrinus SpaA are able to change the adhesion of this bacterium on hydroxyapatite disks in a triple species biofilm, suggesting a role of SpaA in the interspecies adherence in biofilms (24). In a review on streptococcal adherence factors, it has been reported that SpaA interacts with multiple host and microbial factors, from which binding to the salivary glycoprotein gp340 is most important (25). By our whole genome sequencing approach, we found another ‘adhesive protein’ encoding gene (D823_10858) in S. sobrinus DSM 20742. It seems to be the adherence component of an ATP binding cassette (ABC)-type Zn2 + and Mn2 + transporter system with homologs in many streptococci, including S. mutans, and related to the pneumococcal surface antigen PsaA (26).
Table 1

Comparing proteins and corresponding genes involved in adherence on pellicle coated tooth surfaces between S. mutans [eight strains according to (31)] and S. sobrinus DSM 20742 and TCI-107

S. mutans S. sobrinus

ClassNameFunctionEight strainsa DSM 20742, TCI-107
Surface adhesinsAgI/II, Spa, PASpecific adherence to acquired enamel pellicleSMU.610, spaP, pac D823_07515, spaA, pag
ParNegative regulator of surface antigenAbsent?D823_01230 or D823_08637, par
UnnamedSurface adhesin, part of ABC ion transporterSMU.1302D823_10858
GlucosyltransferasesGtf-IGlucosyltransferase-I (insoluble)SMU.1004, gtfB D823_05448, gtfI
Gtf-SIGlucosyltransferase-SISMU.1005, gtfC D823_05918, gtfSI
Gtf-SGlucosyltransferase-S (soluble)SMU.910, gtfD D823_03428, gtfS1
Gtf-SGlucosyltransferase-S (soluble)AbsentD823_01485, gtfS2
Gtf-TGlucosyltransferase-T (soluble)AbsentD823_07585 or D823_10815, gtfTb
Gtf-UGlucosyltransferase-U (soluble)AbsentD823_07585 or D823_10815, gtfUb
GtfGlucosyltransferaseAbsentD823_03433, gtf
Glucan-binding proteinsGbpAGlucan-binding protein ASMU.2112, gbpA D823_05458 and D823_05463
GbpBGlucan-binding protein BSMU.22, gbpB D823_01475
GbpCGlucan-binding protein CSMU.1396, gbpC D823_02626 and D823_02641
GbpDGlucan-binding protein D and lipaseSMU.772, gbpD D823 00935

All genes shown are conserved for at least seven out of eight strains and the UA159 gene variant is shown as representative.

The exact assignment between D823_07585, D823_10815 and gtfT, gtfU was not possible.

Comparing proteins and corresponding genes involved in adherence on pellicle coated tooth surfaces between S. mutans [eight strains according to (31)] and S. sobrinus DSM 20742 and TCI-107 All genes shown are conserved for at least seven out of eight strains and the UA159 gene variant is shown as representative. The exact assignment between D823_07585, D823_10815 and gtfT, gtfU was not possible. Summarizing the literature, it seems that initial attachment of S. sobrinus to the pellicle is minimal and in a less specific manner (25, 27) but, once attached, it can, in the presence of sucrose, accumulate by massive glucan formation (7, 28). Any GTFs (and especially those secreted from S. mutans) present in the pellicle, promote the initial attachment of S. sobrinus (28, 29), explaining why S. sobrinus is rarely found without S. mutans. Different GTFs of different classes are combined to synthesize glucans. The enzyme called GTF-S synthesizes a soluble α-(1-6)-branched dextran, the enzyme called GTF-I, synthesizes an insoluble α-(1-3) rich D-mutan (7, 30). A third class (GTF-SI) does exist producing a semi-soluble glucan with mixed α-(1-6)-α-(1-3) linkages. By phenotype, S. mutans appears to form primarily GTF-S, whereas S. sobrinus has both GTF-S and GTF-I activities [see (7) for review]. In animal models, S. sobrinus GTF activity at slow growth rates consisted mainly of GTF-S activity (30) but at higher growth rates, such as it might occur in plaque during exposure to dietary sucrose, the proportions of GTF-I increased, resulting in more insoluble dextran (30). If this finding is extrapolated to humans, then frequent sucrose pulses allow S. sobrinus to accumulate on smooth surfaces via mutan production and this contributes to the increase in smooth-surface decay we indeed see in S. sobrinus positive subjects. Comparing both species on a whole genome level (Table 1) reveals new details. S. sobrinus DSM 20742 has seven instead of three genes encoding for GTFs, one which is insoluble (GTF-I), one intermediate (GTF-SI), two ‘regular’ soluble (GTF-S1 and -S2), two which are α-(1-6)-branched glucan synthases [GTF-T or U respectively, see (32)], and one not further specifiable (‘GTF’). These multiple glucans apparently provide a potential by which S. sobrinus extends its niche from the retentive fissure site to the non-retentive smooth surfaces. It appears that GTF and glucans may play a minor role in fissure decay and perhaps no role at all where S. mutans is concerned. This also may explain why vaccines directed against the GTF of S. sobrinus (but not against the GTF of S. mutans) are mainly protective on smooth surfaces in animal models [reviewed by Loesche (7)]. S. mutans also synthesizes four Gbps: GbpA, GbpB, GbpC, and GbpD. The loss of any of the Gbps has an impact on adhesion and biofilm formation including dextran-dependent aggregation, dextranase inhibition, plaque cohesion, and perhaps cell wall synthesis (33). A whole genome comparison reveals that S. sobrinus has a similar repertoire in terms of Gbps (GbpA–D) but with two copies for GbpA and C encoding genes.

Uptake and metabolism of carbohydrates

Even more important than adherence is the successful growth of oral streptococci in their ecological niche. Where some years ago it was thought that pathogenic species were actively involved in acidogenicity of the ecosystem, nowadays we have more evidence that carbohydrate uptake and the resulting pH effects are, among other, the driving etiological factors, responsible for destabilization of oral biofilm homeostasis (3). MS get selected as they can compete with other species easily because of their capability to ferment many kinds of carbohydrates very efficiently. But interspecies competition is also found within MS. For instance, S. mutans out-competes S. sobrinus in the presence of the amino acid sugar N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) together with glucose. It is suggested that GlcNAc inhibited growth of S. sobrinus in media containing both glucose and GlcNAc, by competing with glucose for the glucose phosphotransferase, depleting intracellular levels of phosphoenolpyruvate, or possessing lower levels of N-acetyl-glucosamine-6-phosphate deacetylase and/or glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase activity (34). However, we found the deacetylase and deaminase genes in both species so that the difference might be due to transport systems [phosphotransferase system (PTS), see below] and/or promoter activity. For S. mutans, the accumulation of genes related to carbohydrate uptake and metabolism was an essential evolutionary advancement contributing to the survival in the oral cavity and to the success as a caries ‘pathogen’ or – more correct – trigger. The transport of various oligosaccharides, including melibiose, raffinose, stachyose, and maltodextrans, is primarily conducted by the activity of ABC transporters, which include the multiple sugar metabolism (msm) and malXFGK transport systems. The predominant route for uptake of mono- and disaccharides is the phosphoenolpyruvate-sugar PTS, for review see (35). So far, we did not find essential differences in the genetic configuration related to sugar uptake between S. mutans and S. sobrinus here, as homologs for, e.g. msmG (D823_01675 in S. sobrinus), msmK (D823_07028), malX (WP_019787850.1), ptsH (D823_05408), or ptsI (WP_019775468) were found; however, this needs further in-depth investigation. Due to their key roles in carbohydrates metabolism and energy production, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, TCA cycle and pyruvate metabolism pathways are generally considered to be highly conserved among oral bacteria. Interestingly, between other MS and S. sobrinus, differences in the central carbon metabolic pathways were found by our group (31) and shown in Fig. 1. Facultative anaerobes such as lactic acid bacteria including Streptococcus lack cytochrome oxidases of a respiratory chain and ATP required for survival and growth is generated by substrate level phosphorylation in the glycolysis pathway almost exclusively (36). Interestingly, two L-lactate oxidases (with similarity between 65 and 73% to lactate oxidases of lactobacilli) are found to be conserved in S. sobrinus (so far confirmed for strains AC153, DSM 20742, TCI-107) but are absent in all S. mutans strains. These two enzymes catalyze the reaction of L-Lactate+O2Pyruvate+H2O2 and/or D-Lactate+O2Pyruvate+H2O2. Indeed, three strains of S. sobrinus have been shown to produce hydrogen peroxide in vitro (37). It has been reported that in S. pneumoniae concerted action of lactate oxidase and pyruvate oxidase forms a novel energy-generation pathway by converting lactate acid to acetic acid under aerobic growth conditions (38). Because there is no pyruvate oxidase identified in S. sobrinus DSM 20742, the function of the lactate oxidases in S. sobrinus DSM 20742 should be different to that of S. pneumoniae. By a close examination we hypothesize that lactate oxidase, together with pyruvate dehydrogenase, phosphate acetyl transferase and acetate kinase, could form a novel energy production pathway to convert lactate acid to acetate and simultaneously produce one additional ATP, as depicted. By doing so, the lactate oxidases of S. sobrinus DSM 20742 could also play a role in consuming lactate to regulate pH, which would be an advantage for S. sobrinus in resistance to acid stress. In addition, this pathway could replenish Acetyl-CoA, an important intermediate for the biosynthesis of fatty acids and amino acids. Furthermore, lactate oxidase and lactate dehydrogenase could form a local NAD+ regeneration system, which would be certainly advantageous to S. sobrinus DSM 20742 under aerobic growth conditions. Favored by possessing the lactate oxidases, S. sobrinus has the potential ability of producing H2O2 to kill not only competitors (oxygen sensitive S. mutans, oral anaerobes) but also macrophages (39), and defend its ecological niche. In contrast to the unique harboring of lactate oxidases in S. sobrinus DSM 20742, citrate lyase (EC 4.1.3.6), which catalyzes the cleavage of citrate into oxaloacetate and acetate, and oxaloacetate decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.3), catalyzing the irreversible decarboxylation of oxaloacetate to pyruvate and CO2, are not found in S. sobrinus DSM 20742, as shown in Fig. 1 by the blue dotted lines. The absence of citrate lyase and oxaloacetate decarboxylase implies that S. sobrinus DSM 20742 might lack the ability in anaerobic utilization of citrate as a substrate. The disadvantages of S. sobrinus DSM 20742 in citrate utilization could be offset by the novel energy production pathway from lactate to acetate, as proposed above.
Fig. 1

Central metabolism pathways of mutans streptococci. The orange lines represent enzyme reactions conserved across the mutans streptococci strains compared in our recent study (31), whereas the blue lines represent enzyme reactions specifically present (solid line) or absent (dashed line) in S. sobrinus DSM 20742. Red crosses: the corresponding enzymes were not present in any strain investigated.

Central metabolism pathways of mutans streptococci. The orange lines represent enzyme reactions conserved across the mutans streptococci strains compared in our recent study (31), whereas the blue lines represent enzyme reactions specifically present (solid line) or absent (dashed line) in S. sobrinus DSM 20742. Red crosses: the corresponding enzymes were not present in any strain investigated.

Acid tolerance and two-component signal systems

Bacterial transduction two component systems (TCSs) play important roles by enabling cells to detect and respond to diverse changes/stresses in the environment with the pH to be one of the most important. A bacterial TCS comprises in general a trans-membrane sensor histidine kinase (HK) and a corresponding cytoplasmic response regulator (RR) encoded by genes located adjacently within the same operon, although stand-alone genes (‘orphans’) coding for HKs or RRs have also been reported (40). In a recent study, our group investigated differences in TCSs among MS including several S. mutans strains and S. sobrinus DSM 20742 (41). Totally, 18 TCS clusters comprising HK-RR pairs were identified. In Table 2, similarities and differences for both species in TCSs conserved for S. mutans are summarized. S. sobrinus DSM 20742 demonstrated deficits in the signal transduction systems related to acid tolerance and fructan catabolism (TCS-3, consisting of CovS/CovR). CovS/CovR is involved in the acid tolerance of S. mutans (42) and has also been reported to play a role in counteracting oxidative stress and reducing susceptibility to phagocytic killing (43). Therefore, the absence of TCS-3 can be interpreted as a selective disadvantage for S. sobrinus which might at least partially explain its lower prevalence and abundance in the oral cavity in general and in caries in particular.
Table 2

Comparing two component systems between S. mutans [eight strains according to (31)] and S. sobrinus DSM 20742

S. mutans S. sobrinus

TCS clusterTCS proteinFunction8 strainsa DSM 20742
TCS-1HK-VicK RR-VicRBiofilm development, competence development, oxidative stress tolerance, acid tolerance, autolysin production, glucan metabolism, fructan metabolismSMU.1516 SMU.1517D823_04656 D823_04651
TCS-2HK-CiaH RR-CiaRSucrose-dependent biofilm formation, competence development, multiple stress response, bacteriocin productionSMU.1128 SMU.1129D823_05868 D823_05873
TCS-3HK-CovS RR-CovRAcid tolerance, hydrogen peroxide resistance, murine macrophage killingSMU.1145c SMU.1146cAbsent Absent
TCS-4HK-KinF RR-LlrFAcid tolerance, pp(G)pp metabolism, control of alarmone synthesisSMU.928SMU.927D823_08322D823_08327
TCS-5HK-ScnK RR-ScnRBacteriocin productionSMU.1814SMU.1815AbsentAbsent
TCS-6HK-SpaK RR-SpaRBacteriocin production, self-protection against anti-microbial peptidesSMU.660SMU.659D823_02456D823_02461
TCS-7HK-PhoR RR-YcbLUnknownSMU.1037cSMU.1038cAbsentAbsent
TCS-8HK-KinG RR-LlrGBacteriocin resistance, substrate transport in cell envelope stressSMU.1009SMU.1008D823_04566D823_04561
TCS-9HK-LevS RR-LevRBiofilm formation, acid tolerance, fructan metabolismSMU.1965cSMU.1964cAbsentAbsent
TCS-10HK-LytS RR-LytTBiofilm formation, oxidative stress tolerance, autolysis, fructan metabolism, cell wall metabolismSMU.577 SMU.576D823_00965 D823_00970
TCS-11HK-LiaS RR-LiaRBiofilm formation, acid tolerance, cell envelope stress response, bacteriocin production & resistance, sucrose-dependent adherenceSMU.486 SMU.487D823_03016 D823_03011
TCS-12HK-HK11 RR-RR11UnknownSMU.1548cSMU.1547cD823_06808D823_06803
TCS-13HK-ComD RR-ComEBiofilm formation, quorum sensing, competence development, bacteriocin productionSMU.1916 SMU.1917D823_05333 D823_05328

Only those conserved in S. mutans are discussed for both species. For more information see ref. (41).

All genes shown are conserved for at least seven out of eight strains and the UA159 gene is shown as representative.

Comparing two component systems between S. mutans [eight strains according to (31)] and S. sobrinus DSM 20742 Only those conserved in S. mutans are discussed for both species. For more information see ref. (41). All genes shown are conserved for at least seven out of eight strains and the UA159 gene is shown as representative. TCS-7 (PhoR/YcbL) was shared by the eight S. mutans strains but was absent in S. sobrinus. PhoR is known for sensing environmental phosphate – which can be a limiting factor – in other species (44), but the clear function of TCS-7 in S. mutans is still unknown. TCS-9 (LevRS), which affects the acid tolerance response, is also absent in S. sobrinus DSM 20742. In S. mutans UA159, the levRS gene cluster is flanked by levQ and levT, which code for two carbohydrate-binding proteins. These four genes together constitute a four-component signal transduction system levQRST controlling the transcription of the fructan hydrolase gene (fruA) and a four-gene cluster levDEFG, which encodes a fructose/mannose sugar-PTS located immediately downstream of levQRST (45). S. sobrinus was also found to lack the levQ, levT and levDEFG genes. Taking together, these findings indicate dramatic differences in the regulation of fructan catabolism and the acid tolerance response of S. sobrinus DSM 20742 in comparison to the S. mutans strains. However, other S. sobrinus genes (D823_00365, D823_00410) not shared with S. mutans and related to acid tolerance were found in strain DSM 20742. Finally, TCS-5 (ScnKR) was found to be absent in some S. mutans strains and in S. sobrinus DSM 20742. In S. pyogenes ScnKR is essential for the production of a bacteriocin (SAFF22). In our recent study (41), we therefore inferred that TCS-5 might be involved in the regulation of mutacin production but not in acid tolerance.

Development of competence

Competence development is a complex process involving sophisticated regulatory networks that trigger the capacity of bacterial cells to take up exogenous DNA from the environment. This phenomenon is frequently encountered in bacteria of the oral cavity, e.g. S. mutans (46). In S. mutans, ComX (or SigX), an alternative sigma factor, drives the transcription of the so-called ‘late-competence genes’ required for genetic transformation. ComX activity is induced by the inputs from two types of signaling pathways, namely the competence-stimulating peptide (CSP)-dependent competence regulation system (‘Classical way’, Fig. 2, left side and Table 3) and the XIP-dependent competence regulation system (‘New way’, Fig. 2, right side, Table 3). ComX and the ‘late-competence genes’ regulated by ComX are highly conserved even between the species, indicating that all MS might have the principal ability to be induced to genetic competence. On the other hand, the upstream signaling pathways, described in-depth below, regulating the activity of ComX show large differences.
Fig. 2

Key differences in competence-related genes between S. mutans and S. sobrinus. Those which are missing in S. sobrinus are crossed off. Adapted from references (47, 48).

Table 3

Comparing competence development-related systems between S. mutans UA159 [and orthologs of seven additional strains according to (31)] and S. sobrinus DSM 20742

S. mutans S. sobrinus

GroupNameFunctionEight strainsa DSM 20742
Classical wayComCCompetence stimulating peptide, precursorSMU.1915Absent
ComA/NlmTCompetence factor and non-lantibiotic mutacin transporter ATP-binding/permease proteinSMU.286 SMU.1881cD823_05343 D823_01400
ComB/NlmEAccessory factor for NlmTSMU.287D823_05923
SepMCell surface-associated protease cleavage CSPSMU.518D823_08607
ComDHistidine kinaseSMU.1916D823_05333
ComEResponse regulatorSMU.1917D823_05328 D823_7992b
HtrASerine proteaseSMU.2164D823_03191
New wayComS comX-inducing peptide (XIP) precursorNC_004350.2Absent
(62613-62666)a
ComRComS receptorSMU.61Absent
Alternative wayHdrMHigh-density responsive membrane proteinSMU.1855D823_08222
HdrRHigh-density responsive regulatorSMU.1854Absent
BrsMSMU.2081Absent
BrsRSMU.2080Absent
OppDOligopeptide ABC transporterSMU.258D823_04322
Late competenceComX (SigX)Competence-specific sigma factorSMU.1997D823_08887
ComEACompetence proteinSMU.625D823_08107
ComECCompetence protein; possible integral membrane proteinSMU.626D823_08117
CoiACompetence protein CoiASMU.644D823_01025
EndACompetence-associated membrane nuclease (DNA-entry nuclease)SMU.1523D823_09687
ComGCompetence protein GSMU.1981cD823_01170
ComYDCompetence protein ComYDSMU.1983D823_01160
ComYCCompetence protein ComYC,SMU.1984D823_01155
Possible competence-induced proteinSMU.2075cD823_03558
CinACompetence damage-inducible protein ASMU.2086D823_03593
ComYBCompetence protein; general (type II) secretory pathway proteinSMU.1985D823_01150
ComYALate competence protein; type II secretion system proteinSMU.1987D823_01145
ComFCLate competence protein required for DNA uptakeSMU.499D823_02981
ComFALate competence protein FSMU.498D823_02986
CinACompetence damage-inducible protein ASMU.2086D823_03593

All genes shown are conserved for at least seven out of eight strains and the UA159 gene variant is shown as representative.

The gene D823_7992 is very similar to D823_5328 but found distantly on a different contig.

Key differences in competence-related genes between S. mutans and S. sobrinus. Those which are missing in S. sobrinus are crossed off. Adapted from references (47, 48). Comparing competence development-related systems between S. mutans UA159 [and orthologs of seven additional strains according to (31)] and S. sobrinus DSM 20742 All genes shown are conserved for at least seven out of eight strains and the UA159 gene variant is shown as representative. The gene D823_7992 is very similar to D823_5328 but found distantly on a different contig.

CSP-dependent competence regulation

In S. mutans, the prepeptide of CSP is encoded by comC. Whereas comC is present in all S. mutans strains investigated so far, it is absent in the two annotated strains S. sobrinus DSM 20742 and TCI-107. Apart from this synthase, all genes required for CSP-dependent signaling that are found in S. mutans are also present in S. sobrinus. The membrane bound ABC-transporter (ComAB), the two-component signal transduction system ComDE, the extracellular protease SepM, which is involved in the processing of 21-CSP to the mature 18-CSP, as well as the HtrA protease, which is thought to degrade extracellular CSP (49), were all identified in S. sobrinus. But as the central comC homologue is missing in S. sobrinus, this species cannot develop competence through this signaling pathway, but what about alternatives?

XIP-dependent competence regulation

A new peptide regulatory system (ComSR) that is independent of CSP and directly activates ComX has been identified by Mashburn-Warren et al. (47). The novel autoinducer XIP (sigX inducing peptide) is synthesized as a prepeptide by the synthase ComS. The membrane protein that processes and exports the 17-mer ComS precursor to the active 7-mer pheromone XIP is unknown. Extracellular XIP is internalized through the peptide transporter OppD. Internalized XIP binds to the transcriptional regulator ComR, which is thereby dimerized and activated. The expression of the synthase ComS, as well as the expression of the alternative sigma-factor ComX, resulting in transcription of the complete transformasome, is controlled by ComR. Deletion of the comR or comS gene completely abolished the competence in S. mutans (47). Thus, ComR is the central regulator for competence in S. mutans and is also required for CSP induced competence development. In our previous study (31), the ComSR regulatory system was identified in all of the S. mutans strains, but not in S. sobrinus DSM 20742. Accordingly, despite the presence of comX and the ‘late-competence genes’, we were not able to obtain the genetic competence state of S. sobrinus DSM 20742 experimentally. Interestingly, S. sobrinus DSM 20742 does harbor the OppD peptide transporter for import of extracellular XIP. Thus, all the genes for both signaling pathways for competence are present, with the exception of the respective autoinducer synthases comC and comS, and the essential transcriptional regulator comR.

Autoinducer-independent competence regulation

Under conditions of biofilm growth the HdrMR system, a novel two-gene regulatory system, has been shown to contribute to competence development through the activation of ComX (50, 51). Microarray analysis revealed that both regulators, ComE and HdrR, activate a large set of genes (50, 51). Recently, Xie et al. (52) identified another regulatory system in S. mutans, designated BrsRM, that regulates bacteriocin-related genes but also affects the HdrRM system. In our recent study, HdrR and the complete BrsRM system were found absent in S. sobrinus.

Distribution of bacteriocin-related proteins

Bacteriocins are proteinaceous antimicrobials produced by bacteria to kill or inhibit the growth of similar or closely related bacterial strains. Bacteriocins produced by MS are named ‘mutacins’. As dental plaque, the dominating niche of MS, is a multispecies biofilm community that harbors many microorganisms, mutans group strains have developed a variety of mutacins to inhibit the growth of competitors, such as mitis group streptococci (53–55). In our previous study (31), information about known mutacins as well as mutacin-immunity proteins was collected from the NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and Oralgen (http://www.oralgen.lanl.gov/) databases. The collected protein sequences were used to blast against the proteomes of eight S. mutans strains and S. sobrinus DSM 20742 to see whether or not these known mutacins and corresponding immunity proteins exist in both species in a similar or different pattern. Distributions of identified mutacins and mutacin-immunity proteins are summarized in Table 4. Diversity of Streptococcus bacteriocins has been reported previously (56, 57). An interesting new result is that, in contrast to S. mutans strains, S. sobrinus DSM 20742 does not possess any genes coding for mutacin or mutacin-like proteins.
Table 4

Comparing bacteriocin and corresponding immunity proteins between S. mutans [eight strains according to (31)] and S. sobrinus DSM 20742

S. mutans S. sobrinus

Mutacin/immunity proteinEight strainsDSM 20742
Lantibiotic mutacins
 Mutacin-SmbRareAbsent
Mutacin-IRareAbsent
Mutacin-IIRareAbsent
Mutacin-IIIRareAbsent
Mutacin-K8RareAbsent
Non-lantibiotic bacteriocins
 Mutacin-IV (NlmA)FrequentAbsent
 Mutacin-IV (NlmB)FrequentAbsent
 Mutacin-IV like (SMU.283)ConservedAbsent
Immunity protein of Mutacin-IVHighly conservedPresent
Mutacin-V (CipB)FrequentAbsent
CipI, immunity protein of CipBVery frequentAbsent
Homolog of CipIFrequentPresent
SMU.423 (possible bacteriocin)ConservedPresent
NlmT/ComAConservedPresent
ATP-binding protein of NlmTEFrequentPresent
NlmE/ComB (accessory factor for NlmT)Highly conservedPresent
Comparing bacteriocin and corresponding immunity proteins between S. mutans [eight strains according to (31)] and S. sobrinus DSM 20742 Mutacin-Smb has been identified in S. mutans and S. ratti previously (58, 59). Mutacin-K8 is an ortholog of the bacteriocin Streptococcin A-FF22 identified in group-A streptococci (60), and its production system has also been previously identified in the S. mutans strains K8 (61), KK23, and NN20125 (31). Possibly caused by transposase activity, the complete mutacin-K8 production system can be disrupted leaving partial orthologs which we found in S. mutans AC4446, UA159, 5DC8, and KK21 (31). Lantibiotic mutacins, mutacin-I (62), mutacin-II (63) and mutacin-III (64) are found in only a few strains of S. mutans so far. Mutacin-IV, non-lantibiotic bacteriocins coded by nlmA/B, was discovered first in S. mutans UA140 to be active against the mitis group streptococci (65). We found nlmA/B in most S. mutans strains but not in S. sobrinus DSM 20742, the latter even negative for mutacin-IV-like protein encoding genes. Interestingly, the immunity protein for mutacin-IV (SMU.152) was identified in all mutacin-IV-negative strains including S. sobrinus, consistent with the fact that no inhibition phenomenon has been observed yet among different MS strains. Mutacin-V, another non-lantibiotic peptide coded by cipB, was frequently found in S. mutans strains (exceptions are, however, reference strains ATCC 15175 and NCTC 11060) but not in S. sobrinus DSM 20742. There are two homologs of mutacin-V immunity protein in S. mutans UA159, namely the product of SMU.1913 and CipI (SMU.925) (66, 67); the latter is supposed to be the key factor of immunity. All the S. mutans strains investigated by our group together with S. sobrinus DSM 20742 possess at least one orthologous gene encoding one of the two mutacin-V immunity proteins so that they might not be inhibited by mutacin-V producing strains. Furthermore, a possible non-lantibiotic bacteriocin peptidegene (SMU.423) was found to be conserved in S. mutans and present in S. sobrinus DSM 20742. In addition, putative ComAB (NlmTE), which has been proved to be the transporter complex of mutacin IV or – more likely – for multi-type non-lantibiotic bacteriocins in S. mutans (31, 68), are identified in all S. mutans strains and S. sobrinus. It may very be possible that this bacteriocin is similar to the mutacin isolated from S. sobrinus strain MT6223 that proved to be competitive with S. mutans in rat models (69). To summarize, S. sobrinus DSM 20742 (and confirmed in TCI-107) does not possess any genes coding for mutacin or mutacin-like proteins including Mutacin-Smb, Mutacin-K8, Mutacin-I-III, Mutacin-IV (NlmA and B), and Mutacin-V, although bacteriocin-like proteins from S. sobrinus have been found for individual strains. However, searching among the bacteriocin/immunity genes discovered exclusively in S. sobrinus (and not in S. mutans), two immunity protein encoding genes but no additional bacteriocin-gene were identified (function in brackets): D823_05508 (immunity protein PlnI-like) and D823_03977 (putative bacteriocin immunity protein). The accumulation and conservation of mutacin immunity proteins apparently play an important role for the survival of all MS strains and species in a bacteriocin-rich environment.

Oxidative stress defense systems

For protection against reactive oxygen species (such as O2 −, H2O2, HO·) or adaptation to oxidative stresses, aerobes and facultative anaerobes have evolved efficient defense systems, comprising an array of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase, superoxide dismutase (SOD), alkylhydroperoxide reductase (AhpCF), Dps-like peroxide resistance protein (Dpr), thioredoxin reductase, and glutathione reductase, which have been identified in many bacterial species. By searching for known antioxidant systems in the genomes of sequenced mutans streptococcal strains, we obtained an overview of putative oxidative defense systems (31) summarized in Table 5. Catalase, which catalyzes the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide, was never found in any of the mutans streptococcal strains but other classes of oxygen tolerance-related proteins do exist.
Table 5

Comparing proteins involved in oxygen tolerance between S. mutans [eight strains according to (31)] and S. sobrinus DSM 20742

S. mutans S. sobrinus

ClassNameFunctionEight strainsa DSM 20742
SODSodSuperoxide dismutaseSMU.629D823_08152
AhpF/AhpC systemAhpCAlkyl hydroperoxide reductase, subunit CSMU.764Absent
AhpF (Nox1)Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase, subunit FSMU.765Absent
DprDprPeroxide resistance protein/iron binding proteinSMU.540D823_02352
Thioredoxin systemTrxBThioredoxin reductase (NADPH)SMU.463D823_01947
TrxBThioredoxin reductaseSMU.869D823_01550
TrxAThioredoxinSMU.1869D823_06913
TrxHThioredoxin family proteinSMU.1971cD823_08552
Thioredoxin family proteinSMU.1169cAbsent
TpxThiol peroxidaseSMU.924D823_07595
Glutaredoxin systemGshABGlutathione biosynthesis bifunctional proteinSMU.267cD823_06703
GshRGlutathione reductaseSMU.838D823_04976
GshRGlutathione reductaseSMU.140Absent
NrdHGlutaredoxinSMU.669cD823 05398

All genes shown are conserved for at least seven out of eight strains and the UA159 gene variant is shown as representative.

Comparing proteins involved in oxygen tolerance between S. mutans [eight strains according to (31)] and S. sobrinus DSM 20742 All genes shown are conserved for at least seven out of eight strains and the UA159 gene variant is shown as representative. First, SOD, which catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, was found in all strains of our study conserved including S. sobrinus DSM 20742 and it is present in S. sobrinus TCI-107 in two copies. Next, it has been reported that both the bi-component peroxidase system AhpF/AhpC (catalyzing the NADH-dependent reduction of organic hydroperoxides and/or H2O2 to their respective alcohol) and Dpr (a ferritin-like iron-binding protein) confer tolerance to oxidative stress in S. mutans (70). AhpF/AhpC-genes were present in all S. mutans strains, but were absent in S. sobrinus DSM 20742 (31) indicating that these genes do not form an essential peroxide tolerance system for MS. Indeed, Higuchi et al. (36) found that a double ahpF/ahpC mutant still showed the same level of peroxide tolerance as the defect could be complemented by the S. mutans-dpr gene. Dpr homologs were found in all S. mutans strains and in S. sobrinus underlining the essential function in oxygen tolerance. Thioredoxins are a class of small redox mediator proteins known to be present in all organisms. They are involved in many important biological processes, including redox signaling. The flavor enzyme thioredoxin reductase keeps thioredoxins in the reduced state in a NADPH-dependent reaction (71). They act as electron donors to many proteins including thiol peroxidases (72). Thioredoxin, thioredoxin reductase and thiol peroxidase, the components of the thioredoxin system, were identified in all S. mutans strains and in S. sobrinus DSM 20742. Thioredoxin family proteins (SMU.1971c and SMU.1169c) are found to be present in nearly all strains, except for S. sobrinus DSM 20742, which lacks any ortholog of SMU1169c (31). Finally, glutaredoxins share many functions of thioredoxins. But they are oxidized by their corresponding substrates and reduced by glutathione (GSH) (73). The resulting oxidized glutathione (GSSG) is regenerated by glutathione reductase. Together, these components comprise the glutathione system (74). Several S. mutans strains possess two glutathione reductase orthologs (SMU.140 and SMU.838). In contrast, S. sobrinus DSM 20742 possesses an ortholog for SMU.838 but not for SMU.140, possibly leading to a reduced potential for re-generation of GSH from GSSG and weakening its oxidative resistance.

Link between acidogenicity, aciduricity, biofilm formation, mutacin production, competence and – ultimately – cariogenicity

The main virulence traits of S. mutans – adherence, acidogenicity, aciduricity, biofilm formation and mutacin production – as well as its ability to incorporate foreign DNA into its genome (genetic competence) are controlled or modulated by quorum sensing and thus depending on its own cell number but maybe also on cell numbers of cohabitants. For S. mutans, it has recently been shown that the complete quorum sensing system is induced by co-culture with the human pathogenic fungus Candida albicans (75). Additionally, both strains grow better together than as a monoculture, suggesting that this synergism may lead to enhanced cariogenicity. This could recently be confirmed in an animal model (76). Interestingly, one main cariogenic trait of S. mutans, the synthesis of extracellular glucans and fructans, was strongly inhibited in co-culture (75). Similar studies on S. sobrinus are missing but – without competence so far investigated – such a co-stimulation is not expected. Clearly the influence of inter-species communication for caries development warrants further studies. In summary, this work compares two main cariogenic MS on a whole genome level. Although more aciduric and acidogenic, by many other ecologically important features, S. sobrinus seems to be weaker in its cariogenic potential. As rapid adherence to the pellicle coated tooth surface is crucial for colonization and expressing cariogenic potential, the down-regulation of surface antigen SpaA by the negative regulator Par, which is only found in S. sobrinus but not in S. mutans, could be essential. Furthermore, the lack of genetic competence of S. sobrinus limits its evolutionary potential. However, we have to keep in mind that this analysis is based on about 8–20 annotated S. mutans strains but on only two S. sobrinus strains. In total we found about 470 genes in S. sobrinus DSM 20742 – about half of them hypothetical proteins with no allocated or known function so far – with no orthologs in S. mutans. Thus, S. sobrinus possess much more potential yet to be discovered. Finally, this comparison of genetic inventory (genotypes) might help to describe or predict phenotypes but there are more factors, especially in a very complex habitat like the human oral cavity, which certainly influence the true cariogenic potential of those organisms.
  76 in total

Review 1.  Streptococcus adherence and colonization.

Authors:  Angela H Nobbs; Richard J Lamont; Howard F Jenkinson
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Adsorption of glucosyltransferase to saliva coated hydroxyapatite. Possible mechanism for sucrose dependent bacterial colonization of teeth.

Authors:  G Rŏlla; J E Ciardi; S A Schultz
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1983-04

3.  Enhanced immunogenicity of a genetic chimeric protein consisting of two virulence antigens of Streptococcus mutans and protection against infection.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Christina Jespersgaard; Leticia Lamberty-Mallory; Jannet Katz; Yan Huang; George Hajishengallis; Suzanne M Michalek
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Identification of a novel bacteriocin regulatory system in Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  Zhoujie Xie; Toshinori Okinaga; Guoqing Niu; Fengxia Qi; Justin Merritt
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.501

5.  Molecular biology of oxygen tolerance in lactic acid bacteria: Functions of NADH oxidases and Dpr in oxidative stress.

Authors:  M Higuchi; Y Yamamoto; Y Kamio
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Production of a bacteriocine-like substance by group-A streptococci of M-type 4 and T-pattern 4.

Authors:  D W Johnson; J R Tagg; L W Wannamaker
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Differences in cariogenicity between fresh isolates of Streptococcus sobrinus and Streptococcus mutans.

Authors:  J J de Soet; C van Loveren; A J Lammens; M J Pavicić; C H Homburg; J M ten Cate; J de Graaff
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Studies on strains of Streptococcus mutans isolated from caries-active and caries-free individuals in Iceland.

Authors:  W Peter Holbrook; Margrét O Magnúsdóttir
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 5.474

9.  A genome-wide study of two-component signal transduction systems in eight newly sequenced mutans streptococci strains.

Authors:  Lifu Song; Padhmanand Sudhakar; Wei Wang; Georg Conrads; Anke Brock; Jibin Sun; Irene Wagner-Döbler; An-Ping Zeng
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The evolution of two-component systems in bacteria reveals different strategies for niche adaptation.

Authors:  Eric Alm; Katherine Huang; Adam Arkin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  19 in total

1.  Exploring the Genomic Diversity and Cariogenic Differences of Streptococcus mutans Strains Through Pan-Genome and Comparative Genome Analysis.

Authors:  Peiqi Meng; Chang Lu; Qian Zhang; Jiuxiang Lin; Feng Chen
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  A Novel Competence Pathway in the Oral Pathogen Streptococcus sobrinus.

Authors:  J W Li; R M Wyllie; P A Jensen
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Use of the Er:YAG Laser in Conservative Dentistry: Evaluation of the Microbial Population in Carious Lesions.

Authors:  Chiara Valenti; Stefano Pagano; Silvia Bozza; Enrico Ciurnella; Giuseppe Lomurno; Benito Capobianco; Maddalena Coniglio; Stefano Cianetti; Lorella Marinucci
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Oral microbial profiles of individuals with different levels of sugar intake.

Authors:  Mette K Keller; Christine A Kressirer; Daniel Belstrøm; Svante Twetman; Anne C R Tanner
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.474

Review 5.  Bacteriocin-Antimicrobial Synergy: A Medical and Food Perspective.

Authors:  Harsh Mathur; Des Field; Mary C Rea; Paul D Cotter; Colin Hill; R Paul Ross
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Dental adhesive microtensile bond strength following a biofilm-based in vitro aging model.

Authors:  Aditi Jain; Steve R Armstrong; Jeffrey A Banas; Fang Qian; Rodrigo R Maia; Erica C Teixeira
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Complete Genome Sequences of Streptococcus sobrinus SL1 (ATCC 33478 = DSM 20742), NIDR 6715-7 (ATCC 27351), NIDR 6715-15 (ATCC 27352), and NCTC 10919 (ATCC 33402).

Authors:  Yuting Du; Amitha S Sandur; Naaman M Stanley; Mia J Sales; William G Herbert; Paul A Jensen
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2018-07-26

8.  Isolation and Bacteriocin-Related Typing of Streptococcus dentisani.

Authors:  Georg Conrads; Jacqueline Westenberger; Martha Lürkens; Mohamed M H Abdelbary
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans and S. sobrinus biofilms by liamocins from Aureobasidium pullulans.

Authors:  Timothy D Leathers; Joseph O Rich; Kenneth M Bischoff; Christopher D Skory; Melinda S Nunnally
Journal:  Biotechnol Rep (Amst)       Date:  2018-12-21

10.  The Oral Bacterial Microbiome of Interdental Surfaces in Adolescents According to Carious Risk.

Authors:  Camille Inquimbert; Denis Bourgeois; Manuel Bravo; Stéphane Viennot; Paul Tramini; Juan Carlos Llodra; Nicolas Molinari; Claude Dussart; Nicolas Giraudeau; Florence Carrouel
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.