| Literature DB >> 28839520 |
Mette K Keller1, Christine A Kressirer2,3, Daniel Belstrøm1, Svante Twetman1, Anne C R Tanner2,3.
Abstract
The aim was to compare the oral microbial profiles in young adults with an intake of free sugars above or below the current recommendations by the WHO for sugar consumption. Seventy subjects completed a Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire to establish the proportion of free sugars in relation to the total energy intake (% E). Subjects with <5% E (n = 30) formed the low-sugar group, while those with ≥5% E (n = 40) were regarded as reference group. Saliva and plaque samples were analyzed by qPCR, and 52 of the plaque samples were assayed by HOMINGS. The HOMINGS analysis revealed a comparable core microbiota in plaque samples with Streptococcus, Leptotrichia, Actinobaculum, and Veillonella as predominant. No major differences between groups were revealed by α-diversity testing (p = 0.83), principal component analysis, or correspondence analysis. Higher relative abundance of Streptococcus sobrinus and Prevotella melaninogenica was observed in plaque samples in the reference group. By qPCR, Scardovia wiggsiae was associated with elevated sugar intake. The findings suggests that the amount of ingested sugars had a marginal influence on microbial profiles in dental plaque and saliva. However, some caries-associated species were less abundant in the dental plaque of the low sugar group.Entities:
Keywords: Caries; HOMINGS; oral microbiota; sugar
Year: 2017 PMID: 28839520 PMCID: PMC5560414 DOI: 10.1080/20002297.2017.1355207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Microbiol ISSN: 2000-2297 Impact factor: 5.474
Background data for the two groups with less or more added sugar than 5% of the total energy intake
| <5% of total energy consumption, | ≥5% of total energy consumption, | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years ( | 27 (8.8) | 30 (7.8) |
| Sex, F/M (%) | 24/6 (80/20) | 31/9 (78/22) |
| DMFT ( | 2.0 (3.6) | 4.6 (4.5) |
| Oral hygiene 0/1/2 | 1/15/14 | 1/19/20 |
| Sugar content of total energy (E %) | 3.1 (1.6) | 9.0 (3.7) |
Oral hygiene: less than once per day = 0; once per day = 1; twice per day = 2.
SD, standard deviation.
Comparison of the characteristics of subjects with samples included for assay with subjects with samples excluded
| Plaque samples included, | Plaque samples excluded, | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <5% ( | ≥5% ( | <5% ( | ≥5% ( | |
| Age, years ( | 28 (10.2) | 30 (7.8) | 25 (1.8) | 32 (8.0) |
| Sex, F/M (%) | 16/4 (80/20) | 25/7 (78/22) | 8/2 (78/22) | 6/2 (71/29) |
| DMFT ( | 2.2 (3.9) | 4.7 (4.7) | 1.7 (2.7) | 4.0 (3.8) |
| Oral hygiene 0/1/2 | 0/12/8 | 1/14/17 | 1/3/6 | 0/5/3 |
Added sugar either <5% of the total energy consumption or >5% of the total energy consumption.
Figure 1.Relative abundance of predominant species- and genus-level probe targets. (a) Relative abundance of the 14 most predominant genus-level probe targets in each group. (b) Relative abundance of the 20 most predominant species-level probe targets in each group. An adjusted p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant and is highlighted in red.
Figure 2.Correspondence analysis visualized two-dimensionally with axes expressed as the two foremost inertia values accounting for a cumulative inertia of 20.31%. Samples from the low-sugar group (dark gray) and samples from reference group samples (light gray).
The concentration of DNA (pg DNA/µL) for Scardovia wiggsiae, Streptococcus mutans, total Lactobacillus, and total bacteria in plaque and saliva samples from subjects with different levels of sugar intake
| Plaque, | Saliva, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <5% | ≥5% | <5% | ≥5% | |||
| Median | Median | Median | Median | |||
| 5.6 × 101 | 2.6 × 103 | 0.003 | 3.0 × 102 | 4.0 × 102 | 0.476 | |
| 4.7 × 104 | 3.9 × 104 | 0.840 | 5.7 × 103 | 2.9 × 103 | 0.976 | |
| Total | 2.8 × 104 | 3.0 × 104 | 0.690 | 4.2 × 104 | 3.1 × 104 | 0.887 |
| Total bacteria | 1.2 × 106 | 1.1 × 106 | 0.601 | 1.1 × 106 | 7.0 × 105 | 0.691 |