Literature DB >> 2547468

Efficacy and long term effects of antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin.

J G Thornton1, C Page, G Foote, G R Arthur, L A Tovey, J S Scott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the safety and efficacy of antenatal treatment with anti-D immunoglobulin.
DESIGN: Open study with historical controls.
SETTING: Multicentre study in 17 hospitals in West Yorkshire. PATIENTS: 1238 Rh negative women who delivered Rh positive infants after 34 weeks in their first pregnancy in 1980-1 (group 1) and 2000 similar primigravidas from 1978-9 (group 2). Obstetric data were collected for 616 women in group 1 who had a subsequent pregnancy, 536 similar women in group 2, and 410 Rh positive but otherwise similar primigravidas who delivered in the same hospitals in 1978-81 (group C).
INTERVENTIONS: Anti-D immunoglobulin 100 micrograms intramuscularly was given at 28 and 34 weeks to the mothers in their first pregnancy who delivered in 1980-1. END POINTS: Detection of anti-D antibody in the first or any subsequent pregnancy in groups 1 and 2. For all three groups having subsequent pregnancies gestation at delivery, birth weight, fetal survival at one month, pre-eclampsia defined as blood pressure greater than 140/90 on two occasions more than 12 hours apart, and proteinuria greater than 0.25 milligram.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Antenatal immunisation to Rh(D) occurred in six mothers in group 1 and 32 group 2. Most immunisations occurred in the first or second pregnancy. The rates of abortion, gestation at delivery, birth weight, and fetal survival were not significantly different among the three groups. The incidence of pre-eclampsia was lower in mothers given antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin, but the difference was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin is effective, and the effect of giving it in the first pregnancy persists into at least the second pregnancy. It seems to be safe for the fetus in the index and subsequent pregnancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2547468      PMCID: PMC1836780          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.298.6689.1671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  13 in total

1.  Haemolytic disease of the newborn--the changing scene.

Authors:  L A Tovey
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1986-09

2.  Controversies in Rh prophylaxis. Who needs Rh immune globulin and when should it be given?

Authors:  J M Bowman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Controversies in Rh prophylaxis.

Authors:  P A Hensleigh
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  McMaster conference on prevention of Rh immunization. 28-30 September, 1977.

Authors: 
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.144

5.  Should anti-D immunoglobulin be given antenatally?

Authors:  G H Tovey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-08-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Influence of previous blood-transfusion on incidence of pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  J G Feeney; L A Tovey; J S Scott
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-04-23       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Cost-effectiveness of antepartum prevention of Rh immunization.

Authors:  G W Torrance; A Zipursky
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.430

8.  Sound boards. Rh immunoprophylaxis: is antepartum therapy desirable?

Authors:  J Nusbacher; J R Bove
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-10-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Rh isoimmunization during pregnancy: antenatal prophylaxis.

Authors:  J M Bowman; B Chown; M Lewis; J M Pollock
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1978-03-18       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  The Yorkshire antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin trial in primigravidae.

Authors:  L A Tovey; A Townley; B J Stevenson; J Taverner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-07-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Haematology.

Authors:  N T O'Connor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  The role of antenatal immunoprophylaxis in the prevention of maternal-foetal anti-Rh(D) alloimmunisation.

Authors:  Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno; Angelo D'Alessandro; Federica Rea; Vanessa Piccinini; Liviana Catalano; Gabriele Calizzani; Simonetta Pupella; Giuliano Grazzini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-10-07

4.  Antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin.

Authors:  R Hussey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-26

5.  Plasma half-lives and bioavailability of human monoclonal Rh D antibodies BRAD-3 and BRAD-5 following intramuscular injection into Rh D-negative volunteers.

Authors:  J Goodrick; B Kumpel; D Pamphilon; I Fraser; G Chapman; B Dawes; D Anstee
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  RHD maternal-fetal genotype incompatibility increases schizophrenia susceptibility.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Joni A Turunen; Janet S Sinsheimer; Sonia Minassian; Tiina Paunio; Jouko Lönnqvist; Leena Peltonen; J Arthur Woodward
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-11-18       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Maternal anti-D prophylaxis during pregnancy does not cause neonatal haemolysis.

Authors:  A Maayan-Metzger; T Schwartz; J Sulkes; P Merlob
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 8.  Evidence for maternal-fetal genotype incompatibility as a risk factor for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-04-06

9.  Anti-D monoclonal antibodies from 23 human and rodent cell lines display diverse IgG Fc-glycosylation profiles that determine their clinical efficacy.

Authors:  Belinda M Kumpel; Radka Saldova; Carolien A M Koeleman; Jodie L Abrahams; Agnes Hipgrave Ederveen; Kathryn L Armour; Natalia I Olovnikova; Gestur Vidarsson; Rick Kapur; Pauline M Rudd; Manfred Wuhrer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.