Literature DB >> 11124929

Maternal anti-D prophylaxis during pregnancy does not cause neonatal haemolysis.

A Maayan-Metzger1, T Schwartz, J Sulkes, P Merlob.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate signs of haemolysis in babies of Rh-D negative mothers who underwent prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin during pregnancy.
DESIGN: The following were evaluated in all babies of Rh-D negative mothers born within a three month period in our department: haemoglobin level, packed cell volume, mean corpuscular volume, reticulocytes, bilirubin level, and direct Coombs' test (direct anti-globulin test). The babies were divided into two groups according to number of doses of anti-D immunoglobulin received by the mother (one or two), and then further divided by their Rh status (negative or positive). Findings were also compared with a control group of babies of O-Rh positive mothers.
RESULTS: The study group consisted of 101 babies and the control group of 37 babies. No statistically significant differences were found for any of the haematological variables between the babies of mothers who received one or two doses of anti-D immunoglobulin, or between the Rh negative babies (n = 35), and the controls. Although 20% of the Rh positive babies born to mothers receiving two doses of anti-D immunoglobulin had a positive result in the direct Coombs' test compared with only 2.4% of the babies of mothers treated with only one dose, no signs of haemolysis were documented in the babies with a positive Coombs test.
CONCLUSION: The prevention of Rh isoimmunisation with anti-D immunoglobulin (one or two doses) during pregnancy does not jeopardize the newborn. Blood group typing and direct Coombs' test should be performed in every newborn of an Rh negative mother to establish whether there is a necessity to administer anti-D. In the presence of a positive direct Coombs' test, the type of antibodies should be identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11124929      PMCID: PMC1721201          DOI: 10.1136/fn.84.1.f60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  4 in total

1.  RhD hemolytic disease of the newborn.

Authors:  J M Bowman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The prevention of Rh immunization.

Authors:  J M Bowman
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  1988-09

3.  Efficacy and long term effects of antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin.

Authors:  J G Thornton; C Page; G Foote; G R Arthur; L A Tovey; J S Scott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-06-24

4.  Rh-prophylaxis with immunoglobulin anti-D administered during pregnancy and after delivery.

Authors:  M Hermann; H Kjellman
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl       Date:  1976
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Recommendations for the prevention and treatment of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn.

Authors:  Francesco Bennardello; Serelina Coluzzi; Giuseppe Curciarello; Tullia Todros; Stefania Villa
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Maternal anti-D prophylaxis during pregnancy and risk of hemolysis among preterm infants.

Authors:  A Maayan-Metzger; L Leibovitch; I Schushan-Eisen; I Morag; T Strauss
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  RHD maternal-fetal genotype incompatibility increases schizophrenia susceptibility.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Joni A Turunen; Janet S Sinsheimer; Sonia Minassian; Tiina Paunio; Jouko Lönnqvist; Leena Peltonen; J Arthur Woodward
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-11-18       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Is antenatal RhIg completely safe?

Authors:  Rajeswari Subramaniyan; Karishma Pereira
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2016-03-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.