Literature DB >> 25474505

What we still don't know about invasion genetics.

Dan G Bock1, Celine Caseys, Roger D Cousens, Min A Hahn, Sylvia M Heredia, Sariel Hübner, Kathryn G Turner, Kenneth D Whitney, Loren H Rieseberg.   

Abstract

Publication of The Genetics of Colonizing Species in 1965 launched the field of invasion genetics and highlighted the value of biological invasions as natural ecological and evolutionary experiments. Here, we review the past 50 years of invasion genetics to assess what we have learned and what we still don't know, focusing on the genetic changes associated with invasive lineages and the evolutionary processes driving these changes. We also suggest potential studies to address still-unanswered questions. We now know, for example, that rapid adaptation of invaders is common and generally not limited by genetic variation. On the other hand, and contrary to prevailing opinion 50 years ago, the balance of evidence indicates that population bottlenecks and genetic drift typically have negative effects on invasion success, despite their potential to increase additive genetic variation and the frequency of peak shifts. Numerous unknowns remain, such as the sources of genetic variation, the role of so-called expansion load and the relative importance of propagule pressure vs. genetic diversity for successful establishment. While many such unknowns can be resolved by genomic studies, other questions may require manipulative experiments in model organisms. Such studies complement classical reciprocal transplant and field-based selection experiments, which are needed to link trait variation with components of fitness and population growth rates. We conclude by discussing the potential for studies of invasion genetics to reveal the limits to evolution and to stimulate the development of practical strategies to either minimize or maximize evolutionary responses to environmental change.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; colonization; hybridization; invasion; rapid evolution; weeds

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25474505     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  91 in total

1.  Population mitogenomics provides insights into evolutionary history, source of invasions and diversifying selection in the House Crow (Corvus splendens).

Authors:  Urszula Krzemińska; Hernán E Morales; Chris Greening; Árpád S Nyári; Robyn Wilson; Beng Kah Song; Christopher M Austin; Paul Sunnucks; Alexandra Pavlova; Sadequr Rahman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Trait divergence, not plasticity, determines the success of a newly invasive plant.

Authors:  Gina L Marchini; Caitlin A Maraist; Mitchell B Cruzan
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  The evolutionary significance of polyploidy.

Authors:  Yves Van de Peer; Eshchar Mizrachi; Kathleen Marchal
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Highly dynamic transcriptional reprogramming and shorter isoform shifts under acute stresses during biological invasions.

Authors:  Xuena Huang; Aibin Zhan
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.652

5.  Urban landscape genomics identifies fine-scale gene flow patterns in an avian invasive.

Authors:  G W Low; B Chattopadhyay; K M Garg; M Irestedt; Pgp Ericson; G Yap; Q Tang; S Wu; F E Rheindt
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Beyond propagule pressure: importance of selection during the transport stage of biological invasions.

Authors:  Elizabeta Briski; Farrah T Chan; John A Darling; Velda Lauringson; Hugh J MacIsaac; Aibin Zhan; Sarah A Bailey
Journal:  Front Ecol Environ       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 11.123

7.  Evolutionary origins of genomic adaptations in an invasive copepod.

Authors:  David Ben Stern; Carol Eunmi Lee
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 15.460

8.  A reassessment of the genome size-invasiveness relationship in reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea).

Authors:  Megan A Martinez; Eric J Baack; Stephen M Hovick; Kenneth D Whitney
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion.

Authors:  Brittany S Barker; Janelle E Cocio; Samantha R Anderson; Joseph E Braasch; Feng A Cang; Heather D Gillette; Katrina M Dlugosch
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Global genetic diversity of Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Andrea Gloria-Soria; Diego Ayala; Ambicadutt Bheecarry; Olger Calderon-Arguedas; Dave D Chadee; Marina Chiappero; Maureen Coetzee; Khouaildi Bin Elahee; Ildefonso Fernandez-Salas; Hany A Kamal; Basile Kamgang; Emad I M Khater; Laura D Kramer; Vicki Kramer; Alma Lopez-Solis; Joel Lutomiah; Ademir Martins; Maria Victoria Micieli; Christophe Paupy; Alongkot Ponlawat; Nil Rahola; Syed Basit Rasheed; Joshua B Richardson; Amag A Saleh; Rosa Maria Sanchez-Casas; Gonçalo Seixas; Carla A Sousa; Walter J Tabachnick; Adriana Troyo; Jeffrey R Powell
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.