Daniel P Feghhi1, Daniel Komlos1, Nitin Agarwal1, Sanjeev Sabharwal1. 1. Departments of Orthopaedics (D.P.F., D.K., and S.S.) and Neurological Surgery (N.A.), New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, 90 Bergen Street, Suite 7300, Newark, NJ 07101. E-mail address for S. Sabharwal: sabharsa@njms.rutgers.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increased availability of medical information on the Internet empowers patients to look up answers to questions about their medical conditions. However, the quality of medical information available on the Internet is highly variable. Various tools for the assessment of online medical information have been developed and used to assess the quality and accuracy of medical web sites. In this study we used the LIDA tool (Minervation) to assess the quality of pediatric patient information on the AAOS (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons) and POSNA (Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America) web sites. METHODS: The accessibility, usability, and reliability of online medical information in the "Children" section of the AAOS web site and on the POSNA web site were assessed with use of the LIDA tool. Flesch-Kincaid (FK) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) values were also calculated to assess the readability of the pediatric education material. RESULTS: Patient education materials on each web site scored in the moderate range in assessments of accessibility, usability, and reliability. FK and FRE values indicated that the readability of each web site remained at a somewhat higher (more difficult) level than the recommended benchmark. CONCLUSIONS: The quality and readability of online information for children on the AAOS and POSNA web sites are acceptable but can be improved further. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The quality of online pediatric orthopaedic patient education materials may affect communication with patients and their caregivers, and further investigation and modification of quality are needed.
BACKGROUND: Increased availability of medical information on the Internet empowers patients to look up answers to questions about their medical conditions. However, the quality of medical information available on the Internet is highly variable. Various tools for the assessment of online medical information have been developed and used to assess the quality and accuracy of medical web sites. In this study we used the LIDA tool (Minervation) to assess the quality of pediatric patient information on the AAOS (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons) and POSNA (Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America) web sites. METHODS: The accessibility, usability, and reliability of online medical information in the "Children" section of the AAOS web site and on the POSNA web site were assessed with use of the LIDA tool. Flesch-Kincaid (FK) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) values were also calculated to assess the readability of the pediatric education material. RESULTS:Patient education materials on each web site scored in the moderate range in assessments of accessibility, usability, and reliability. FK and FRE values indicated that the readability of each web site remained at a somewhat higher (more difficult) level than the recommended benchmark. CONCLUSIONS: The quality and readability of online information for children on the AAOS and POSNA web sites are acceptable but can be improved further. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The quality of online pediatric orthopaedic patient education materials may affect communication with patients and their caregivers, and further investigation and modification of quality are needed.
Authors: Christopher Michel; Christopher Dijanic; George Abdelmalek; Suleiman Sudah; Daniel Kerrigan; George Gorgy; Praveen Yalamanchili Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2022-07-11
Authors: John W Stelzer; Ian J Wellington; Maxwell T Trudeau; Michael R Mancini; Matthew R LeVasseur; James C Messina; Augustus D Mazzocca Journal: JSES Int Date: 2021-09-28