Literature DB >> 15788162

Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action.

J A Stevens1.   

Abstract

Four experiments were completed to characterize the utilization of visual imagery and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action. In Experiment 1, movement time functions for a motor imagery human locomotion task conformed to a speed-accuracy trade-off similar to Fitts' Law, whereas those for a visual imagery object motion task did not. However, modality-specific interference effects in Experiment 2 demonstrate visual and motor imagery as cooperative processes when the action represented is tied to visual coordinates in space. Biomechanic-specific motor interference effects found in Experiment 3 suggest one basis for separation of processing channels within motor imagery. Finally, in Experiment 4 representations of motor actions were found to be generated using only visual imagery under certain circumstances: namely, when the imaginer represented the motor action of another individual while placed at an opposing viewpoint. These results suggest that the modality of representation recruited to generate images of human action is dependent on the dynamic relationship between the individual, movement, and environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15788162     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  38 in total

1.  Contribution of the primary motor cortex to motor imagery: a subthreshold TMS study.

Authors:  Barbara Pelgrims; Nicolas Michaux; Etienne Olivier; Michael Andres
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Thoughts in space: the impact of environmental surround on cognitive processing.

Authors:  Jennifer A Stevens; Vanessa Duffie; Peter M Vishton
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

3.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability dependent upon imagined force level.

Authors:  Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Izumi Umehara; Hiroki Nakata; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The influence of individual motor imagery ability on cerebral recruitment during gait imagery.

Authors:  Marian van der Meulen; Gilles Allali; Sebastian W Rieger; Frédéric Assal; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Imitation and matching of meaningless gestures: distinct involvement from motor and visual imagery.

Authors:  Mathieu Lesourd; Jordan Navarro; Josselin Baumard; Christophe Jarry; Didier Le Gall; François Osiurak
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-23

6.  Misperceiving the speed-accuracy tradeoff: imagined movements and perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Scott J Young; Jay Pratt; Tom Chau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Implementation of specific motor expertise during a mental rotation task of hands.

Authors:  Hamdi Habacha; Corinne Molinaro; Montassar Tabben; Laure Lejeune-Poutrain
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Motor imagery of locomotion with an additional load: actual load experience does not affect differences between physical and mental durations.

Authors:  Jörn Munzert; Klaus Blischke; Britta Krüger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Imagining handwriting movements in a usual or unusual position: effect of posture congruency on visual and kinesthetic motor imagery.

Authors:  Jessica Guilbert; Jonathan Fernandez; Michèle Molina; Marie-France Morin; Denis Alamargot
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-08-02

10.  Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion: evidence from a novel continuous pointing method.

Authors:  Jennifer L Campos; Joshua H Siegle; Betty J Mohler; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.