| Literature DB >> 25471220 |
Shuang Wang1, Peng Zhang2, Fei He3, Ji-Gui Wang4, Jia-Zeng Sun5, Zhi-Li Li6, Bao Yi7, Ji Xi8, Ya-Ping Mao9, Qiang Hou10, Dao-Li Yuan11, Zi-Ding Zhang12, Wei-Quan Liu13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The avian influenza virus (AIV) causes frequent disease with high morbidity and mortality. RNA interference (RNAi) has been shown to provide an effective antiviral defense in animals, and several studies have focused on harnessing small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) to inhibit viral infections. In addition, single chain variable fragments (scFvs) contain the complete antigen binding site, and specific scFvs can bind to and neutralize viruses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25471220 PMCID: PMC4264339 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-014-0208-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Figure 1Yeast two-hybrid assay and chromogenic results. (A) Constructs used in the yeast two-hybrid assays for screening of specific scFvs against HA protein. A cDNA library of scFvs was subcloned into a pGADT7 yeast two-hybrid prey vector for fusion to the GAL4 transactivation domain (AD). (B) Screening for specific scFvs against HA. Yeast clones containing bait and prey vectors were selected on SD/-Leu/-Trp/-His/-Ade plate. Fourteen positive scFv fragments appeared blue through X-gal staining.
Figure 2Screening of scFvs by ZDOCK module of DiscoveryStudio software. (A) Homology modeling of HA protein and scFvs. (B) Molecular docking between scFvs and HA protein. (C) The high-affinity scFvs were confirmed again by yeast two-hybrid assay. Chromogenic results showed scFv1, scFv2 and scFv3 were all positive and the blank controls were negative. (D) Expression of HA and scFvs in yeast as detected by western blot. Upper row: detection of HA expression by anti-Myc Epitope Tag.; Lower row: detection of scFvs expression by anti-HA Epitope Tag.
Binding values of HA protien and positive scFvs
|
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -2.094395 | 0.294107 | 1.59388 | 3 | 178 | 135 | 19.82 | 2 | -1 | -1 | -154.472 |
| 2 | -0.733038 | 1.524811 | -2.844718 | 8 | 29 | 206 | 21.7 | 26 | 6 | -1 | -149.158 |
| 6 | -0.733038 | 0.997766 | -2.693871 | 163 | 3 | 183 | 22.6 | 6 | 73 | 1 | -137.171 |
| 5 | -0.314159 | 0.632797 | 1.989858 | 201 | 185 | 47 | 20 | 2 | -1 | -1 | -131.664 |
| 11 | -1.570796 | 1.554776 | 0.100351 | 10 | 23 | 2 | 22.56 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -118.933 |
| 3 | -1.989675 | 0.934873 | -2.010822 | 162 | 187 | 2 | 20.52 | 12 | 21 | -1 | -116.42 |
| 13 | -0.523599 | 1.135813 | -2.658866 | 178 | 9 | 174 | 19.24 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -116.378 |
| 4 | -0.733038 | 1.743328 | 0.663347 | 19 | 164 | 189 | 19.84 | 2 | -1 | -1 | -116.115 |
| 7 | -1.675516 | 0.65244 | 2.197129 | 8 | 33 | 178 | 19.38 | 3 | -1 | -1 | -114.846 |
| 8 | -0.837758 | 1.889815 | 2.70157 | 14 | 22 | 21 | 24.82 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -111.05 |
| 14 | 1.832596 | 0.41964 | 2.974122 | 14 | 3 | 135 | 22 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -110.35 |
| 9 | -0.314159 | 0.869748 | 2.095969 | 183 | 159 | 16 | 23.3 | 2 | 20 | 1 | -107.702 |
| 12 | 2.094395 | 1.736875 | 3.023612 | 4 | 39 | 183 | 19.78 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -107.003 |
| 10 | 2.879793 | 1.184361 | 0.625864 | 19 | 21 | 0 | 18.7 | 1 | 17 | -1 | -82.9037 |
Sequences of oligonucleotides used for construction of libraries
|
|
|
|---|---|
| RT-VH | GGAGGAGACGATGACTTC |
| RT-VL | TTATAGGACGGTCAGGGTTGTC |
| VH-P1 | ATGAGCCCACTCGTCTC |
| VH-P2 | AGAGCCACCTCCGCCTGAACCGCCTCCACCGGAGGAGACGATGACTTC |
| VL-P1 | GGCGGAGGTGGCTCTGGCGGTGGCGGGTCGGCGCTGACTCAGCCGT |
| VL-P2 | TTATAGGACGGTCAGGGTTGTC |
| VHp1-NdeI | GGGAATTCCATATGGCCGTGACGTTGGAC |
| VLp2-BamHI | CGCGGATCCTTATAGGACGGTCAGGGTTGTC |
| IRES-P1 |
|
| GCCGTGACGTTGGACG | |
| IRES-P2 | TTA |
Synthetic linker used for overlap extension PCR shown underlined.
Restriction enzyme sites used for cloning shown in bold.
Signal peptide sequence and c-Myc epitope tag sequence shown italics.
Figure 3Verification of the binding activity of scFvs expressed by DF-1 to FJ13 virus. (A) Transient expression of scFvs in serum-free cultured DF-1 cells indirectly detected by EGFP. (B) Western blot assay used to directly detect the transient expression of scFvs (~30 KDa) in serum-free cultured DF-1 cells. (C) Indirect-ELISA assay used to assess the titer of scFvs binding to HA protein. (D) IFA used to detect the virus binding activity of scFvs. After infection by FJ13 virus (yellow) for 36 h, MDCK cells (red) were subjected to IFA using scFv1, scFv2, scFv3 and monoclonal antibody against AIV H5N1 subtype HA protein as primary antibodies. The positive control used the 1:300 anti-AIV H5N1 HA mAb and the negative used antibody diluent as the primary antibodies. (E) Virus neutralization of ScFvs, detected by IFA. The scFvs and anti-AIV H5N1 HA mAb (1:30, as the positive control) were incubated with FJ13 virus (200CCID50, yellow ) respectively for 1h before infection of MDCK cells (red). The negative control used antibody diluent instead. Anti-AIV H5N1 HA mAb was used as the primary antibody. In (D) and (E), the cells were counterstained with PI (red). Data are from 3 independent experiments (mean ± SD). Statistical significance was analyzed by Student’s t test; *P <0.05; ** P <0.01; ns, not significant.
Figure 4siRNA in combination with scFv1 against FJ13 virus in DF-1 cells. (A) Transient transfection of NP604 and DF-1 cells by pIRES2-scFv1. The negative control was transfected by pIRES2-EGFP. (B) Expression of scFv1 in NP604 and DF-1 cells detected by western blot. (C) mRNA levels of AIV FJ13 analyzed by qPCR from 24 h to 60 h p.i. in DF-1, NP604, scFv and scFv-NP604 cells. All measurements were normalized to expression of β-actin genes, and the copies of HA gene mRNAs were quantified by comparison with a standard curve derived from known amounts of pEASY-HA. (D) All cells were infected with 100 CCID50 of FJ13. Virus titers of supernatant samples collected at 60 h p.i. were determined as CCID50 in normal MDCK cells. Data are from 3 independent experiments (mean ± SD). Statistical significance was analyzed by Student’s t test; *P <0.05; **P <0.01; ns, not significant.