BACKGROUND: Women with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) have an elevated fracture risk. We therefore compared the associations of health behaviours and clinical factors with bone mineral density (BMD) and bone remodelling between premenopausal women with and without T1DM to inform potential interventions. METHODS: Participants included women with T1DM (n = 89) from the Wisconsin Diabetes Registry Study and age-matched and race-matched controls without diabetes (n = 76). Peripheral (heel and forearm) and central (hip and spine) BMD, markers of bone resorption and formation, bone cell signalling, glycaemic control, and kidney function were assessed. Health behaviours and medical history were self-reported. RESULTS: In controls, but not in women with T1DM, older age was associated with lower bone resorption (p ≤ 0.006) and formation (p = 0.0007). Body mass index was positively associated with heel and forearm BMD in both controls and T1DM women (all p < 0.0001), but with hip and spine BMD only in controls (p ≤ 0.005). Worse glycaemic control during the previous 10 years, greater alcohol intake, history of smoking, and lack of physical activity were associated with poorer bone outcomes only in women with T1DM (all p ≤ 0.002), whereas use of hormonal contraceptives was related to low bone formation in both women with and without T1DM (all p ≤ 0.006). Diabetes duration, insulin dose, residual C-peptide, and kidney function were not associated with bone in T1DM. CONCLUSIONS: Age and body mass index may not predict bone health in T1DM women. However, modifiable behaviours such as optimizing glycaemic control, limiting substance and hormonal contraceptive use, and increasing physical activity may improve bone health in T1DM women.
BACKGROUND:Women with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) have an elevated fracture risk. We therefore compared the associations of health behaviours and clinical factors with bone mineral density (BMD) and bone remodelling between premenopausal women with and without T1DM to inform potential interventions. METHODS:Participants included women with T1DM (n = 89) from the Wisconsin Diabetes Registry Study and age-matched and race-matched controls without diabetes (n = 76). Peripheral (heel and forearm) and central (hip and spine) BMD, markers of bone resorption and formation, bone cell signalling, glycaemic control, and kidney function were assessed. Health behaviours and medical history were self-reported. RESULTS: In controls, but not in women with T1DM, older age was associated with lower bone resorption (p ≤ 0.006) and formation (p = 0.0007). Body mass index was positively associated with heel and forearm BMD in both controls and T1DM women (all p < 0.0001), but with hip and spine BMD only in controls (p ≤ 0.005). Worse glycaemic control during the previous 10 years, greater alcohol intake, history of smoking, and lack of physical activity were associated with poorer bone outcomes only in women with T1DM (all p ≤ 0.002), whereas use of hormonal contraceptives was related to low bone formation in both women with and without T1DM (all p ≤ 0.006). Diabetes duration, insulin dose, residual C-peptide, and kidney function were not associated with bone in T1DM. CONCLUSIONS: Age and body mass index may not predict bone health in T1DM women. However, modifiable behaviours such as optimizing glycaemic control, limiting substance and hormonal contraceptive use, and increasing physical activity may improve bone health in T1DM women.
Authors: Kai G Kahl; Wiebke Greggersen; Sebastian Rudolf; Beate M Stoeckelhuber; Claudia U Bergmann-Koester; Leif Dibbelt; Ulrich Schweiger Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Bo Abrahamsen; Jacob Vb Hjelmborg; Paul Kostenuik; Lis S Stilgren; Kirsten Kyvik; Stephen Adamu; Kim Brixen; Bente L Langdahl Journal: Bone Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Kim C Donaghue; Jan M Fairchild; Maria E Craig; Albert K Chan; Stephen Hing; Lucy R Cutler; Neville J Howard; Martin Silink Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Elsa S Strotmeyer; Jane A Cauley; Trevor J Orchard; Ann R Steenkiste; Janice S Dorman Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: W C Willett; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; C Bain; J Witschi; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1985-07 Impact factor: 4.897