Literature DB >> 25468892

Corneal cross-linking in keratoconus using the standard and rapid treatment protocol: differences in demarcation line and 12-month outcomes.

Sara Brittingham1, Christoph Tappeiner1, Beatrice E Frueh1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the occurrence rate and depth of the demarcation line and topographical outcome after corneal cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus using two different treatment protocols.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 131 eyes with progressive keratoconus treated with CXL using riboflavin and UV-A was performed. Eyes were treated either with the standard Dresden protocol (30 minutes irradiation, 3 mW/cm(2), UV-XTM 1000) or a rapid protocol (10 minutes irradiation, 9 mW/cm(2), UV-XTM 2000). The presence and depth of the corneal demarcation line was assessed with an anterior segment optical coherence tomography device 1 month after CXL by a masked observer. Corneal topography and tomography was performed at baseline and at 12-month follow-up with Pentacam and the TMS (Topographic Modeling System) device.
RESULTS: In the standard protocol group, 76.5% (62/81) of treated corneas revealed a demarcation line 1 month after CXL, whereas such a demarcation line was observed in only 22% (11/50) of eyes treated with the rapid protocol (P < 0.0001). The demarcation line was significantly more superficial in the rapid protocol group (P = 0.004). Corneal topography values between baseline and 12 months after CXL showed a mean change of -0.76 diopters (D) in Kmax (SD ± 2.7) in the standard protocol group versus a mean change of +0.72 D in Kmax (SD ± 1.5) in the rapid protocol (P = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: The rapid CXL protocol negatively influences the occurrence and depth of the demarcation line 1 month after CXL. Our results show a negative effect on the topographical outcome 1 year after CXL. © ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cornea; corneal topography; cross-linking; demarcation line; keratoconus; rapid protocol; riboflavin UV-A treatment; standard Dresden protocol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25468892     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  17 in total

Review 1.  Current perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL).

Authors:  Sandeepani K Subasinghe; Kelechi C Ogbuehi; George J Dias
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Corneal crosslinking (CXL) with 18-mW/cm2 irradiance and 5.4-J/cm2 radiant exposure-early postoperative safety.

Authors:  Isaak Fischinger; Theo G Seiler; Karthiga Santhirasegaram; Moritz Pettenkofer; Chris P Lohmann; Daniel Zapp
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Mechanical outcome of accelerated corneal crosslinking evaluated by Brillouin microscopy.

Authors:  Joshua N Webb; Johnny P Su; Giuliano Scarcelli
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Long-term database analysis of conventional and accelerated crosslinked keratoconic mid-European eyes.

Authors:  Efstathios Vounotrypidis; Alexis Athanasiou; Karsten Kortüm; Daniel Kook; Mehdi Shajari; Siegfried Priglinger; Wolfgang J Mayer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  [Treatment indications for corneal crosslinking and clinical results of new corneal crosslinking techniques].

Authors:  Klara Borgardts; Johannes Menzel-Severing; Gerd Geerling; Theo G Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Efficacy and safety of transepithelial collagen cross linking for progressive keratoconus.

Authors:  Sameer Shahid Ameen; Mohammad Asim Mehboob; Kashif Ali
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  One-Year Follow-Up of Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Accelerated Transepithelial Corneal Cross-Linking in Pediatric Patients With Progressive Keratoconus.

Authors:  Weijun Jian; Mi Tian; Xiaoyu Zhang; Ling Sun; Yang Shen; Meiyan Li; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-07

Review 8.  Collagen cross-linking: when and how? A review of the state of the art of the technique and new perspectives.

Authors:  Leonardo Mastropasqua
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-29

Review 9.  Recent advances in corneal collagen cross-linking.

Authors:  Gitansha Shreyas Sachdev; Mahipal Sachdev
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Correlation between central stromal demarcation line depth and changes in K values after corneal cross-linking (CXL).

Authors:  Niklas Pircher; Jan Lammer; Stephan Holzer; Andreas Gschließer; Ruth Donner; Stefan Pieh; Gerald Schmidinger
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.