Literature DB >> 25468336

A refined reaction-diffusion model of tau-microtubule dynamics and its application in FDAP analysis.

Maxim Igaev1, Dennis Janning2, Frederik Sündermann2, Benedikt Niewidok2, Roland Brandt2, Wolfgang Junge3.   

Abstract

Fluorescence decay after photoactivation (FDAP) and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) are well established approaches for studying the interaction of the microtubule (MT)-associated protein tau with MTs in neuronal cells. Previous interpretations of FDAP/FRAP data have revealed dwell times of tau on MTs in the range of several seconds. However, this is difficult to reconcile with a dwell time recently measured by single-molecule analysis in neuronal processes that was shorter by two orders of magnitude. Questioning the validity of previously used phenomenological interpretations of FDAP/FRAP data, we have generalized the standard two-state reaction-diffusion equations by 1), accounting for the parallel and discrete arrangement of MTs in cell processes (i.e., homogeneous versus heterogeneous distribution of tau-binding sites); and 2), explicitly considering both active (diffusion upon MTs) and passive (piggybacking upon MTs at rates of slow axonal transport) motion of bound tau. For some idealized cases, analytical solutions were derived. By comparing them with the full numerical solution and Monte Carlo simulations, the respective validity domains were mapped. Interpretation of our FDAP data (from processes of neuronally differentiated PC12 cells) in light of the heterogeneous formalism yielded independent estimates for the association (∼2 ms) and dwell (∼100 ms) times of tau to/on a single MT rather than in an MT array. The dwell time was shorter by orders of magnitude than that in a previous report where a homogeneous topology of MTs was assumed. We found that the diffusion of bound tau was negligible in vivo, in contrast to an earlier report that tau diffuses along the MT lattice in vitro. Methodologically, our results demonstrate that the heterogeneity of binding sites cannot be ignored when dealing with reaction-diffusion of cytoskeleton-associated proteins. Physiologically, the results reveal the behavior of tau in cellular processes, which is noticeably different from that in vitro.
Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25468336      PMCID: PMC4255205          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  47 in total

1.  Single-molecule investigation of the interference between kinesin, tau and MAP2c.

Authors:  Arne Seitz; Hiroaki Kojima; Kazuhiro Oiwa; Eva-Maria Mandelkow; Young-Hwa Song; Eckhard Mandelkow
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Rapid and intermittent cotransport of slow component-b proteins.

Authors:  Subhojit Roy; Matthew J Winton; Mark M Black; John Q Trojanowski; Virginia M-Y Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Tau protein diffuses along the microtubule lattice.

Authors:  Maike H Hinrichs; Avesta Jalal; Bernhard Brenner; Eckhard Mandelkow; Satish Kumar; Tim Scholz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Tracer diffusion in fibre networks: the impact of spatial fluctuations in the fibre distribution.

Authors:  Avik P Chatterjee
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.333

5.  Changes in the organization of the neuritic cytoskeleton during nerve growth factor-activated differentiation of PC12 cells: a serial electron microscopic study of the development and control of neurite shape.

Authors:  J R Jacobs; J K Stevens
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 6.  Microtubule organization and dynamics dependent on microtubule-associated proteins.

Authors:  N Hirokawa
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 8.382

7.  Three distinct axonal transport rates for tau, tubulin, and other microtubule-associated proteins: evidence for dynamic interactions of tau with microtubules in vivo.

Authors:  M Mercken; I Fischer; K S Kosik; R A Nixon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Kinetic stabilization of microtubule dynamics at steady state by tau and microtubule-binding domains of tau.

Authors:  D Panda; B L Goode; S C Feinstein; L Wilson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-09-05       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Tau-mediated cytotoxicity in a pseudohyperphosphorylation model of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Thomas Fath; Jochen Eidenmüller; Roland Brandt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Modulation of microtubule dynamics by tau in living cells: implications for development and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Janis M Bunker; Leslie Wilson; Mary Ann Jordan; Stuart C Feinstein
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-03-12       Impact factor: 4.138

View more
  11 in total

1.  International Meeting Molecular Neurodegeneration: News and Views in Molecular Neuroscience in Health and Disease. Delmenhorst, Germany, July 20-22, 2015.

Authors:  Illana Gozes; Peter W Baas; Christiane Richter-Landsberg
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.444

2.  Annexins A2 and A6 interact with the extreme N terminus of tau and thereby contribute to tau's axonal localization.

Authors:  Anne Gauthier-Kemper; María Suárez Alonso; Frederik Sündermann; Benedikt Niewidok; Maria-Pilar Fernandez; Lidia Bakota; Jürgen Josef Heinisch; Roland Brandt
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Microtubule Polymerization and Cross-Link Dynamics Explain Axonal Stiffness and Damage.

Authors:  Rijk de Rooij; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Apparent anomalous diffusion and non-Gaussian distributions in a simple mobile-immobile transport model with Poissonian switching.

Authors:  Timo J Doerries; Aleksei V Chechkin; Ralf Metzler
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.293

Review 5.  Tau Biology and Tau-Directed Therapies for Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Lidia Bakota; Roland Brandt
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Presence of a carboxy-terminal pseudorepeat and disease-like pseudohyperphosphorylation critically influence tau's interaction with microtubules in axon-like processes.

Authors:  Benedikt Niewidok; Maxim Igaev; Frederik Sündermann; Dennis Janning; Lidia Bakota; Roland Brandt
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Local Nucleation of Microtubule Bundles through Tubulin Concentration into a Condensed Tau Phase.

Authors:  Amayra Hernández-Vega; Marcus Braun; Lara Scharrel; Marcus Jahnel; Susanne Wegmann; Bradley T Hyman; Simon Alberti; Stefan Diez; Anthony A Hyman
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Physical Biology of Axonal Damage.

Authors:  Rijk de Rooij; Ellen Kuhl
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.505

Review 9.  Dendritic/Post-synaptic Tau and Early Pathology of Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Xiaomin Yin; Chenhao Zhao; Yanyan Qiu; Zheng Zhou; Junze Bao; Wei Qian
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.639

10.  Single-molecule tracking of tau reveals fast kiss-and-hop interaction with microtubules in living neurons.

Authors:  Dennis Janning; Maxim Igaev; Frederik Sündermann; Jörg Brühmann; Oliver Beutel; Jürgen J Heinisch; Lidia Bakota; Jacob Piehler; Wolfgang Junge; Roland Brandt
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.