Literature DB >> 25468332

3D traction stresses activate protease-dependent invasion of cancer cells.

Aereas Aung1, Young N Seo1, Shaoying Lu1, Yingxiao Wang1, Colin Jamora2, Juan C del Álamo3, Shyni Varghese4.   

Abstract

Cell invasion and migration that occurs, for example, in cancer metastasis is rooted in the ability of cells to navigate through varying levels of physical constraint exerted by the extracellular matrix. Cancer cells can invade matrices in either a protease-independent or a protease-dependent manner. An emerging critical component that influences the mode of cell invasion is the traction stresses generated by the cells in response to the physicostructural properties of the extracellular matrix. In this study, we have developed a reference-free quantitative assay for measuring three-dimensional (3D) traction stresses generated by cells during the initial stages of invasion into matrices exerting varying levels of mechanical resistance. Our results show that as cells encounter higher mechanical resistance, a larger fraction of them shift to protease-mediated invasion, and this process begins at lower values of cell invasion depth. On the other hand, the compressive stress generated by the cells at the onset of protease-mediated invasion is found to be independent of matrix stiffness, suggesting that 3D traction stress is a key factor in triggering protease-mediated cancer cell invasion. At low 3D compressive traction stresses, cells utilize bleb formation to indent the matrix in a protease independent manner. However, at higher stress values, cells utilize invadopodia-like structures to mediate protease-dependent invasion into the 3D matrix. The critical value of compressive traction stress at the transition from a protease-independent to a protease-dependent mode of invasion is found to be ∼165 Pa.
Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25468332      PMCID: PMC4255420          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  47 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of matrix metalloproteinase activities in the medium of cultured synoviocytes using zymography.

Authors:  Linda Troeberg; Hideaki Nagase
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2003

Review 2.  Extracellular matrix determinants of proteolytic and non-proteolytic cell migration.

Authors:  Katarina Wolf; Peter Friedl
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 20.808

3.  Mapping local matrix remodeling induced by a migrating tumor cell using three-dimensional multiple-particle tracking.

Authors:  Ryan J Bloom; Jerry P George; Alfredo Celedon; Sean X Sun; Denis Wirtz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The Arp2/3 complex mediates multigeneration dendritic protrusions for efficient 3-dimensional cancer cell migration.

Authors:  Anjil Giri; Saumendra Bajpai; Nicholaus Trenton; Hasini Jayatilaka; Gregory D Longmore; Denis Wirtz
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Contractility of the cell rear drives invasion of breast tumor cells in 3D Matrigel.

Authors:  Renaud Poincloux; Olivier Collin; Floria Lizárraga; Maryse Romao; Marcel Debray; Matthieu Piel; Philippe Chavrier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  A perspective on cancer cell metastasis.

Authors:  Christine L Chaffer; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate.

Authors:  Britta Trappmann; Julien E Gautrot; John T Connelly; Daniel G T Strange; Yuan Li; Michelle L Oyen; Martien A Cohen Stuart; Heike Boehm; Bojun Li; Viola Vogel; Joachim P Spatz; Fiona M Watt; Wilhelm T S Huck
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 8.  Plasticity of cell migration: a multiscale tuning model.

Authors:  Peter Friedl; Katarina Wolf
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Quantitative FRET imaging to visualize the invasiveness of live breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Shaoying Lu; Yi Wang; He Huang; Yijia Pan; Eric J Chaney; Stephen A Boppart; Howard Ozer; Alex Y Strongin; Yingxiao Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration: mesenchymal-amoeboid transition after blocking of pericellular proteolysis.

Authors:  Katarina Wolf; Irina Mazo; Harry Leung; Katharina Engelke; Ulrich H von Andrian; Elena I Deryugina; Alex Y Strongin; Eva-B Bröcker; Peter Friedl
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-01-13       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Ex Vivo Tumor-on-a-Chip Platforms to Study Intercellular Interactions within the Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Vardhman Kumar; Shyni Varghese
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 9.933

2.  Endothelial cell sensing, restructuring, and invasion in collagen hydrogel structures.

Authors:  Y Hosseini; M Agah; S S Verbridge
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Switching from protease-independent to protease-dependent cancer cell invasion.

Authors:  Lijuan He; Denis Wirtz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Three-dimensional balance of cortical tension and axial contractility enables fast amoeboid migration.

Authors:  Begoña Álvarez-González; Ruedi Meili; Effie Bastounis; Richard A Firtel; Juan C Lasheras; Juan C Del Álamo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Comparison of viscoelastic properties of cancer and normal thyroid cells on different stiffness substrates.

Authors:  Carmela Rianna; Manfred Radmacher
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 6.  Invadosomes are coming: new insights into function and disease relevance.

Authors:  Elyse K Paterson; Sara A Courtneidge
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 5.542

7.  Physical confinement induces malignant transformation in mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Yen-Chun Lu; Tinyi Chu; Matthew S Hall; Dah-Jiun Fu; Quanming Shi; Alan Chiu; Duo An; Long-Hai Wang; Yehudah Pardo; Teresa Southard; Charles G Danko; Jan Liphardt; Alexander Yu Nikitin; Mingming Wu; Claudia Fischbach; Scott Coonrod; Minglin Ma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Dynamic interplay between tumour, stroma and immune system can drive or prevent tumour progression.

Authors:  R J Seager; Cynthia Hajal; Fabian Spill; Roger D Kamm; Muhammad H Zaman
Journal:  Converg Sci Phys Oncol       Date:  2017-07-28

Review 9.  Impact of the physical microenvironment on tumor progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Fabian Spill; Daniel S Reynolds; Roger D Kamm; Muhammad H Zaman
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 10.  Regulation of invadopodia by mechanical signaling.

Authors:  Aron Parekh; Alissa M Weaver
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.905

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.