Julian David Güster1, Stephanie Valerie Weissleder1, Chia-Jung Busch2, Malte Kriegs1, Cordula Petersen3, Rainald Knecht2, Ekkehard Dikomey1, Thorsten Rieckmann4. 1. Laboratory of Radiobiology & Experimental Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. 2. Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. 3. Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. 4. Laboratory of Radiobiology & Experimental Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. Electronic address: t.rieckmann@uke.uni-hamburg.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: HPV-negative and HPV-positive HNSCC comprise distinct tumor entities with different biological characteristics. Specific regimens for the comparably well curable HPV-positive entity that reduce side effects without compromising outcome have yet to be established. Therefore, we tested here whether the inhibition of EGFR or PARP may be used to specifically enhance the radiosensitivity of HPV-positive HNSCC cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiments were performed with five HPV/p16-positive HNSCC cell lines. Inhibitors used were cetuximab, olaparib and PF-00477736. The respective inhibition of EGFR, PARP and Chk1 was evaluated by Western blot, immunofluorescence analysis and assessment of cell cycle distribution. Cell survival was assessed by colony formation assay. RESULTS: Inhibition of EGFR by cetuximab failed to radiosensitize any of the HPV-positive HNSCC cell lines tested. In contrast, PARP-inhibition resulted in a substantial radiosensitization of all strains, with the sensitization being further enhanced by the additional inhibition of Chk1. CONCLUSIONS: PARP-inhibition effectively radiosensitizes HPV-positive HNSCC cells and may therefore represent a viable alternative to chemotherapy possibly even allowing for a reduction in radiation dose. For the latter, PARP-inhibition may be combined with the inhibition of Chk1. In contrast, the inhibition of EGFR cannot be expected to radiosensitize HPV-positive HNSCC through the modulation of cellular radiosensitivity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: HPV-negative and HPV-positive HNSCC comprise distinct tumor entities with different biological characteristics. Specific regimens for the comparably well curable HPV-positive entity that reduce side effects without compromising outcome have yet to be established. Therefore, we tested here whether the inhibition of EGFR or PARP may be used to specifically enhance the radiosensitivity of HPV-positive HNSCC cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiments were performed with five HPV/p16-positive HNSCC cell lines. Inhibitors used were cetuximab, olaparib and PF-00477736. The respective inhibition of EGFR, PARP and Chk1 was evaluated by Western blot, immunofluorescence analysis and assessment of cell cycle distribution. Cell survival was assessed by colony formation assay. RESULTS: Inhibition of EGFR by cetuximab failed to radiosensitize any of the HPV-positive HNSCC cell lines tested. In contrast, PARP-inhibition resulted in a substantial radiosensitization of all strains, with the sensitization being further enhanced by the additional inhibition of Chk1. CONCLUSIONS:PARP-inhibition effectively radiosensitizes HPV-positive HNSCC cells and may therefore represent a viable alternative to chemotherapy possibly even allowing for a reduction in radiation dose. For the latter, PARP-inhibition may be combined with the inhibition of Chk1. In contrast, the inhibition of EGFR cannot be expected to radiosensitize HPV-positive HNSCC through the modulation of cellular radiosensitivity.
Authors: Jessica M Molkentine; David P Molkentine; Kathleen A Bridges; Tongxin Xie; Liangpeng Yang; Aakash Sheth; Timothy P Heffernan; David A Clump; Alma Z Faust; Robert L Ferris; Jeffrey N Myers; Mitchell J Frederick; Kathryn A Mason; Raymond E Meyn; Curtis R Pickering; Heath D Skinner Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: Michael T Spiotto; Cullen M Taniguchi; Ann H Klopp; Lauren E Colbert; Steven H Lin; Li Wang; Mitchell J Frederick; Abdullah A Osman; Curtis R Pickering; Steven J Frank Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-10 Impact factor: 5.421
Authors: Stuart E Samuels; Avraham Eisbruch; Jonathan J Beitler; June Corry; Carol R Bradford; Nabil F Saba; Michiel W M van den Brekel; Robert Smee; Primož Strojan; Carlos Suárez; William M Mendenhall; Robert P Takes; Juan P Rodrigo; Missak Haigentz; Alexander D Rapidis; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 3.236
Authors: Liam Welsh; Rafal Panek; Dualta McQuaid; Alex Dunlop; Maria Schmidt; Angela Riddell; Dow-Mu Koh; Simon Doran; Iain Murray; Yong Du; Sue Chua; Vibeke Hansen; Kee H Wong; Jamie Dean; Sarah Gulliford; Shreerang Bhide; Martin O Leach; Christopher Nutting; Kevin Harrington; Kate Newbold Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Stephanie Wurster; Fabian Hennes; Ann C Parplys; Jasna I Seelbach; Wael Y Mansour; Alexandra Zielinski; Cordula Petersen; Till S Clauditz; Adrian Münscher; Anna A Friedl; Kerstin Borgmann Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-03-01
Authors: Alice N Weaver; Tiffiny S Cooper; Marcela Rodriguez; Hoa Q Trummell; James A Bonner; Eben L Rosenthal; Eddy S Yang Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2015-09-29