Literature DB >> 25465898

Surface and deep structures in graphics comprehension.

Wolfgang Schnotz1, Christiane Baadte.   

Abstract

Comprehension of graphics can be considered as a process of schema-mediated structure mapping from external graphics on internal mental models. Two experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that graphics possess a perceptible surface structure as well as a semantic deep structure both of which affect mental model construction. The same content was presented to different groups of learners by graphics from different perspectives with different surface structures but the same deep structure. Deep structures were complementary: major features of the learning content in one experiment became minor features in the other experiment, and vice versa. Text was held constant. Participants were asked to read, understand, and memorize the learning material. Furthermore, they were either instructed to process the material from the perspective supported by the graphic or from an alternative perspective, or they received no further instruction. After learning, they were asked to recall the learning content from different perspectives by completing graphs of different formats as accurately as possible. Learners' recall was more accurate if the format of recall was the same as the learning format which indicates surface structure influences. However, participants also showed more accurate recall when they remembered the content from a perspective emphasizing the deep structure, regardless of the graphics format presented before. This included better recall of what they had not seen than of what they really had seen before. That is, deep structure effects overrode surface effects. Depending on context conditions, stimulation of additional cognitive processing by instruction had partially positive and partially negative effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25465898     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0490-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  7 in total

1.  Visual imagery can impede reasoning.

Authors:  Markus Knauff; P N Johnson-Laird
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

2.  Reasoning, models, and images: behavioral measures and cortical activity.

Authors:  Markus Knauff; Thomas Fangmeier; Christian C Ruff; P N Johnson-Laird
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Discourse comprehension.

Authors:  A C Graesser; K K Millis; R A Zwaan
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Spatial reasoning with external visualizations: what matters is what you see, not whether you interact.

Authors:  Madeleine Keehner; Mary Hegarty; Cheryl Cohen; Peter Khooshabeh; Daniel R Montello
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-10

5.  Visual routines.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1984-12

6.  Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: a functional MRI study.

Authors:  Markus Knauff; Thomas Mulack; Jan Kassubek; Helmut R Salih; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-04

7.  The time course of information extraction from instructional diagrams.

Authors:  Alexander Eitel; Katharina Scheiter; Anne Schüler
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2012-12
  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  When Words and Graphs Move the Eyes: The Processing of Multimodal Causal Relations.

Authors:  Giovanni Parodi; Cristóbal Julio; Inés Recio
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 0.957

2.  Epistemic Network Analyses of Economics Students' Graph Understanding: An Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Sebastian Brückner; Jan Schneider; Olga Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia; Hendrik Drachsler
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Multiple mental representations in picture processing.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schnotz; Georg Hauck; Neil H Schwartz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-06-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.