Literature DB >> 25465882

Reliability and validity of the dimensional features of generalized anxiety disorder.

Lauren A Rutter1, Timothy A Brown2.   

Abstract

The reliability and validity of the dimensional features of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) were examined in a diverse sample of 508 outpatients with anxiety and mood disorders who underwent two independent administrations of the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: Lifetime version (ADIS-IV-L; Di Nardo, Brown, & Barlow, 1994). Inter-rater reliability was higher in the full sample than in patients with current GAD. Additionally, the presence of a mood disorder weakened inter-rater reliability. We also explored the unique contribution of excessiveness and uncontrollability of worry to various clinical outcomes and found that excessiveness predicted anxiety, depression, and stress self-report measures, and uncontrollability predicted clinical severity and number of diagnoses. Findings are discussed with regard to their implications for the classification of GAD (e.g., utility of dimension-based assessment to improve the classification of psychological disorders).
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic criteria; Dimensional classification; GAD; Reliability; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25465882      PMCID: PMC4315716          DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anxiety Disord        ISSN: 0887-6185


  22 in total

1.  On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.

Authors:  Robert C MacCallum; Shaobo Zhang; Kristopher J Preacher; Derek D Rucker
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-03

2.  The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). II. Multisite test-retest reliability.

Authors:  J B Williams; M Gibbon; M B First; R L Spitzer; M Davies; J Borus; M J Howes; J Kane; H G Pope; B Rounsaville
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1992-08

3.  Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire.

Authors:  T J Meyer; M L Miller; R L Metzger; T D Borkovec
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1990

4.  A comparison of three worry questionnaires.

Authors:  G C Davey
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1993-01

5.  Reliability of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: implications for the classification of emotional disorders.

Authors:  T A Brown; P A Di Nardo; C L Lehman; L A Campbell
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2001-02

6.  Reliability of anxiety assessment. I. Diagnostic agreement.

Authors:  S Mannuzza; A J Fyer; L Y Martin; M S Gallops; J Endicott; J Gorman; M R Liebowitz; D F Klein
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1989-12

7.  Psychometric properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in a clinical anxiety disorders sample.

Authors:  T A Brown; M M Antony; D H Barlow
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1992-01

8.  Reliability of DSM-III anxiety disorder categories using a new structured interview.

Authors:  P A Di Nardo; G T O'Brien; D H Barlow; M T Waddell; E B Blanchard
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1983-10

Review 9.  Comorbidity among anxiety disorders: implications for treatment and DSM-IV.

Authors:  T A Brown; D H Barlow
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-12

Review 10.  Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications.

Authors:  L A Clark; D Watson
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1991-08
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacotherapy in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Novel Experimental Medicine Models and Emerging Drug Targets.

Authors:  David S Baldwin; Ruihua Hou; Robert Gordon; Nathan T M Huneke; Matthew Garner
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  The lifetime prevalence and impact of generalized anxiety disorders in an epidemiologic Italian National Survey carried out by clinicians by means of semi-structured interviews.

Authors:  Antonio Preti; Roberto Demontis; Giulia Cossu; Goce Kalcev; Federico Cabras; Maria Francesca Moro; Ferdinando Romano; Matteo Balestrieri; Filippo Caraci; Liliana Dell'Osso; Guido Di Sciascio; Filippo Drago; Maria Carolina Hardoy; Rita Roncone; Carlo Faravelli; Cesar Ivan Aviles Gonzalez; Matthias Angermayer; Mauro Giovanni Carta
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.630

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.