Literature DB >> 25465415

Microsatellite unstable gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinomas: a new clinicopathologic entity.

Nora Sahnane1, Daniela Furlan2, Matilde Monti1, Chiara Romualdi1, Alessandro Vanoli1, Emanuela Vicari1, Enrico Solcia1, Carlo Capella1, Fausto Sessa1, Stefano La Rosa1.   

Abstract

Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) are heterogeneous neoplasms characterized by poor outcome. Microsatellite instability (MSI) has recently been found in colorectal NECs showing a better prognosis than expected. However, the frequency of MSI in a large series of GEP-NEC/MANECs is still unknown. In this work, we investigated the incidence of MSI in GEP-NEC/MANECs and characterized their clinicopathologic and molecular features. MSI analysis and immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2) were performed in 89 GEP-NEC/MANECs (six esophageal, 77 gastrointestinal, three pancreatic, and three of the gallbladder). Methylation of 34 genes was studied by methylation-specific multiplex ligation probe amplification. Mutation analysis of BRAF and KRAS was assessed by PCR-pyrosequencing analysis. MSI was observed in 11 NEC/MANECs (12.4%): seven intestinal and four gastric. All but two MSI-cases showed MLH1 methylation and loss of MLH1 protein. The remaining two MSI-cancers showed lack of MSH2 or PMS2 immunohistochemical expression. MSI-NEC/MANECs showed higher methylation levels than microsatellite stable NEC/MANECs (40.6% vs 20.2% methylated genes respectively, P<0.001). BRAF mutation was detected in six out of 88 cases (7%) and KRAS mutation was identified in 15 cases (17%). BRAF mutation was associated with MSI (P<0.0008), while KRAS status did not correlate with any clinicopathologic or molecular feature. Vascular invasion (P=0.0003) and MSI (P=0.0084) were identified as the only independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. We conclude that MSI identifies a subset of gastric and intestinal NEC/MANECs with distinct biology and better prognosis. MSI-NEC/MANECs resemble MSI-gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas for frequency, molecular profile and pathogenetic mechanisms.
© 2015 Society for Endocrinology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MANEC; NEC; gene methylation; microsatellite instability; mismatch repair; neuroendocrine carcinomas

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25465415     DOI: 10.1530/ERC-14-0410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer        ISSN: 1351-0088            Impact factor:   5.678


  39 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of (epi)genetics in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Moving towards liquid biopsies.

Authors:  Gitta Boons; Timon Vandamme; Marc Peeters; Guy Van Camp; Ken Op de Beeck
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  G3 GEP NENs category: are basic and clinical investigations well integrated?

Authors:  Massimo Milione; Nicola Fazio
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 3.  Management of Well-Differentiated High-Grade (G3) Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Mohamad Bassam Sonbol; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-08-19

4.  EPB41L5 is Associated With the Metastatic Potential of Low-grade Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  James Saller; Shabnam Seydafkan; Mohammad Shahid; Manoj Gadara; Mauro Cives; Steven A Eschrich; David Boulware; Jonathan R Strosberg; Nasir Aejaz; Domenico Coppola
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.069

Review 5.  Genomics of High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor with High-Grade Features (G3 NET) and Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (NEC) of Various Anatomic Sites.

Authors:  Silvia Uccella; Stefano La Rosa; Jasna Metovic; Deborah Marchiori; Jean-Yves Scoazec; Marco Volante; Ozgur Mete; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 6.  Immunohistochemical Biomarkers of Gastrointestinal, Pancreatic, Pulmonary, and Thymic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Silvia Uccella; Stefano La Rosa; Marco Volante; Mauro Papotti
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.943

7.  SOX2 and Rb1 in esophageal small-cell carcinoma: their possible involvement in pathogenesis.

Authors:  Hirotaka Ishida; Atsuko Kasajima; Takashi Kamei; Tsuyoshi Miura; Naomi Oka; Samaneh Yazdani; Yohei Ozawa; Fumiyoshi Fujishima; Akira Sakurada; Yasuhiro Nakamura; Yoichi Tanaka; Masafumi Kurosumi; Yuichi Ishikawa; Yoshinori Okada; Noriaki Ohuchi; Hironobu Sasano
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 8.  Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Esophagus: State of the Art in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management.

Authors:  Dimitrios Schizas; Aikaterini Mastoraki; George I Kirkilesis; Athanasios D Sioulas; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Evangelos P Misiakos; Nikolaos Arkadopoulos; Theodore Liakakos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-12

9.  Difference in survival between right- versus left-sided colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Ge-Han Xu; Hua-Wei Zou; Ashley B Grossman
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2019 Nov.       Impact factor: 3.066

10.  Colorectal mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas and neuroendocrine carcinomas are genetically closely related to colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Moritz Jesinghaus; Björn Konukiewitz; Gisela Keller; Matthias Kloor; Katja Steiger; Magdalena Reiche; Roland Penzel; Volker Endris; Ruza Arsenic; Gratiana Hermann; Albrecht Stenzinger; Wilko Weichert; Nicole Pfarr; Günter Klöppel
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.