Literature DB >> 25464065

Can serving-size labels reduce the portion-size effect? A pilot study.

Samantha Spanos1, Andree S Kenda2, Lenny R Vartanian3.   

Abstract

Research has shown that the bigger the portion that people are served, the more food they eat; this phenomenon is referred to as the portion-size effect. Providing objective serving-size information on food products has been shown to reduce the influence of external food cues on people's eating behavior. The current study examined whether providing objective serving-size information would also reduce the portion-size effect. 100 female participants were served either a small or large portion of pizza in the context of a taste test. The large portion was either unlabeled, labeled as "Contains 2 servings," or labeled as "Contains 4 servings." Food intake was lower when the large portion was labeled "Contains 4 servings" compared to when it was labeled "Contains 2 servings." Moreover, participants' intake in the large portion/4 servings condition was statistically similar to the intake of participants in the small portion condition. Thus, the standard portion-size effect was observed when the large portion was unlabeled or was labeled as "Contains 2 servings," but not when the large portion was labeled as "Contains 4 servings". These findings suggest that providing serving-size information can reduce the portion-size effect, but that the specific content (and not just the presence) of serving-size information is important in determining food intake.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  College women; Food intake; Labeling; Portion size; Serving size

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25464065     DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Behav        ISSN: 1471-0153


  10 in total

Review 1.  Potential moderators of the portion size effect.

Authors:  Faris M Zuraikat; Alissa D Smethers; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  Gender, Age, Hunger, and Body Mass Index as Factors Influencing Portion Size Estimation and Ideal Portion Sizes.

Authors:  Kalina Duszka; Markus Hechenberger; Irene Dolak; Deni Kobiljak; Jürgen König
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-11

3.  The bogus taste test: Validity as a measure of laboratory food intake.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Ashleigh Haynes; Charlotte A Hardman; Eva Kemps; Suzanne Higgs; Andrew Jones
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Portion Size of Energy-Dense Foods among French and UK Adults by BMI Status.

Authors:  Holly L Rippin; Jayne Hutchinson; Jo Jewell; Joao J Breda; Janet E Cade
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Consumer Understanding, Perception and Interpretation of Serving Size Information on Food Labels: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Klazine Van der Horst; Tamara Bucher; Kerith Duncanson; Beatrice Murawski; David Labbe
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 6.  Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; Ian Shemilt; Theresa M Marteau; Susan A Jebb; Hannah B Lewis; Yinghui Wei; Julian P T Higgins; David Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-14

7.  Health goal priming as a situated intervention tool: how to benefit from nonconscious motivational routes to health behaviour.

Authors:  Esther K Papies
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-05-19

8.  Large Variations in Declared Serving Sizes of Packaged Foods in Australia: A Need for Serving Size Standardisation?

Authors:  Suzie Yang; Luke Gemming; Anna Rangan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Impact of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Portion Size Selection: An Experimental Study in a French Cohort.

Authors:  Manon Egnell; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Pilar Galan; Mathilde Touvier; Mike Rayner; Jo Jewell; João Breda; Serge Hercberg; Chantal Julia
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  That's My Cue to Eat: A Systematic Review of the Persuasiveness of Front-of-Pack Cues on Food Packages for Children vs. Adults.

Authors:  Lotte Hallez; Yara Qutteina; Maxime Raedschelders; Filip Boen; Tim Smits
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 5.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.