Camilla S Hanson1, Steve J Chadban, Jeremy R Chapman, Jonathan C Craig, Germaine Wong, Angelique F Ralph, Allison Tong. 1. 1 Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2 Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia. 3 Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. 4 Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 5 Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Living kidney donation offers superior outcomes over deceased organ donation, but incurs psychosocial and ethical challenges for recipients because of the risks imposed on their donor. We aimed to describe the beliefs, attitudes, and expectations of patients with chronic kidney disease toward receiving a living kidney donor transplant. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies of patients' attitudes toward living kidney donation using a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases to February 2013. The findings were analyzed using thematic synthesis. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies (n ≥ 1791 participants) were included. We identified six themes: prioritizing own health (better graft survival, accepting risk, and desperate aversion to dialysis), guilt and responsibility (jeopardizing donor health, anticipating donor regret, and causing donor inconvenience), ambivalence and uncertainty (doubting transplant urgency, insufficient information, confronted by unfamiliarity, and prognostic uncertainty), seeking decisional validation (a familial obligation, alleviating family burden, reciprocal benefits for donors, respecting donor autonomy, external reassurance, and religious approval), needing social support (avoiding family conflict, unrelenting indebtedness, and emotional isolation), and cautious donor recruitment (self-advocacy, lacking self-confidence, avoiding donor coercion, emotional vulnerability, respecting cultural, and religious taboos). CONCLUSION: Enhanced education and psychosocial support may help clarify, validate, and address patients' concerns regarding donor outcomes, guilt, relationship tensions, and donor recruitment. This may encourage informed decision-making, increase access to living kidney donation, and improve psychosocial adjustment for transplant recipients.
BACKGROUND: Living kidney donation offers superior outcomes over deceased organ donation, but incurs psychosocial and ethical challenges for recipients because of the risks imposed on their donor. We aimed to describe the beliefs, attitudes, and expectations of patients with chronic kidney disease toward receiving a living kidney donor transplant. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies of patients' attitudes toward living kidney donation using a comprehensive literature search of electronic databases to February 2013. The findings were analyzed using thematic synthesis. RESULTS: Thirty-nine studies (n ≥ 1791 participants) were included. We identified six themes: prioritizing own health (better graft survival, accepting risk, and desperate aversion to dialysis), guilt and responsibility (jeopardizing donor health, anticipating donor regret, and causing donor inconvenience), ambivalence and uncertainty (doubting transplant urgency, insufficient information, confronted by unfamiliarity, and prognostic uncertainty), seeking decisional validation (a familial obligation, alleviating family burden, reciprocal benefits for donors, respecting donor autonomy, external reassurance, and religious approval), needing social support (avoiding family conflict, unrelenting indebtedness, and emotional isolation), and cautious donor recruitment (self-advocacy, lacking self-confidence, avoiding donor coercion, emotional vulnerability, respecting cultural, and religious taboos). CONCLUSION: Enhanced education and psychosocial support may help clarify, validate, and address patients' concerns regarding donor outcomes, guilt, relationship tensions, and donor recruitment. This may encourage informed decision-making, increase access to living kidney donation, and improve psychosocial adjustment for transplant recipients.
Authors: Nicole DePasquale; Matthew J Ellis; Debra L Sudan; Patti L Ephraim; Lisa M McElroy; Dinushika Mohottige; Clemontina A Davenport; Xiyuan Zhang; Sarah B Peskoe; Tara S Strigo; Ashley N Cabacungan; Iris Pounds; Jennie A Riley; Margaret Falkovic; L Ebony Boulware Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Elaine Ku; Brian K Lee; Charles E McCulloch; Garrett R Roll; Barbara Grimes; Deborah Adey; Kirsten L Johansen Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 5.385
Authors: A Cozette Killian; Rhiannon D Reed; Alexis Carter; M Chandler McLeod; Brittany A Shelton; Vineeta Kumar; Haiyan Qu; Paul A MacLennan; Babak J Orandi; Robert M Cannon; Douglas Anderson; Michael J Hanaway; Jayme E Locke Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2020-12-24 Impact factor: 3.125
Authors: Diana A Wu; Matthew L Robb; Christopher J E Watson; John L R Forsythe; Charles R V Tomson; John Cairns; Paul Roderick; Rachel J Johnson; Rommel Ravanan; Damian Fogarty; Clare Bradley; Andrea Gibbons; Wendy Metcalfe; Heather Draper; Andrew J Bradley; Gabriel C Oniscu Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 5.992