Literature DB >> 25463693

Effects of commercially available pneumatic compression on muscle glycogen recovery after exercise.

Nathan A Keck1, John S Cuddy, Walter S Hailes, Charles L Dumke, Brent C Ruby.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of pneumatic compression pants on postexercise glycogen resynthesis. Active male subjects (n = 10) completed 2 trials consisting of a 90-minute glycogen depleting ride, followed by 4 hours of recovery with either a pneumatic compression device (PCD) or passive recovery (PR) in a random counterbalanced order. A carbohydrate beverage (1.8 g·kg bodyweight) was provided at 0 and 2 hours after exercise. Muscle biopsies (vastus lateralis) were obtained immediately and 4 hours after exercise for glycogen analyses. Blood samples were collected throughout recovery to measure glucose and insulin. Eight fingerstick blood samples for lactate were collected in the last 20 minutes of the exercise period and during the initial portion of the recovery period. Heart rate was monitored throughout the trial. During the PCD trial, subjects recovered using a commercially available recovery device (NormaTec PCD) operational at 0-60 and 120-180 minutes into recovery period. The same PCD was worn during the PR trial but was not turned on to create pulsatile pressures. There was no difference in muscle glycogen resynthesis during the recovery period (6.9 ± 0.8 and 6.9 ± 0.5 mmol·kg wet wt·h for the PR and PCD trials, respectively). Blood glucose, insulin, and lactate concentrations changed with respect to time but were not different between trials (p > 0.05). The use of PCD did not alter the rate of muscle glycogen resynthesis, blood lactate, or blood glucose and insulin concentrations associated with a postexercise oral glucose load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25463693     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  Effects of an external pneumatic compression device vs static compression garment on peripheral circulation and markers of sports performance and recovery.

Authors:  Julia C Blumkaitis; Jessica M Moon; Kayla M Ratliff; Richard A Stecker; Scott R Richmond; Kyle L Sunderland; Chad M Kerksick; Jeffrey S Martin; Petey W Mumford
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Concomitant external pneumatic compression treatment with consecutive days of high intensity interval training reduces markers of proteolysis.

Authors:  Cody T Haun; Michael D Roberts; Matthew A Romero; Shelby C Osburn; James C Healy; Angelique N Moore; Christopher B Mobley; Paul A Roberson; Wesley C Kephart; Petey W Mumford; Michael D Goodlett; David D Pascoe; Jeffrey S Martin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Neither Peristaltic Pulse Dynamic Compressions nor Heat Therapy Accelerate Glycogen Resynthesis after Intermittent Running.

Authors:  Kyoungrae Kim; Christopher K Kargl; Bohyun Ro; Qifan Song; Kimberly Stein; Timothy P Gavin; Bruno T Roseguini
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2021-11-01

4.  Comparison of a Pneumatic Compression Device to a Compression Garment During Recovery from DOMS.

Authors:  Molly Winke; Shelby Williamson
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-05-01

Review 5.  Accelerating Recovery from Exercise-Induced Muscle Injuries in Triathletes: Considerations for Olympic Distance Races.

Authors:  Thilo Hotfiel; Isabel Mayer; Moritz Huettel; Matthias Wilhelm Hoppe; Martin Engelhardt; Christoph Lutter; Klaus Pöttgen; Rafael Heiss; Tom Kastner; Casper Grim
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.