Literature DB >> 25463553

Flexible cue combination in the guidance of attention in visual search.

John Brand1, Chris Oriet2, Aaron P Johnson3, Jeremy M Wolfe4.   

Abstract

Hodsoll and Humphreys (2001) have assessed the relative contributions of stimulus-driven and user-driven knowledge on linearly- and nonlinearly separable searches. However, the target feature used to determine linear separability in their task (i.e., target size) was required to locate the target. In the present work, we investigated the contributions of stimulus-driven and user-driven knowledge when a linearly- or a nonlinearly-separable feature is available but not required for target identification. We asked observers to complete a series of standard color×orientation conjunction searches in which target size was either linearly- or nonlinearly separable from the size of the distractors. When guidance by color×orientation and guidance by size information are both available, observers rely on whichever information results in the best search efficiency. This is the case irrespective of whether we provide target foreknowledge by blocking stimulus conditions, suggesting that feature information is used in both a stimulus-driven and a user-driven fashion.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Linear separability; Relational guidance hypothesis; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25463553      PMCID: PMC4318648          DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  20 in total

1.  Driving attention with the top down: the relative contribution of target templates to the linear separability effect in the size dimension.

Authors:  J Hodsoll; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-07

2.  The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-05

3.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; K R Cave; S L Franzel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Saliency effects across dimensions in visual search.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset.

Authors:  S Friedman-Hill; J M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Does linear separability really matter? Complex visual search is explained by simple search.

Authors:  T Vighneshvel; S P Arun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Color-relation-based capture occurs globally.

Authors:  Huimin Hua; Jie Zhang; Yanju Li; Feng Du
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.