Literature DB >> 25463034

The opportunities of mining historical and collective data in drug discovery.

Anne Mai Wassermann1, Eugen Lounkine2, John W Davies2, Meir Glick2, L Miguel Camargo3.   

Abstract

Vast amounts of bioactivity data have been generated for small molecules across public and corporate domains. Biological signatures, either derived from systematic profiling efforts or from existing historical assay data, have been successfully employed for small molecule mechanism-of-action elucidation, drug repositioning, hit expansion and screening subset design. This article reviews different types of biological descriptors and applications, and we demonstrate how biological data can outlive the original purpose or project for which it was generated. By comparing 150 HTS campaigns run at Novartis over the past decade on the basis of their active and inactive chemical matter, we highlight the opportunities and challenges associated with cross-project learning in drug discovery.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25463034     DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Discov Today        ISSN: 1359-6446            Impact factor:   7.851


  8 in total

1.  Combining structural and bioactivity-based fingerprints improves prediction performance and scaffold hopping capability.

Authors:  Oliver Laufkötter; Noé Sturm; Jürgen Bajorath; Hongming Chen; Ola Engkvist
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 5.514

2.  Pharmacological affinity fingerprints derived from bioactivity data for the identification of designer drugs.

Authors:  Kedan He
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 8.489

3.  Open PHACTS computational protocols for in silico target validation of cellular phenotypic screens: knowing the knowns.

Authors:  D Digles; B Zdrazil; J-M Neefs; H Van Vlijmen; C Herhaus; A Caracoti; J Brea; B Roibás; M I Loza; N Queralt-Rosinach; L I Furlong; A Gaulton; L Bartek; S Senger; C Chichester; O Engkvist; C T Evelo; N I Franklin; D Marren; G F Ecker; E Jacoby
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.597

4.  Data driven polypharmacological drug design for lung cancer: analyses for targeting ALK, MET, and EGFR.

Authors:  Dilip Narayanan; Osman A B S M Gani; Franz X E Gruber; Richard A Engh
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.514

5.  QSAR-derived affinity fingerprints (part 1): fingerprint construction and modeling performance for similarity searching, bioactivity classification and scaffold hopping.

Authors:  C Škuta; I Cortés-Ciriano; W Dehaen; P Kříž; G J P van Westen; I V Tetko; A Bender; D Svozil
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 6.  Data-driven approaches used for compound library design, hit triage and bioactivity modeling in high-throughput screening.

Authors:  Shardul Paricharak; Oscar Méndez-Lucio; Aakash Chavan Ravindranath; Andreas Bender; Adriaan P IJzerman; Gerard J P van Westen
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 7.  Applications of Deep-Learning in Exploiting Large-Scale and Heterogeneous Compound Data in Industrial Pharmaceutical Research.

Authors:  Laurianne David; Josep Arús-Pous; Johan Karlsson; Ola Engkvist; Esben Jannik Bjerrum; Thierry Kogej; Jan M Kriegl; Bernd Beck; Hongming Chen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Bioactivity descriptors for uncharacterized chemical compounds.

Authors:  Martino Bertoni; Miquel Duran-Frigola; Pau Badia-I-Mompel; Eduardo Pauls; Modesto Orozco-Ruiz; Oriol Guitart-Pla; Víctor Alcalde; Víctor M Diaz; Antoni Berenguer-Llergo; Isabelle Brun-Heath; Núria Villegas; Antonio García de Herreros; Patrick Aloy
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.