Literature DB >> 25462688

Object visibility alters the relative contribution of ventral visual stream and mirror neuron system to goal anticipation during action observation.

Marc Thioux1, Christian Keysers2.   

Abstract

We used fMRI to study the effect of hiding the target of a grasping action on the cerebral activity of an observer whose task was to anticipate the size of the object being grasped. Activity in the putative mirror neuron system (pMNS) was higher when the target was concealed from the view of the observer and anticipating the size of the object being grasped requested paying attention to the hand kinematics. In contrast, activity in ventral visual areas outside the pMNS increased when the target was fully visible, and the performance improved in this condition. A repetition suppression analysis demonstrated that in full view, the size of the object being grasped by the actor was encoded in the ventral visual stream. Dynamic causal modeling showed that monitoring a grasping action increased the coupling between the parietal and ventral premotor nodes of the pMNS. The modulation of the functional connectivity between these nodes was correlated with the subject's capability to detect the size of hidden objects. In full view, synaptic activity increased within the ventral visual stream, and the connectivity with the pMNS was diminished. The re-enactment of observed actions in the pMNS is crucial when interpreting others' actions requires paying attention to the body kinematics. However, when the context permits, visual-spatial information processing may complement pMNS computations for improved action anticipation accuracy.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action perception; Dynamic causal modeling; Embodied cognition; Forward models; Repetition suppression; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25462688      PMCID: PMC4968654          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  103 in total

1.  Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion.

Authors:  E Grossman; M Donnelly; R Price; D Pickens; V Morgan; G Neighbor; R Blake
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Neuronal circuits of the neocortex.

Authors:  Rodney J Douglas; Kevan A C Martin
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Compensatory plasticity in the action observation network: virtual lesions of STS enhance anticipatory simulation of seen actions.

Authors:  Alessio Avenanti; Laura Annella; Matteo Candidi; Cosimo Urgesi; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Marta Maieron; Alessio Avenanti; Emmanuele Tidoni; Franco Fabbro; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Object presence modulates activity within the somatosensory component of the action observation network.

Authors:  Luca Turella; Federico Tubaldi; Michael Erb; Wolfgang Grodd; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  More than one pathway to action understanding.

Authors:  James M Kilner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Kathryn E Lee; James V Haxby; Alex Martin
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Progressive ideomotor apraxia: evidence for a selective impairment of the action production system.

Authors:  S Z Rapcsak; C Ochipa; K C Anderson; H Poizner
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Emily H Trittschuh; Jim M Monti; M Marsel Mesulam; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  10 in total

1.  Timing of grip and goal activation during action perception: a priming study.

Authors:  Jérémy Decroix; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  What's she doing in the kitchen? Context helps when actions are hard to recognize.

Authors:  Moritz F Wurm; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

3.  Effective connectivity of the human mirror neuron system during social cognition.

Authors:  Sadjad Sadeghi; Stephanie N L Schmidt; Daniela Mier; Joachim Hass
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.235

4.  Can the early visual processing of others' actions be related to social power and dominance?

Authors:  Jérémy Decroix; Laurent Ott; Nicolas Morgado; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-11-21

5.  Understanding the Goals of Everyday Instrumental Actions Is Primarily Linked to Object, Not Motor-Kinematic, Information: Evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  Toby Nicholson; Matt Roser; Patric Bach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Object words modulate the activity of the mirror neuron system during action imitation.

Authors:  Haiyan Wu; Honghong Tang; Yue Ge; Suyong Yang; Xiaoqin Mai; Yue-Jia Luo; Chao Liu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  The relative contributions of visual and semantic information in the neural representation of object categories.

Authors:  Lindsay W Victoria; John A Pyles; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Grasping others' movements: Rapid discrimination of object size from observed hand movements.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Andrea Cavallo; Atesh Koul; Alessandro D'Ausilio; Laura Taverna; Cristina Becchio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Response: No need to match: a comment on Bach, Nicholson, and Hudson's "Affordance-Matching Hypothesis".

Authors:  Patric Bach; Toby Nicholson; Matthew Hudson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Multi-Dimensional Dynamics of Human Electromagnetic Brain Activity.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Emi Tanaka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.