Literature DB >> 25461711

Brain activity during observation and motor imagery of different balance tasks: an fMRI study.

Wolfgang Taube1, Michael Mouthon2, Christian Leukel3, Henri-Marcel Hoogewoud4, Jean-Marie Annoni2, Martin Keller5.   

Abstract

After immobilization, patients show impaired postural control and increased risk of falling. Therefore, loss of balance control should already be counteracted during immobilization. Previously, studies have demonstrated that both motor imagery (MI) and action observation (AO) can improve motor performance. The current study elaborated how the brain is activated during imagination and observation of different postural tasks to provide recommendations about the conception of non-physical balance training. For this purpose, participants were tested in a within-subject design in an fMRI-scanner in three different conditions: (a) AO + MI, (b) AO, and (c) MI. In (a) participants were instructed to imagine themselves as the person pictured in the video whereas in (b) they were instructed simply to watch the video. In (c) subjects closed their eyes and kinesthetically imagined the task displayed in the video. Two tasks were evaluated in each condition: (i) static standing balance and (ii) dynamic standing balance (medio-lateral perturbation). In all conditions the start of a new trial was indicated every 2 sec by a sound. During AO + MI of the dynamic task, participants activated motor centers including the putamen, cerebellum, supplementary motor area, premotor cortices (PMv/d) and primary motor cortex (M1). MI showed a similar pattern but no activity in M1 and PMv/d. In the SMA and cerebellum, activity was generally higher in the dynamic than in the static condition. AO did not significantly activate any of these brain areas. Our results showed that (I) mainly AO + MI, but also MI, activate brain regions important for balance control; (II) participants display higher levels of brain activation in the more demanding balance task; (III) there is a significant difference between AO + MI and AO. Consequently, best training effects should be expected when participants apply MI during AO (AO + MI) of challenging postural tasks.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action observation; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Motor imagery during action observation; Non-physical balance training

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25461711     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  50 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the supplementary motor area (SMA) influences performance on motor tasks.

Authors:  K E Hupfeld; C J Ketcham; H D Schneider
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Non-invasive Assessment of Changes in Corticomotoneuronal Transmission in Humans.

Authors:  Wolfgang Taube; Christian Leukel; Jens Bo Nielsen; Jesper Lundbye-Jensen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Mapping anticipatory anhedonia: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Joanna E Szczepanik; Jessica L Reed; Allison C Nugent; Elizabeth D Ballard; Jennifer W Evans; Carl W Lejuez; Carlos A Zarate
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  Postoperative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures Using Sensorimotor Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Ronit Wollstein; Hani Harel; Idit Lavi; Raviv Allon; Dafna Michael
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2018-09-27

5.  Consensus Paper: Ataxic Gait.

Authors:  Pierre Cabaraux; Sunil K Agrawal; Huaying Cai; Rocco Salvatore Calabro; Carlo Casali; Loic Damm; Sarah Doss; Christophe Habas; Anja K E Horn; Winfried Ilg; Elan D Louis; Hiroshi Mitoma; Vito Monaco; Maria Petracca; Alberto Ranavolo; Ashwini K Rao; Serena Ruggieri; Tommaso Schirinzi; Mariano Serrao; Susanna Summa; Michael Strupp; Olivia Surgent; Matthis Synofzik; Shuai Tao; Hiroo Terasi; Diego Torres-Russotto; Brittany Travers; Jaimie A Roper; Mario Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Motor Imagery Combined With Physical Training Improves Response Inhibition in the Stop Signal Task.

Authors:  Sung Min Son; Seong Ho Yun; Jung Won Kwon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-20

7.  Regional volumes in brain stem and cerebellum are associated with postural impairments in young brain-injured patients.

Authors:  David Drijkoningen; Inge Leunissen; Karen Caeyenberghs; Wouter Hoogkamer; Stefan Sunaert; Jacques Duysens; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Does sonification of action simulation training impact corticospinal excitability and audiomotor plasticity?

Authors:  Fabio Castro; Ladan Osman; Giovanni Di Pino; Aleksandra Vuckovic; Alexander Nowicky; Daniel Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Non-physical practice improves task performance in an unstable, perturbed environment: motor imagery and observational balance training.

Authors:  Wolfgang Taube; Michael Lorch; Sibylle Zeiter; Martin Keller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Brain connectivity during simulated balance in older adults with and without Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Pasman; Martin J McKeown; Saurabh Garg; Taylor W Cleworth; Bastiaan R Bloem; J Timothy Inglis; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.