Tracy M Adams1, Wendy L Kinzler2, Martin R Chavez2, Anthony M Vintzileos2. 1. Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY. Electronic address: Tracy.Adams@stonybrookmedicine.edu. 2. Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the timing of administration of antenatal corticosteroids (AS) for indicated preterm births and to identify which indications are associated with the most optimal timing of administration. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort of patients who received AS in anticipation of indicated preterm birth from 2009 through 2012 at Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY. Medical records of patients who received AS, as identified through the hospital pharmacy database, were reviewed. Patients were included if they had a singleton or twin gestation and they received AS for maternal or fetal indications. Women were excluded if they received AS for spontaneous preterm labor or preterm rupture of membranes. Maternal demographic and obstetrical characteristics were compared between those who received AS≤7 days vs >7 days from delivery using parametric and nonparametric tests with relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. P<.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In all, 193 patients were included in this study. Median latency from AS administration to delivery was 9 days (range, 0-83); 93 patients (48%) received AS within 7 days of delivery. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regards to baseline maternal characteristics. Those delivering within 7 days of AS administration were more likely to have maternal vs fetal indications (84% vs 16%). CONCLUSION: Only 48% of patients with an indication for preterm birth received AS within 7 days of its administration. AS appear to be more optimally timed in the presence of maternal rather than fetal indications.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the timing of administration of antenatal corticosteroids (AS) for indicated preterm births and to identify which indications are associated with the most optimal timing of administration. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort of patients who received AS in anticipation of indicated preterm birth from 2009 through 2012 at Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY. Medical records of patients who received AS, as identified through the hospital pharmacy database, were reviewed. Patients were included if they had a singleton or twin gestation and they received AS for maternal or fetal indications. Women were excluded if they received AS for spontaneous preterm labor or preterm rupture of membranes. Maternal demographic and obstetrical characteristics were compared between those who received AS≤7 days vs >7 days from delivery using parametric and nonparametric tests with relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. P<.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In all, 193 patients were included in this study. Median latency from AS administration to delivery was 9 days (range, 0-83); 93 patients (48%) received AS within 7 days of delivery. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regards to baseline maternal characteristics. Those delivering within 7 days of AS administration were more likely to have maternal vs fetal indications (84% vs 16%). CONCLUSION: Only 48% of patients with an indication for preterm birth received AS within 7 days of its administration. AS appear to be more optimally timed in the presence of maternal rather than fetal indications.
Authors: Montse Palacio; Elisenda Bonet-Carne; Teresa Cobo; Alvaro Perez-Moreno; Joan Sabrià; Jute Richter; Marian Kacerovsky; Bo Jacobsson; Raúl A García-Posada; Fernando Bugatto; Ramon Santisteve; Àngels Vives; Mauro Parra-Cordero; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; José Luis Bartha; Pilar Carretero-Lucena; Kai Lit Tan; Rogelio Cruz-Martínez; Minke Burke; Suseela Vavilala; Igor Iruretagoyena; Juan Luis Delgado; Mauro Schenone; Josep Vilanova; Francesc Botet; George S H Yeo; Jon Hyett; Jan Deprest; Roberto Romero; Eduard Gratacos Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Ashley N Battarbee; Stephanie T Ros; M Sean Esplin; Joseph Biggio; Radek Bukowski; Samuel Parry; Heping Zhang; Hao Huang; William Andrews; George Saade; Yoel Sadovsky; Uma M Reddy; Michael W Varner; Tracy A Manuck Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM Date: 2019-12-17
Authors: Tsukasa Takahashi; Yuki Takahashi; Erin L Fee; Haruo Usuda; Lucy Furfaro; John P Newnham; Alan H Jobe; Matthew W Kemp Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2022-10