Literature DB >> 25460374

Costly third-party punishment in young children.

Katherine McAuliffe1, Jillian J Jordan2, Felix Warneken3.   

Abstract

Human adults engage in costly third-party punishment of unfair behavior, but the developmental origins of this behavior are unknown. Here we investigate costly third-party punishment in 5- and 6-year-old children. Participants were asked to accept (enact) or reject (punish) proposed allocations of resources between a pair of absent, anonymous children. In addition, we manipulated whether subjects had to pay a cost to punish proposed allocations. Experiment 1 showed that 6-year-olds (but not 5-year-olds) punished unfair proposals more than fair proposals. However, children punished less when doing so was personally costly. Thus, while sensitive to cost, they were willing to sacrifice resources to intervene against unfairness. Experiment 2 showed that 6-year-olds were less sensitive to unequal allocations when they resulted from selfishness than generosity. These findings show that costly third-party punishment of unfair behavior is present in young children, suggesting that from early in development children show a sophisticated capacity to promote fair behavior.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cooperation; Fairness; Inequity aversion; Social cognition; Third-party punishment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25460374     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  30 in total

1.  Does dishonesty really invite third-party punishment? Results of a more stringent test.

Authors:  Naoki Konishi; Yohsuke Ohtsubo
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  The origins of infants' fairness concerns and links to prosocial behavior.

Authors:  Jessica A Sommerville; Elizabeth A Enright
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-01-31

3.  Toddlers and infants expect individuals to refrain from helping an ingroup victim's aggressor.

Authors:  Fransisca Ting; Zijing He; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The origins of criminal law.

Authors:  Daniel Sznycer; Carlton Patrick
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-02-24

5.  Social norms and cultural diversity in the development of third-party punishment.

Authors:  Bailey R House; Patricia Kanngiesser; H Clark Barrett; Süheyla Yilmaz; Andrew Marcus Smith; Carla Sebastian-Enesco; Alejandro Erut; Joan B Silk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Infants' Understanding of Distributive Fairness as a Test Case for Identifying the Extents and Limits of Infants' Sociomoral Cognition and Behavior.

Authors:  Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  Child Dev Perspect       Date:  2018-02-19

7.  THE GORDON WILSON LECTURE: THE ETHICS OF HUMAN GENOME EDITING.

Authors:  Barry S Coller
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2020

8.  Infants expect ingroup support to override fairness when resources are limited.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Stephanie Sloane; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Children's reasoning about distributive and retributive justice across development.

Authors:  Craig E Smith; Felix Warneken
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2016-02-04

Review 10.  The emerging neuroscience of social punishment: Meta-analytic evidence.

Authors:  Gabriele Bellucci; Julia A Camilleri; Vijeth Iyengar; Simon B Eickhoff; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.