BACKGROUND: Recently introduced hematology analyzer, the Sysmex XN modular system (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan), has newly adopted a florescent channel to detect platelets and immature platelet fraction (IPF). This study aimed to establish new reference intervals for %-IPF and absolute number of IPF (A-IPF) on Sysmex XN. Platelet counts, %-IPF, and A-IPF were also compared between Sysmex XN and XE-2100 systems (Sysmex). METHODS: Except outliers, blood samples from 2104 healthy individuals and 140 umbilical cord blood were analyzed using both Sysmex XN and XE-2100. The results of two systems were compared using Bland-Altman plot. The reference intervals for %-IPF and A-IPF were defined using non-parametric percentile methods according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guideline (C28-A3). RESULTS: The platelet counts, %-IPF, and A-IPF showed non-parametric distributions. The mean difference between Sysmex XN and XE-2100 in healthy individuals revealed a positive bias in platelets (+8.0×109/L), %-IPF (+1.2%), and A-IPF (+3.0×109/L). The reference intervals for %-IPF and A-IPF on Sysmex XN were: 1.0%-7.3% and 2.49-15.64×109/L in healthy individuals; and 1.0%-4.4% and 2.94-12.82×109/L in umbilical cord blood. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study demonstrates a clear difference of platelet counts and IPF between Sysmex XN and XE-2100. The new reference intervals for IPF on Sysmex XN would provide fundamental data for clinical practice and future research.
BACKGROUND: Recently introduced hematology analyzer, the Sysmex XN modular system (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan), has newly adopted a florescent channel to detect platelets and immature platelet fraction (IPF). This study aimed to establish new reference intervals for %-IPF and absolute number of IPF (A-IPF) on Sysmex XN. Platelet counts, %-IPF, and A-IPF were also compared between Sysmex XN and XE-2100 systems (Sysmex). METHODS: Except outliers, blood samples from 2104 healthy individuals and 140 umbilical cord blood were analyzed using both Sysmex XN and XE-2100. The results of two systems were compared using Bland-Altman plot. The reference intervals for %-IPF and A-IPF were defined using non-parametric percentile methods according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute guideline (C28-A3). RESULTS: The platelet counts, %-IPF, and A-IPF showed non-parametric distributions. The mean difference between Sysmex XN and XE-2100 in healthy individuals revealed a positive bias in platelets (+8.0×109/L), %-IPF (+1.2%), and A-IPF (+3.0×109/L). The reference intervals for %-IPF and A-IPF on Sysmex XN were: 1.0%-7.3% and 2.49-15.64×109/L in healthy individuals; and 1.0%-4.4% and 2.94-12.82×109/L in umbilical cord blood. CONCLUSIONS: This large-scale study demonstrates a clear difference of platelet counts and IPF between Sysmex XN and XE-2100. The new reference intervals for IPF on Sysmex XN would provide fundamental data for clinical practice and future research.
Authors: Rasha A El-Gamal; Mohamed A Mekawy; Ayman M Abd Elkader; Haitham M Abdelbary; Mary Z Fayek Journal: Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus Date: 2019-10-05 Impact factor: 0.900
Authors: B C MacQueen; R D Christensen; E Henry; A M Romrell; T J Pysher; S T Bennett; M C Sola-Visner Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Sang Hyuk Park; Chan Jeoung Park; Bo Ra Lee; Mi Jeong Kim; Min Young Han; Young Uk Cho; Seongsoo Jang Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Claudia E Imperiali; Ariadna Arbiol-Roca; Lourdes Sanchez-Navarro; Macarena Dastis-Arias; Juan C Lopez-Delgado; Anna Cortes-Bosch; Ana Sancho-Cerro; Dolors Dot-Bach Journal: Biochem Med (Zagreb) Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 2.313