BACKGROUND: Angiosarcoma is a rare subtype of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Doxorubicinis the standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced STS. It is not known whether angiosarcoma response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy is different to other STS subtypes. METHODS: Pooled data were analysed from 11 prospective randomised and non-randomized European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) clinical trials of first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy for advanced STS. Baseline patient characteristics, chemotherapy response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of angiosarcoma patients were compared with other STS patients. Analysis was performed to identify factors prognostic for angiosarcoma response to chemotherapy, PFS and OS. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4.2 years, data from 108 locally advanced and metastatic angiosarcoma patients and 2557 patients with other STS histologies were analysed. 25% of angiosarcoma patients had a complete or partial response to chemotherapy compared to 21% for other STS histotypes. The median PFS was 4.9 months and OS 9.9 months, which were not significantly different from other STS histotypes. In univariate analysis, bone metastases were an adverse prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–2.67; p = 0.036). Tumour grade was as an adverse prognostic factor for PFS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.01–2.92; p = 0.044) and OS (HR 2.03; 95% CI 1.16–3.56; p = 0.011). Compared to single agent anthracyclines, doxorubicin + ifosfamide was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33–0.86; p = 0.010) and OS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32–0.90; p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Angiosarcoma response and survival following first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy was similar to other STS histotypes. Our analysis provides a useful measure of angiosarcoma response to chemotherapy for comparison with future clinical trials.
BACKGROUND:Angiosarcoma is a rare subtype of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Doxorubicinis the standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced STS. It is not known whether angiosarcoma response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy is different to other STS subtypes. METHODS: Pooled data were analysed from 11 prospective randomised and non-randomized European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) clinical trials of first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy for advanced STS. Baseline patient characteristics, chemotherapy response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of angiosarcomapatients were compared with other STS patients. Analysis was performed to identify factors prognostic for angiosarcoma response to chemotherapy, PFS and OS. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4.2 years, data from 108 locally advanced and metastatic angiosarcomapatients and 2557 patients with other STS histologies were analysed. 25% of angiosarcomapatients had a complete or partial response to chemotherapy compared to 21% for other STS histotypes. The median PFS was 4.9 months and OS 9.9 months, which were not significantly different from other STS histotypes. In univariate analysis, bone metastases were an adverse prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–2.67; p = 0.036). Tumour grade was as an adverse prognostic factor for PFS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.01–2.92; p = 0.044) and OS (HR 2.03; 95% CI 1.16–3.56; p = 0.011). Compared to single agent anthracyclines, doxorubicin + ifosfamide was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33–0.86; p = 0.010) and OS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32–0.90; p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS:Angiosarcoma response and survival following first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy was similar to other STS histotypes. Our analysis provides a useful measure of angiosarcoma response to chemotherapy for comparison with future clinical trials.
Authors: Barbara A Conley; Lou Staudt; Naoko Takebe; David A Wheeler; Linghua Wang; Maria F Cardenas; Viktoriya Korchina; Jean Claude Zenklusen; Lisa M McShane; James V Tricoli; Paul M Williams; Irina Lubensky; Geraldine O'Sullivan-Coyne; Elise Kohn; Richard F Little; Jeffrey White; Shakun Malik; Lyndsay N Harris; Bhupinder Mann; Carol Weil; Roy Tarnuzzer; Chris Karlovich; Brian Rodgers; Lalitha Shankar; Paula M Jacobs; Tracy Nolan; Sean M Berryman; Julie Gastier-Foster; Jay Bowen; Kristen Leraas; Hui Shen; Peter W Laird; Manel Esteller; Vincent Miller; Adrienne Johnson; Elijah F Edmondson; Thomas J Giordano; Benjamin Kim; S Percy Ivy Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Hee Kyung Kim; Sun Young Kim; Su Jin Lee; Mihyeon Kang; Seung Tae Kim; Jiryeon Jang; Oliver Rath; Julia Schueler; Dong Woo Lee; Woong Yang Park; Sung Joo Kim; Se Hoon Park; Jeeyun Lee Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Jii Bum Lee; Beung-Chul Ahn; Seung Hyun Kim; Young Han Lee; Jung Woo Han; Min Kyung Jeon; Soo Hee Kim; Hyo Song Kim Journal: Future Sci OA Date: 2021-03-02