Literature DB >> 25458924

No shortcut solution to the problem of Y-STR match probability calculation.

Amke Caliebe1, Arne Jochens2, Sascha Willuweit3, Lutz Roewer4, Michael Krawczak5.   

Abstract

Match probability calculation is deemed much more intricate for lineage genetic markers, including Y-chromosomal short tandem repeats (Y-STRs), than for autosomal markers. This is because, owing to the lack of recombination, strong interdependence between markers is likely, which implies that haplotype frequency estimates cannot simply be obtained through the multiplication of allele frequency estimates. As yet, however, the practical relevance of this problem has not been studied in much detail using real data. In fact, such scrutiny appears well warranted because the high mutation rates of Y-STRs and the possibility of backward mutation should have worked against the statistical association of Y-STRs. We examined haplotype data of 21 markers included in the PowerPlex(®)Y23 set (PPY23, Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) originating from six different populations (four European and two Asian). Assessing the conditional entropies of the markers, given different subsets of markers from the same panel, we demonstrate that the PowerPlex(®)Y23 set cannot be decomposed into smaller marker subsets that would be (conditionally) independent. Nevertheless, in all six populations, >94% of the joint entropy of the 21 markers is explained by the seven most rapidly mutating markers. Although this result might render a reduction in marker number a sensible option for practical casework, the partial haplotypes would still be almost as diverse as the full haplotypes. Therefore, match probability calculation remains difficult and calls for the improvement of currently available methods of haplotype frequency estimation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Entropy; Interdependence between Y-STRs; PowerPlex(®)Y23; Product rule

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25458924     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  4 in total

1.  The validation study of a novel assay with 30 slow and moderate mutation Y-STR markers for criminal investigation and database applications.

Authors:  Yongsong Zhou; Tong Xie; Yuxin Guo; Xinglin Mei; Qiong Lan; Yating Fang; Xiaoye Jin; Bofeng Zhu
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Breed traceability of buffalo meat using microsatellite genotyping technique.

Authors:  Bheemashankar H Kannur; Md Nadeem Fairoze; P S Girish; Nagappa Karabasanavar; B H Rudresh
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  A Nonparametric Bayesian Approach to the Rare Type Match Problem.

Authors:  Giulia Cereda; Richard D Gill
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.524

4.  How convincing is a matching Y-chromosome profile?

Authors:  Mikkel M Andersen; David J Balding
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 5.917

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.