Literature DB >> 25458798

Follow-up after gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis.

Fred Brody1, Sara L Zettervall2, Nathan G Richards2, Cathy Garey2, Richard L Amdur2, Antoinette Saddler3, M Aamir Ali3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is used to treat medically refractory gastroparesis. However, there are few large series with outcomes beyond 12 months. This study reports surgical outcomes of GES for patients up to 8 years receiving treatment from a single institution. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective database was reviewed from 2003 to 2013 for patients undergoing GES. Baseline patient characteristics were recorded, including age, sex, cause of gastroparesis, gastric emptying, and Hgb A1C. Outcomes variables included nutrition supplementation, additional operations, 30-day morbidity, and mortality. Pre- and postoperative pain and function scores are analyzed over time using generalized estimating equations. Patient outcomes in terms of reoperation rates and types of operations are also reviewed.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients underwent GES with a mean ± SD age of 43 ± 11 years and a BMI of 27 ± 8 kg/m(2). Symptom scores were available for 60 patients: 60 patients at baseline, 52 patients at 1 year, 14 patients during years 2 to 3, and 18 patients during years 4 to 8. Symptom scores decreased considerably in all categories. At 1-year follow-up, 44% and 31% of patients had at least a 25% reduction in symptom distress for functional and pain symptoms, respectively. Preoperatively, 9 patients required nutrition supplementation. After implantation, 34 (43%) patients underwent additional operations, with a mean of 2.15 operations per patient. Generator-related causes were the most common indication for reoperation, including battery exchanges and relocation. Other operations included 8 gastrectomies and 7 median arcuate ligament releases. Postoperatively, 4 patients required supplemental nutrition. There were no 30-day mortalities, but 11 patients died during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: Gastric electrical stimulation was significantly associated with reductions in both functional and pain-related symptoms of gastroparesis. Patients who undergo GES have a high likelihood of additional surgery.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25458798     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  7 in total

1.  [Gastroparesis: Critical consideration of therapeutic management].

Authors:  M Tiller; W Schepp; F Gundling
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis and Chronic Unexplained Nausea and Vomiting.

Authors:  John M Wo; Thomas V Nowak; Shamaila Waseem; Matthew P Ward
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12

3.  Early Assessment of Cost-effectiveness of Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Diabetic Nausea and Vomiting.

Authors:  Mette W Klinge; Peter Rask; Lene S Mortensen; Kathrine Lassen; Niels Ejskjaer; Lars H Ehlers; Klaus Krogh
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.924

4.  Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (G-POEM) as a Treatment for Refractory Gastroparesis: Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Jiaxin Xu; Tianyin Chen; Shaimaa Elkholy; Meidong Xu; Yunshi Zhong; Yiqun Zhang; Weifeng Chen; Wenzheng Qin; Mingyan Cai; Pinghong Zhou
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-10-22

5.  Gastric Electric Stimulation for Refractory Gastroparesis.

Authors:  Bryan Zoll; Asad Jehangir; Zubair Malik; Michael A Edwards; Roman V Petrov; Henry P Parkman
Journal:  J Clin Outcomes Manag       Date:  2019-01

Review 6.  Nausea and Vomiting in 2021: A Comprehensive Update.

Authors:  Matthew Heckroth; Robert T Luckett; Chris Moser; Dipendra Parajuli; Thomas L Abell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.174

Review 7.  Gastric Electrical Stimulation with the Enterra System: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nikhil Lal; Sam Livemore; Declan Dunne; Iftikhar Khan
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.260

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.